Donald Trumps Approval Ratings Soar

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,972
5,600
113
Mussolini was Prime minister 1922 to 1925, and then El Duce until his end in 1943
 
  • Like
Reactions: jalimon

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
53,865
11,785
113
Toronto
Then they have to be flown back to wherever they come from. We're talking potential cost in the billions of $$$.
I'm not sure what your problem is. That money can be easily recouped by decreased funding for healthcare and education.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,842
4,210
113
Trump’s approval rating soars???


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- At 47%, President Donald Trump's initial job approval rating for his second term is similar to the inaugural 45% reading during his first term, again placing him below all other elected presidents dating back to 1953.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
Trump’s approval rating soars???


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- At 47%, President Donald Trump's initial job approval rating for his second term is similar to the inaugural 45% reading during his first term, again placing him below all other elected presidents dating back to 1953.
Trump is getting more and more popular with Mitchell. That's the only thing that counts!
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
I'm not sure what your problem is. That money can be easily recouped by decreased funding for healthcare and education.
I'm sure those plans are being worked on as we speak!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
Given that Trump is following in the footsteps of Mussolini, Melania better make sure she avoids the fate of Clara.
I'm sure Melania will be safely off in her European penthouse apartment with 2 or 3 toy boys during the whole thing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
Will Trump also finish like Mussolini? Mussolini was a strong bully idiot leader, quite similar to Trumpy. But he had a short tenure as people had enough of him.
Yeah, it makes you wonder how the folks who like dictators can't make better choices in their leaders. Trump is really fucking stupid.

But then take Hitler:

High school grad, no college.
Failed artist
Bum for about a decade in Vienna
Never promoted during world war one. Too stupid.
Tries to stage an insurrection in a beer hall and gets arrested and sent to jail
Spends a year or so in jail
Becomes dictator (????!!!!! - Why the fuck?!?!?!?!)
Declares war for no apparent reason
Decides it's a great idea to invade Russia and then fights Russia, the USA and the British Empire (all stronger than Germany), all at the same time.

SMH
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
38,608
79,579
113
I don't think you can EO that you have immunity from lawsuits re firing someone and then fire them a week later..... ;)
To be fair, that isn't what they did.
I think it was more "reclassify workers to the type you can fire, then fire them".

That said, from what I am hearing, they didn't even do that, so lawsuits may be the future here. (And then we get back to "how corrupt is the judiciary right now?" as the issue.)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
To be fair, that isn't what they did.
I think it was more "reclassify workers to the type you can fire, then fire them".

That said, from what I am hearing, they didn't even do that, so lawsuits may be the future here. (And then we get back to "how corrupt is the judiciary right now?" as the issue.)
I think either way, Trump can't do it.

I suspect the judicial analysis is going to be that the initial "un fire-able" category will be held to be the governing employment contract between the parties and the re classification and firing will be held to be a continuing breach of the contract by the admin.

Just like you can't take a 10-year employee, re classify him to "probationary" and then fire him in the private sector. It's a laughably transparent turd-chunk of fuckery that most judges would take delight in feeding back down the throat of the fuckering employer with an extra heavy dose of punitive damages for "bad faith firing".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
38,608
79,579
113
Trump doesn't care. The Dems tried to assassinate Trump twice, bankrupt him, put him in jail etc. However, Trump still became the president and is now playing with "house" money. I'm glad that Trump is starting to get much needed revenge on the Dems!!
One thing I do like about you and some of the others here is that you don't pretend things are anything other than vengeance and petty abuse of power.
It's nice to not have to deal with someone pretending Trump is about patriotism or helping people.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
One thing I do like about you and some of the others here is that you don't pretend things are anything other than vengeance and petty abuse of power.
It's nice to not have to deal with someone pretending Trump is about patriotism or helping people.
In Mitch's defence: Since posting on TERB a generous amount, the hospital staff have noticed that Mitch's hostility level has decreased. His physical attacks on ward staff - whom Mitch refers to as the "Deep State" - have decreased noticeably. Although he has taken to calling an Afro-Canadian senior nurse "Kamala Bitch Harris", this is believed to be a passing symptom of his condition.

And Mitch only followed co-patients around the security ward howling and barking at them on 3 occasions in the last week, a dramatic reduction wrt his previous more extreme symptomatology. For Mitch's continued recovery, posting on TERB is considered a significant therapeutic activity.

Staff did have to confiscate the bleach blond wig that Mitch had taken to wearing 24/7 however. This was done for hygienic reasons, as it had developed a strong and distasteful odour.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,464
8,500
113
Binational poll: Most Canadians and many Americans oppose Canada joining the U.S.

Nearly all Canadians (77%) strongly or somewhat oppose Canada becoming part of the U.S., while 15% of Canadians support it, new YouGov polls in Canada and the U.S. find. Support for Canada joining the U.S. is stronger in the U.S., but more Americans oppose the idea (42%) than support it (36%).

The prospect of Canada joining the U.S. has come up repeatedly over the centuries, including proposals for peaceful mergers and for military conquest. It was proposed most recently by U.S. President Donald Trump, and has been criticized by Canadian leaders.


I guess that the Trumptards on this Board fall in the 15% category!!
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
Binational poll: Most Canadians and many Americans oppose Canada joining the U.S.

Nearly all Canadians (77%) strongly or somewhat oppose Canada becoming part of the U.S., while 15% of Canadians support it, new YouGov polls in Canada and the U.S. find. Support for Canada joining the U.S. is stronger in the U.S., but more Americans oppose the idea (42%) than support it (36%).

The prospect of Canada joining the U.S. has come up repeatedly over the centuries, including proposals for peaceful mergers and for military conquest. It was proposed most recently by U.S. President Donald Trump, and has been criticized by Canadian leaders.


I guess that the Trumptards on this Board fall in the 15% category!!
I understand that Trump has promised Mitch he can be president of Canada when Trump takes over.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
I'm not sure there will be.
There are some strange rules about who can be fired how in the Federal government and that was also one of the things Trump immediately EO'd.

I don't know enough about where her current position falls to say whether she does or does not have a case,
Is this the infamous "Schedule F" that I just discovered in wiki, as a link to the Project 2025 wiki page??

 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
87,314
134,015
113
The problem with most of the Project 2025 stuff is that it requires control of Congress to actually get done and this hasn't happened.

EO's enacted to push Project 2025 are almost all going to be ultra vires and unconstitutional and are going to get struck down within a few days by the bench. (Unless the higher judiciary is completely corrupt. And we've already exchanged opinions on that topic).

So far, all I am seeing is an annoying old man who is massively far out of his depth as a legislator and who is making a total fool of himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danmand
Toronto Escorts