Ah, the argument used to justify fictitious fears. Did Christian groups having that right for a century lead to Canonical Law? Did Jews using it make us all follow the Torah?Slippery slope.
...
Ah, the argument used to justify fictitious fears. Did Christian groups having that right for a century lead to Canonical Law? Did Jews using it make us all follow the Torah?Slippery slope.
...
There is no definition there, but seeing as the Israeli Minister of Security is part of a party listed as 'terrorist', you just made the case that Israel are also terrorist by your terms.Take your own advice. You have made clear that in your definition, terrorism is anything that Israel does as you have shown when you've accused Israel of terrorism for shooting back at PIJ fighters. At the same time you keep denying that there are Palestinian terrorists, going so far as claiming it is racist to say they are, simply because they set out to butcher and kidnap as many Jewish civilians as possible.
My definition of terrorism is in line with Canada's.
Currently listed entities
Introduction to the terms of reference and listing of terrorist entities according to Canada's Anti-Terrorism Actwww.publicsafety.gc.ca
Ummm Franky thinks they're freedom fighters...Nice to see some Hamas members recognize the atrocities their leaders told them to commit are atrocities.
But nice to see you starting to recognize that Hamas leadership aren't the good guys.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.Given that Israel has totally destroyed half of the housing in Gaza, its going to take a shit ton of money to fix.
I posted a link.I asked you about Ontario. You claimed they tried to introduce Sharia Law in Ontario. Where is the evidence? I am not interested in Indonesia - that is a Muslim country anyway. They can choose to introduce Sharia if they want to. But where is the evidence to support your claim about Ontario?
It is more likely than possible.Is it possible Hamas intentionally bombed their own hospital and placed the blame on Israel?
It does. Its teachings cause it.Strange because you were just arguing that it was Islam that caused that authoritarianism. No point in trying to change the topic now just because you were smacked in the face with communist, Christian, and Buddhist authoritarians.
Your bullshit will never end...you compare Israel with hamas...a country with a terrorist faction....your hate for jews knows no bounds...Both Hamas and Israel have committed terrorism by targeting civilians and both should be charged for all war crimes.
You, and all Israeli supporters, want everyone to use the 'terrorist' label. I'll go along with that if you also agree that the Israeli government and army are also terrorists, as they are guilty of the same crimes but on a much, much more massive scale.
Agree?
Aceh province. Iran. AfghanistanAh, the argument used to justify fictitious fears. Did Christian groups having that right for a century lead to Canonical Law? Did Jews using it make us all follow the Torah?
That would be 12,000 pounds of explosive, more than one Hiroshima sized nuke.An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
I hate terrorists and racists.Your bullshit will never end...you compare Israel with hamas...a country with a terrorist faction....your hate for jews knows no bounds...
Sure you only like Jews who won't fight back....easier to make them extinct....I hate terrorists and racists.
Take them all to the Hague and end apartheid.
Jews are fine, take the good people at IJVCanada for example.
Ummm Franky thinks they're freedom fighters...
We went over this, you, like basketcase use the term based on race. Not on the acts.Yet you love Khalistanis and you won't explicitly call out Hamas as terrorists. You won't say the 3 words - "Khalistanis are terrorists" or "Hamas are terrorists". Why?
I'm sure that Hamas has banked most of the money that was intended for gazan relief.Given that Israel has totally destroyed half of the housing in Gaza, its going to take a shit ton of money to fix.
Because he knows that Hamas can provide that fuel to them within a few hours.He didn't seem that concerned. He gave a calm, very low key explanation as if to a child, their reason for not changing course.
In the interests of being fully open, ultra-orthodox Jews limit women's rights, though not nearly as severely as Muslims in many Islamic countries. And rabbinical courts even in North America are the only ones that can grant a full Jewish divorce, without which a Jewish woman who has only a civil divorce cannot get remarried in a Conservative or Orthodox ceremony, whether in a synagogue or some other venue..Ah, the argument used to justify fictitious fears. Did Christian groups having that right for a century lead to Canonical Law? Did Jews using it make us all follow the Torah?