That is you guys problem, not mine. I am just posting updates.of course, you're not.
Why would you even question that others may think that you are?
Drink some warm milk, take a nap and get back to us when you come back to your senses.
That is you guys problem, not mine. I am just posting updates.of course, you're not.
Why would you even question that others may think that you are?
Drink some warm milk, take a nap and get back to us when you come back to your senses.
LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".Both are tabloid weekly magazines. Hindustan Times is a newspaper. They present news from authentic, indisputable and honest sources such as the Russian Ministry of Defence.
To be fair you do have to judge based on the source. Otherwise you wouldn't know whether the information is trustworthy or not. The problem is when people argue, that something is inaccurate and question the source because they dont like what they hear.LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".
Nothing is trustworthy unless you can cross check and verify. All intelligence services listen and watch the mainstream media, even those of North Korea because in every lie there usually is a kernel of truth.To be fair you do have to judge based on the source. Otherwise you wouldn't know whether the information is trustworthy or not. The problem is when people argue, that something is inaccurate because they dont like what they hear.
Sure and you cross check with sources. Many MSM news outlets dont list sources though.Nothing is trustworthy unless you can cross check and verify. All intelligence services listen and watch the mainstream media, even those of North Korea because in every lie there usually is a kernel of truth.
And in the 'free thinkers' world that's how you end up with Qanon, J6, hydroxychloroquine, LGBTQ attacks, the freedom convoy.....LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".
Gibberish?? I'm not sure, anymore.And in the 'free thinkers' world that's how you end up with Qanon, J6, hydroxychloroquine, LGBTQ attacks, the freedom convoy.....
there is little difficulty in understanding a pro-Russian stance anywhere in India. Ever since independence in 1947, India has had a far better and more consistent relationship with the USSR (and then Russia) than with the West. The West is a complicated entity for India, including the UK, France and Portugal and most importantly the USA after independence. The USA have always leaned towards Pakistan, rather than India. Even though they offered secret support when the Chinese invaded India in 1962, this flipped in the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 (when Bangladesh sought independence from Pakistan with India’s help). The US sabre-rattling in 1971, when the Sixth Fleet sailed towards the conflict, has not been forgotten in India. Nor has the fact that the USSR provided staunch support throughout the conflict, including the use of their veto in the UN Security Council.
Understandable. As much as the western support for Ukraine is understandable.there is little difficulty in understanding a pro-Russian stance anywhere in India. Ever since independence in 1947, India has had a far better and more consistent relationship with the USSR (and then Russia) than with the West. The West is a complicated entity for India, including the UK, France and Portugal and most importantly the USA after independence. The USA have always leaned towards Pakistan, rather than India. Even though they offered secret support when the Chinese invaded India in 1962, this flipped in the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 (when Bangladesh sought independence from Pakistan with India’s help). The US sabre-rattling in 1971, when the Sixth Fleet sailed towards the conflict, has not been forgotten in India. Nor has the fact that the USSR provided staunch support throughout the conflict, including the use of their veto in the UN Security Council.
As such, it is entirely unremarkable for the favour to be returned now with a stance sympathetic to the Russian cause.
![]()
I follow the Ukraine War. One source, "The Hindustan Times", consistently takes, "a pro-Russian" stance, such as publishing great Russian...
Answer (1 of 19): One of: * General attitudes in India, and amongst readers of the Hindustan Times in particular to Russia and to NATO countries ; * Funding: whoever funds the Times has told them to take that viewpoint. This is more common than people think but only usually becomes clear with ...www.quora.com
Seems Indias foreign minister says more or less the same thing:there is little difficulty in understanding a pro-Russian stance anywhere in India. Ever since independence in 1947, India has had a far better and more consistent relationship with the USSR (and then Russia) than with the West. The West is a complicated entity for India, including the UK, France and Portugal and most importantly the USA after independence. The USA have always leaned towards Pakistan, rather than India. Even though they offered secret support when the Chinese invaded India in 1962, this flipped in the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 (when Bangladesh sought independence from Pakistan with India’s help). The US sabre-rattling in 1971, when the Sixth Fleet sailed towards the conflict, has not been forgotten in India. Nor has the fact that the USSR provided staunch support throughout the conflict, including the use of their veto in the UN Security Council.
As such, it is entirely unremarkable for the favour to be returned now with a stance sympathetic to the Russian cause.
![]()
I follow the Ukraine War. One source, "The Hindustan Times", consistently takes, "a pro-Russian" stance, such as publishing great Russian...
Answer (1 of 19): One of: * General attitudes in India, and amongst readers of the Hindustan Times in particular to Russia and to NATO countries ; * Funding: whoever funds the Times has told them to take that viewpoint. This is more common than people think but only usually becomes clear with ...www.quora.com
hope they will choke on oil that tastes like bloodSeems Indias foreign minister says more or less the same thing:
![]()
Russia supported India when the West preferred a military dictatorship next to us
#shorts #shortsvideo #latestnews In response to an Australian reporter on India’s cordial relations with RussiaEAM S Jaishankar said; Russia supported India...www.youtube.com
If that were the case none of us in the west would be alive after what we did to Iraq.hope they will choke on oil that tastes like blood
Yup Top US General says that, while sipping coffee in his office 20,000 miles away.Russia is ‘getting hammered’: Top US general on Bakhmut battle
Modi is a populist, like rump.Seems Indias foreign minister says more or less the same thing:
![]()
Russia supported India when the West preferred a military dictatorship next to us
#shorts #shortsvideo #latestnews In response to an Australian reporter on India’s cordial relations with RussiaEAM S Jaishankar said; Russia supported India...www.youtube.com