And still Hillary got more votes.oldjones, got some more trivia for you regarding the popularity of the winner:
LOL
Kudos to Kathleen for posting this new info in another thread.
And still Hillary got more votes.oldjones, got some more trivia for you regarding the popularity of the winner:
LOL
Kudos to Kathleen for posting this new info in another thread.
I think the major flaw in your argument is using the word "won". Hillary won nothing except early retirement. The way to win the Presidency is to get the most electoral votes, she did not do that so she won nothing. You can say more people voted for her, but she didn't win anything. Winning and Hillary seem to be dissimilar items.And up is down. What is this nonsense you're peddling? If you get the most votes, you have 'won' the popular vote.
Exactly. oldjones is talking about a fictional competition. How can you "win" the popular vote when nobody was competing for the popular vote???I think the major flaw in your argument is using the word "won". Hillary won nothing except early retirement. The way to win the Presidency is to get the most electoral votes, she did not do that so she won nothing. You can say more people voted for her, but she didn't win anything. Winning and Hillary seem to be dissimilar items.
60 million ordinary voters rejected him or voted for him?Then, where are the votes to prove it? The count says ordinary voters rejected him, no matter how low their opinion of Clinton.
Some also say he's a despicable pervert, serial liar, incompetent at in business and bankrupt, but that doesn't make it true. Stick to facts.
In spite of all the above, indeed he did win the coupla hundred votes that alone decide the Presidency in the US, and those poor schmucks hafta vote for him no matter what they personally think or feel. Or they get sued.
Now isn't that a democratic example for the world!
Still waiting for your definition of 'popular' — which seems to grow stranger with every illustration you offer — and reasons why it has the slightest connection to votes and elections.
As we know, the GOP is a party in decline due to demographics. The fact that Trump got MORE votes than any other Republican candidate in history speaks volumes. He was cast as Hitler!Yet she still got the most votes. If she is unpopular then what does that say about Trump?
Practically nobody knew who Obama was before he began running President but his likability and media exposure turned him into an instant worldwide celebrity. If you have the media behind you, hundreds of millions of dollars showered on you for your campaign, and a bit of talent, you can could get more votes than Clinton did. LOLAnd still Hillary got more votes.
As we know, the GOP is a party that's been atrophying for decades due to demographics. The fact that he got MORE votes than any other Republican candidate in history speaks volumes. This despite being cast as Hitler.
Clinton is right where she belongs, unpopular as ever, and soon-to-be forgotten.
I love these posts. You start cheering because Trump got more popular votes than Bush but suddenly don't care about popular vote when he is outdone by Obama and even Hillary.Practically nobody knew who Obama was before he began running President but his likability and media exposure turned him into a worldwide celebrity. If you have the media behind, and a bit of talent, you can could get more votes than Clinton did. LOL
It is surprising that the least popular candidate ever beat the second least popular candidate.As we know, the GOP is a party in decline due to demographics. The fact that Trump got MORE votes than any other Republican candidate in history speaks volumes. He was cast as Hitler!
Clinton is right where she belongs, unpopular as ever, and soon-to-be forgotten.
Bush, Obama, and Trump were competing for the same thing - the electoral college. The actual total number of votes is just a byproduct but not the focus of the campaigns. That Trump got a record share of votes is astonishing and interesting trivia. Did Clinton break any records? lolI love these posts. You start cheering because Trump got more popular votes than Bush but suddenly don't care about popular vote when he is outdone by Obama and even Hillary.
And yet you were still bragging about total votes. When your candidate got less than the opposition you should either stick to bragging about electoral votes or continue to make yourself look bad.Bush, Obama, and Trump were competing for the same thing - the electoral college. ...
You need to tell smallcock. "Hillary won the 'popular' vote" was his phrase, and I added the quote marks in my reply, to point out it was a dubious usage. You might also tell the OP that as no one 'win's the popular vote, likewise no one can lose it.I think the major flaw in your argument is using the word "won". Hillary won nothing except early retirement. The way to win the Presidency is to get the most electoral votes, she did not do that so she won nothing. You can say more people voted for her, but she didn't win anything. Winning and Hillary seem to be dissimilar items.
By the same token Trump ought to have been able to win without Comey's intervention, but couldn't, he was losing without Comey's help. So that cuts both ways.She should have been able to win handily with or without Comey's investigation, if she had bothered to campaign properly.
Another smallcock "fact": you alt right types never bother checking your "facts" most of which are made up.The fact that Trump got MORE votes than any other Republican candidate in history speaks volumes.
You must have missed this post from Kathleen in the media thread or do you purposely set yourself up to be constantly corrected?Another smallcock "fact": you alt right types never bother checking your "facts" most of which are made up.
Trump got fewer votes than even GW in 2004 and far fewer than Obama got in either election.
P.S Obama is a DemocratDonald Trump has broken another record
Decision Desk HQ is reporting that Donald Trump has officially crossed the national popular vote record for Republicans set by George W Bush in 2004. After updating new results from counties in Pennsylvania, Trump is currently at 62,041,367 popular votes. Bush received a total of 62,040,610 in 2004.
Trump - 62,041,367
Bush - 62,040,610
With well over 2 million votes still left to count, Trump's popular vote could still go even higher.
More nonsense. The popular vote actually determines which Electors are chosen. That makes their subsequent vote — after the rigging process of Winner Take All is applied — the byproduct of the general election. So every campaign is focussed on maximizing the vote, and every campaign tries to spread that vote across enough states with enough Electoral votes to win. Trump succeeded and won. Changes nothing. More people wanted her to be President than him.Bush, Obama, and Trump were competing for the same thing - the electoral college. The actual total number of votes is just a byproduct but not the focus of the campaigns. That Trump got a record share of votes is astonishing and interesting trivia. Did Clinton break any records? lol
I don't know what Hillary was competing for. The popular vote maybe?
It is like oldjones whining about his team losing the Stanley Cup finals 4 games to 3 when they outscored the other team 30 to 29 in popular goals.Exactly. oldjones is talking about a fictional competition. How can you "win" the popular vote when nobody was competing for the popular vote???
You are ignoring the fact the media was coordinating with the Clinton campaign. Take out the media bashing Trump 24/7 and you will see the real picture in an media neutral race. The media wouldnt even cover the Wikileaks lol. They went bananas over the Trump tape and the Tax returns.Which they do before they count and announce the totals. Unlike statistical polls, in an election every single vote is actually seen, evaluated for validity, and counted individually. It is what it is, not some airy-fairy projection that some 'expert' hopes would be "…accurate ±2% 19 times out of 20", in a real vote.
This was the real vote, in the real election. Trump got fewer votes than the loser. In a year where most folks disliked both major candidates Trump was the clear choice for Most Unpopular, but was still awarded (Ok, not quite yet) the Presidency.
If that's what Americans want for themselves, they can go back to sleep until 2020, or 2024, but they might just wake up to discover someone quietly made the College even worse. Much better to straighten it out now. Thanks be the President-Elect is so committed to eliminating election rigging.
What, you don't think Mexican American's should have the vote?Still counting those 3 million votes from mexico I see. She didn't win the popular vote amongst the legit American citizens. You guys are seriously kidding yourselves if you truly believe the illegals weren't voting their asses off in this election. The real numbers will come out after the big inauguration protest.
Your idea of "neutral" is a racist site like Breitbart. You think the media wasn't neutral because they reported honestly on Trump.You are ignoring the fact the media was coordinating with the Clinton campaign. Take out the media bashing Trump 24/7 and you will see the real picture in an media neutral race. The media wouldnt even cover the Wikileaks lol. They went bananas over the Trump tape and the Tax returns.