Just like Stoner's Pot Palace (Simpsons, man!! Look it up!!).. this is flagrant false advertising!!
Just like Stoner's Pot Palace (Simpsons, man!! Look it up!!).. this is flagrant false advertising!!
We have two heads, but only enough blood to use one of them at any one timeFeminist Indignation? Huh? why dont we teach men to not be neanderthals and not fondle and rape provocatively dressed women?? wouldnt that be the actual answer to the problem? Last time I checked, men had brains. why dont they just use them more?
DING DING DING!!This debate has been done to death. Women should realize that they are increasing their risk of being sexually assaulted by dressing provocatively and men should realize that sexual assualt is a crime no matter how the victim is dressed. Is there much more to say?
What's that got to do with the price of chicken in rome? Rape is not a crime of passion. It's a crime of violence. It's primarily motivated by a desire for power, not by an ordinary desire for sex.DING DING DING!!
If I flash a wad of cash in a poor neighborhood with a high crime rate, I'm more likely to get robbed than the next guy who has more sense than to do such a thing. I'm not "asking for it", I don't "deserve it", but common sense says there are things I could have done that could have prevented it.
So say a rapist sees two women walking out of a club. One is dressed like a slut (or, provocatively, if you will..), the other conservatively. All other things being equal.. who do you think his victim will be?Even with the right to wear anything you want, the underlying premise that dressing like a slut is going to incite a rapist in an alleyway to lose control over the outfit and rape, is not proven out by published research.
It is a premise that seems reasonable and based on common sense, but both lose meaning when dealing with any man who would rape a woman.
So you disagree with me? You think there is zero additional risk of sexual assault no matter how someone is dressed?It must be nice to have the privilege of not living with the constant threat of being sexually assaulted, and yet believe that you have a better grasp than women do of the threat we face on a daily basis.
Ding, ding, ding, bingo!What's that got to do with the price of chicken in rome? Rape is not a crime of passion. It's a crime of violence. It's primarily motivated by a desire for power, not by an ordinary desire for sex.
Neither. That is not a common rape scenario. I defy you to find even one rape that occurred that way.So say a rapist sees two women walking out of a club. One is dressed like a slut (or, provocatively, if you will..), the other conservatively. All other things being equal.. who do you think his victim will be?
Do you remember a few short years ago that real estate agent who was raped and murdered around the Bay/Bloor area? I think she was dressed in a business suit or business-casual, not like a streetwalker.So say a rapist sees two women walking out of a club. One is dressed like a slut (or, provocatively, if you will..), the other conservatively. All other things being equal.. who do you think his victim will be?
The word you are looking for is negligible. It's not a factor on the top 100 things you should worry about if you're a woman interested in lowering your chance of being raped.You think there is zero additional risk of sexual assault no matter how someone is dressed?
Look, I'm not saying that how a woman dresses is a huge factor in whether she'll get raped or not (there probably *is* a stronger case for that for sexual assault, though - especially around drunken, horny guys..), but it *is* a factor. Maybe the risk is negligible, but it's not zero.Neither. That is not a common rape scenario. I defy you to find even one rape that occurred that way.
The most likely victim is the one that knew the rapist. Overwhelmingly, that is the most likely scenario. Way, way, way down the list is the woman who walked home through the park instead of catching a cab. In neither case does it matter what she was wearing.
It's pretty much unheard of for rapists to go select strangers as victims based on who they think is most attractive. Has it ever happened in the entire history of the human race? Sure. All sorts of unlikely things have happened in the history of the human race--this is not a factor that anybody should pay attention to.
Sure. Our laws classify all sexual assaults similarly, rape is in essentially the same category as a woman getting her ass grabbed in a bar. While it's offensive, I also think the average woman is capable of dealing with the ass grabber on her own, and is probably not going to be scarred for life by the experience.Fuji, you know that sexual assault is defined as any form of sexual contact without both parties' consent.
I will agree that's true. Will you agree that there is no point in altering your behavior to eliminate negligible risks?Maybe the risk is negligible, but it's not zero.
Possibly, depends on the situation. I'd say the risk of a fire in your home is rather negligible, but do you not have insurance?I will agree that's true. Will you agree that there is no point in altering your behavior to eliminate negligible risks?
The risk that I will be struck by a meteor later on this evening if I step outside is also negligible but not zero--but I'm still going out tonight.
Slutty clothing - OK. Burka - NOT OK. Cultural imperialism - OK.Western society in the world is always diverse and every kind has full right to live and wore whatever they choose without any fear . Slutty clothing is after all a dressing style !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [/B said:oh wait then same rules should apply to burka