Please share with us what Justin did to be a "dictator in spirit"
If you are going to trot out freezing bank accounts, please don't. He was begged by the Provinicial Goverment to step in and clear out the twats from Ottawa. So go ahead, besides COVID which was a unique first-time seen virus causing all countries to take special measures, please show us where Justin had dictatorial tendencies? Unless of course, you support illegal occupation of a city. We know the folks in Ottawa were miffed with Pee Pee and trounced his foul ass out.
I suspect you see Trumpy as a democratic loving leader, just a hunch.
Hmmm, let's see,
1. claiming he is going to use the "notwithstanding clause"
2. Framing media as biased ala Fake News Trumputin style and attempting to quash CBC because it's red meat to his whining base
3. Undermining trust in institutions: Poilievre often frames institutions like the Bank of Canada, the media, and federal bureaucracies as corrupt or incompetent. He claimed he would fire the Governor of the Bank of Canada, which is unprecedented and seen as an attack on central bank independence.
Now, having posted these points, I do not believe Pee Pee would have attempted to be a dictator. He was gracious in his loss to Carney and did concede, although he did not call Bruce Fanjoy to concede and congratulate him on his victory. He was also very well behaved during the debates and very friendly after the debate with the other leaders. If he had shown this side of himself, not prop up the convoy twats, not be an asshole to media asking the tough questions, not threaten to fire civil servants and kill the CBC, he may have been PM today.
Interesting that you wrote an effortpoast refuting things I have not said. FTR I was
never supportive of the manner in which those convoy protests were carried out. I don’t like protests that disrupt law and order. It seems to me, especially these days, they’re morally bankrupt, and have become no better than a filthy music festival. They’re just having a great time being morally self righteous parrots. We live in the age of lightning fast information — we have far more power as citizens simply producing and disseminating compelling discourse, and we don’t need to rage out to be heard.
It is very hard for me to see protests in this style as morally defensible acts of freedom. If I hated BLM, I’m kind of committed to hating any kind of protest that is analogous, and I do, believe me. I also hated when those kids toppled the statue and rolled the head into the fucking lake because of historical crimes against our aboriginal people, and I was disgusted they wanted to rename Ryerson X university too. I hated that illegal immigrants had a flaccid protest here about their immigration status. They weren’t even disruptive. I could list more, but I think you know where I’m going with that.
I am a careful communicator — I said, verbatim, he was a dictator
in spirit. This implies that he did not do anything sufficient for me call him an actual dictator
in practice. I could cite instances but since I made a character assessment, it’s more efficient to simply point to a broad definition of sorts.
Justin Trudeau displayed the traits of a man who deeply desired the power to make unilateral decisions and had a punitive impulse towards people who opposed those desires. So does Trump. He consistently — some might say, officially and flagrantly — attempted to thought police others via regulations on our media consumption. He thought policed and affirmed thought policing under the guise of human rights discourse. (Much like a lot of you.)
“Disinformation”, pffft. More like
no information.
You guys love your dEmOcRacY right? What sort of democracy is possible when people are blocked from getting the broadest range of information to make the weighty decisions that are required of an electorate that can fully meet their civic duties? Should such an impoverished society be allowed to choose their rulers? If Trudeau presides as a leader of a democratic nation, and also engages in acts that are violent to the spirit — no, the
necessary conditions — of democracy then surely he is leaning authoritarian, no? Surely, we can agree on this.
You know who else are dictators
in spirit? Toddlers. Trudeau and Trump behave like petulant children regularly. Trump is merely more honest about it.
….
Some additional unsolicited info about me, since you didn’t care to ask:
As much as people here assume I love Trump, and call me a MAGAcunt, Nazi, KKK Kelly (lol) etc. I don’t agree with him on many things. I actually think he’s a crazy old coot, and an almost insufferable boor. That said, I’m fairly Trump neutral. I just don’t think he’s evil or
necessarily bad for America, I think he fits the American spirit LOL. I’ve only ever said that people are too quick to call him evil and fundamentally ill intended. I am not some MAGAtard who sits around watching reels and shorts of repetitious edgelord right wing grifters, TYVM.
I didn’t bother correcting anyone because it is funny to be called that stuff, and the long game is that my political opponents make themselves look dumb repeatedly, thus losing power in their words and making me seem rational, idk.
I’ve said it upthread, and I repeat, I am decidedly not anti-authoritarian. I believe in benevolent dictatorship, at least in principle. I could provide a principled argument for this, but I’d be plagiarizing. Go read some Moldbug or something, idk. Or
The Republic, even. Conversely you could maybe reconsider whether YOU have a principled argument for democracy. See where that seemingly unconscionable line of thought takes you.
It will get you farther away from regurgitating boomer news and closer to being an autonomously thinking being, that’s for sure. Something more fitting of citizen who lives in a democracy.
…you know how to avoid these pesky misunderstandings, and not waste your time refuting something that hasn’t ever been said? You should ask questions of the people you are speaking to.
Interpreting another’s arguments charitably is literally a core principle of being rational. You guys like to rationality right? Look into it. Stop caricaturizing your moral and intellectual opponents. It is intellectually impoverishing, lazy, and incurious.