He did not falsify business records?Pretty much felony jaywalking.![]()
He was found guilty of the same in a court of law.
Suddenly the rule of law does not matter anymore!
He did not falsify business records?Pretty much felony jaywalking.![]()
no really tell meWell you're kind of taking a heel turn...Oracle ducks for cover.
Oh, Kelly, in a real fight i will put my bets on JosephineI resent this meme even thought I laughed because it shouldnāt even be a fight. Thatās like Jake Paul and Mike Tyson ugh
So apply the rule of law, and deport violent criminals.
And strengthen border security at the same time. I am not proposing an open border.
For the 11M pre-existing illegal immigrants, this so called rule of law has not been applied for many decades.
It is legally complicated as well as they have ties to the land now.
So deporting them under the guise of applying the rule of law, is not really about the application of the rule of law if we are being honest.
The real intent is far right blood and soil nationalism.
When your choice is between helping someone who is otherwise an upstanding citizen become legal residents vs destroying their families, choosing the latter, is not an intent to apply rule of law, but to purposefully hurt people.
Hence dangerous.
Instead, as you have suggested, in your second point here, give them a legal path to citizenship (or another status that is legal).
Combined with deportation of criminals and stronger borders, it would reduce illegal immigration in the future while avoiding a humanitarian crisis in the present.
Nothing radical here.
It is quite common to enact new laws, repeal old ones, modify old ones.
I am proposing to enact new ones and modify old ones and then apply them.
It does not go against your strict "rule of law" argument.
Beyond this I am not going to keep repeating this.
I believe I have said this enough number of times
Making stuff up are we?What he did was over inflate the values of a number of properties. This is a common practice in real estate and literally happens daily. If the estimate is deemed to be irrationally high you receive a fine. Unless your name is Trump and the government is trying to weaponize the justice system for political gain. Don't worry, his record will be clean in 5,4,3,2.....
LOL. Cringe.Oh, Kelly, in a real fight i will put my bets on Josephine![]()
No no no. Clinch, not cringe haha Sorry i am mixing a cheap cardboard red wine with even cheaper cardboard white wine. Cats are not supposed to drink so much wine, not in their 70s for sure...LOL. Cringe.
Kelly hopes your delulu doesnt become trululuOh, Kelly, in a real fight i will put my bets on Josephine![]()
I love this one.Kelly hopes your delulu doesnt become trululu
Well you don't seem too nice.Do you think I am psychopathic?
Nioce, when she wants to be?She's hot and smart. And nice when she wants to be.
I don't know you, just that you definitely didn't show any empathy here.Do you think I am psychopathic?
Not ready to admit that I was right just yet, I see.Lots of work to do before January 20th, so I won't be around.
I did want to see how crazy the gloating and weird conspiracy theorizing got, though, and you all did not disappoint on a number of threads.
I will try to drop the remaining open picture tabs I have on you all over the next week, but not promises.
Assuming all goes well, I will probably be back in February.
You all have fun!
I dont have to trash this low life.your entire motive for being here is to trash our great leader and your intentions are transparent.
actually some violent criminals will be legal citizens so that wont workSo apply the rule of law, and deport violent criminals.
sure you areAnd strengthen border security at the same time. I am not proposing an open border.
sure it hasFor the 11M pre-existing illegal immigrants, this so called rule of law has not been applied for many decades.
no they don'tIt is legally complicated as well as they have ties to the land now.
dont be stupidSo deporting them under the guise of applying the rule of law, is not really about the application of the rule of law if we are being honest.
The real intent is far right blood and soil nationalism.
they are not citizens, upstanding or notWhen your choice is between helping someone who is otherwise an upstanding citizen become legal residents vs destroying their families, choosing the latter, is not an intent to apply rule of law, but to purposefully hurt people.
what is dangerous is not applying the rule of law equally and consistently as that permits criminals to self justify breaking the law at their convivenceHence dangerous.
nobody said illegals immigrants cant apply before are they caught, processed and deportedInstead, as you have suggested, in your second point here, give them a legal path to citizenship (or another status that is legal).
deporting all the illegal immigrants would also reduce illegal immigration in the future and right quicklyCombined with deportation of criminals and stronger borders, it would reduce illegal immigration in the future while avoiding a humanitarian crisis in the present.
sure there isNothing radical here.
it sure isIt is quite common to enact new laws, repeal old ones, modify old ones.
propose awayI am proposing to enact new ones and modify old ones and then apply them.
sure it doesIt does not go against your strict "rule of law" argument.
yes sadly you do not appear to be cluing inBeyond this I am not going to keep repeating this.
I believe I have said this enough number of times
I think its because the USA is the worlds most powerful country and our neighbor to the south. The dont care about canada because we are perceived as a weak countryThe ālaugh in the faceā type behaviour is a bit immature - sure but I donāt get those in Canada who think this is somehow ātheirā win too. Canada is not America. It was not our race. I just donāt get it. You will never see an America call another counties election a victory even if the person they felt was the better candidate won. It just boggles my mind. Seeing Trump or Harris signs in Canada too. I just donāt get it.![]()
Flunkys gotta flunky."Our" great leader?
Modern China doesn't fit neatly into the Western concept of the political left/right spectrum.Yeah Stalin or Castro would be a good cut off point for the far left.'
And one leftist country that is successful? China.