sighYou back killing of Jews and retaliation you call Genocide, bravo Sir.
sighYou back killing of Jews and retaliation you call Genocide, bravo Sir.
Who's here taking you seriously ? It's irrelevant what I post here - your opinion will never changeYou just destroyed the chance of anybody taking you seriously by posting that as a source and claiming Haaretz isn't legit.
This is terrorism.
See above. This article and its writer have no credibility. Its one guy maintaining a website with a few articles. None of the contributors are credentialed. Credentials are important.
Does not take away from the fact that the Palestinians want it. You could similarly discredit Israeli identity by saying it all started only in the 20th century as a European project. Does not take away from the fact that Israelis want it. These types of reasonings dont reflect the reality of today.Involvement of KGB in the Middle East and with all possible liberation movements as a tool to work against the West is a known fact.
Indeed, there are no hostages in Lebanon. Why would Israel attack Lebanon ? Quite a puzzling dilemmaIf you don't want Palestinians to resist the illegal occupation, end the occupation.
![]()
The reality is that Jews want to stay and Palis want them gone from the river to the sea. Hasn’t changed since before 1947 except back then Palis were called Arabs.Does not take away from the fact that the Palestinians want it. You could similarly discredit Israeli identity by saying it all started only in the 20th century as a European project. Does not take away from the fact that Israelis want it. These types of reasonings dont reflect the reality of today.
Debatable. Israelis ethnically cleansed Israel of Palestinians during the war in 48'. So one party is actually guilty and the other guilty of a thought crime, if true. These speculations will not bring peace.The reality is that Jews want to stay and Palis want them gone. Hasn’t changed since before 1947 except then Palis were called Arabs.
Nope it’s a fact. Even if it’s inconvenient to you.This is a conspiracy theory.
Was October 7 a thought crime?Debatable. Israelis ethnically cleansed Israel of Palestinians during the war in 48'. So one party is actually guilty and the other guilty of a thought crime, if true. These speculations will not bring peace.
So the KGB gave money and trained these militant groups? They dont seem to have been responsible for the creation of the Palestinian identity as someone else alluded. The identity has existed for a while.Nope it’s a fact. Even if it’s inconvenient to you.
in 1969, Yasser Arafat became a chairman of the PLO. Consequently, diplomatic connections with sufficient political reach were instituted. After that, it became clear in the West that Arafat accounted for an essential undercover operative for the KGBfor years to come.[6][7]
By the 1970s, with the loss of Soviet influence in Egypt, the Soviet Union sought better relations with Palestinian militants, and Soviet arms and training were provided to militant groups.
The KGB was responsible for arming and training most of the militant groups. The KGBdecided which groups should receive the money and weapons. By 1972, the Soviets had declared the Palestinian movement the vanguard of the Arab liberation movement.[8] In the summer of 1974, a PLO embassy was opened in Moscow.[9] During this time Yasser Arafat had addressed the United Nations and soon the PLO was granted observer status at the UN in 1974.
It was not an ethnic cleansing which is what I thought you alluded to when you said the Palis want the Jews gone.Was October 7 a thought crime?
So how would you qualify it? A friendly neighborly prank?It was not an ethnic cleansing which is what I thought you alluded to when you said the Palis want the Jews gone.
When has that identity begun? In Soviet UN speeches around 1947 two parties are called Jews and arabs. Palestinians would have meant both of those.So the KGB gave money and trained these militant groups? They dont seem to have been responsible for the creation of the Palestinian identity as someone else alluded. The identity has existed for a while.
A terrorist attack.So how would you qualify it? A friendly neighborly prank?
Atleast as early as 1920 when the entire region was called Mandatory Palestine.When has that identity begun? In Soviet UN speeches around 1947 two parties are called Jews and arabs. Palestinians would have meant both of those.
That’s meaningless because it includes Jews and arabs and christians who lived in Levant.Atleast as early as 1920 when the entire region was called Mandatory Palestine.
The first written records referring to Palestine emerged in the 12th-century BCE Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt, which used the term Peleset for a neighboring people or land.![]()
Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Palestine (region) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Maybe we can agree on 1964 when the PLO was formed? Which makes for atleast 3 generations of Palestinians. We can also agree that it exists today in a very real sense?The issue is when Palestinian arabs become different from other arabs?
That sounds about rightMaybe we can agree on 1964 when the PLO was formed? Which makes for atleast 3 generations of Palestinians. We can also agree that it exists today in a very real sense?