United Healthcare CEO shot and killed in Manhattan

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,656
9,290
113
Let's expand on your position. Your argument is that when gun violence targets a CEO instead of a gang member or other innocent people it's somehow different?
Yes.
It is different.
A targeted shooting of a CEO whose business practices caused the deaths and sufferings of millions is much different than a shooting that targets a school full of children.
They are both illegal.
They are both murders.
But they are not morally equivalent.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,885
11,359
113
Room 112
Yes, it is. Just like killing a dictator.


Great video of recent reaction. He is becoming John Brown.

Best line one girl says she had "tears running down her legs"......
You generally make sense on most issues but on this one you are so off. You're actually morally justifying taking someone's life simply because their company's business practices are, at least on the surface, questionable. We cannot take that stand or nobody will want to run a large company. Being a CEO is a very challenging position and the sacrifices one makes to do that job are tremendous. You're basically on call 24/7/365, your life is your work. It affects your personal relationships. Many are in therapy. Yet we have folks who sit around and bitch about how this CEO made $10 million last year (most of it non cash), yet nobody blinks an eye when a mediocre NBA player pulls in a similar salary or a movie actor makes $18 million for 3 months of work on the set. What kind of fucking cosmic bunny hole have we fallen into here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bucktee

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
You generally make sense on most issues but on this one you are so off. You're actually morally justifying taking someone's life simply because their company's business practices are, at least on the surface, questionable. We cannot take that stand or nobody will want to run a large company. Being a CEO is a very challenging position and the sacrifices one makes to do that job are tremendous. You're basically on call 24/7/365, your life is your work. It affects your personal relationships. Many are in therapy. Yet we have folks who sit around and bitch about how this CEO made $10 million last year (most of it non cash), yet nobody blinks an eye when a mediocre NBA player pulls in a similar salary or a movie actor makes $18 million for 3 months of work on the set. What kind of fucking cosmic bunny hole have we fallen into here?
It's not about how much money. It's about the decisions he made to deny 32% of claims, double the national average. To illegally use an AI instead of an actual doctor that was 90% wrong to facilitate the denials.

Imagine if OHIP did that, to save money. And it was your child denied coverage for a life saving, or changing procedure.

He was the CEO and therefore signed off on every policy that harmed policy holders. I have no sympathy, anymore than a chemical product CEO who illegally dumped into a water table toxic chemicals. Or to Tobacco company CEO's. Or that family that lied to Congress about the addictiveness of Opiods.

What he did was sociopathic. Downright evil.

Run it better.

But the fact is the insurance game is a gambling operation. They bet on taking money and not having to pay out. That is thevliteral business model. So the literal business model of health insurance is not to supply coverage, but to deny it. It's a fake middleman

And no one forced him into the position. So no, I have no sympathy for him anymore than any other drifter. Just because they have the title CEO doesn't morally absolve them.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,885
11,359
113
Room 112
It's not about how much money. It's about the decisions he made to deny 32% of claims, double the national average. To illegally use an AI instead of an actual doctor that was 90% wrong to facilitate the denials.

Imagine if OHIP did that, to save money. And it was your child denied coverage for a life saving, or changing procedure.

He was the CEO and therefore signed off on every policy that harmed policy holders. I have no sympathy, anymore than a chemical product CEO who illegally dumped into a water table toxic chemicals. Or to Tobacco company CEO's. Or that family that lied to Congress about the addictiveness of Opiods.

What he did was sociopathic. Downright evil.

Run it better.

But the fact is the insurance game is a gambling operation. They bet on taking money and not having to pay out. That is thevliteral business model. So the literal business model of health insurance is not to supply coverage, but to deny it. It's a fake middleman

And no one forced him into the position. So no, I have no sympathy for him anymore than any other drifter. Just because they have the title CEO doesn't morally absolve them.
Hate to burst your bubble but OHIP denies coverage. Maybe not as frequently as 32% but it does. Particularly if you're over 80 years old. And as I said before you're just looking at a figure and not what drives that denial rate. You need to separate your emotions from the reality.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
Hate to burst your bubble but OHIP denies coverage. Maybe not as frequently as 32% but it does. Particularly if you're over 80 years old. And as I said before you're just looking at a figure and not what drives that denial rate. You need to separate your emotions from the reality.
They deny based on a doctor diagnosis. Not to enrich shareholders.

Stop being so emotional for profits. And yes, it's OK to care about people first.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,885
11,359
113
Room 112
They deny based on a doctor diagnosis. Not to enrich shareholders.

Stop being so emotional for profits. And yes, it's OK to care about people first.
The profit motive is intrinsically the best mechanism for getting the best product or service delivered. That's what has made capitalism work for hundreds of years. At the end of the day health care is a commodity, just like an automobile. And therein lies the tradeoff - get superior healthcare but at a premium cost or get average to substandard health care with relatively less expense.

I am not being emotional at all, other than I feel for the guys two kids who have lost their dad and have to read awful things said about him. And believe me I am no fan of insurance companies, I've had to fight with mine on a couple of occasions. If its is deemed that United was denying claims to insured based solely on profit then the company should be severely punished. They are violating their contractual obligation to their customer and if that is a serial problem the market will eventually collapse.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: mandrill

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,586
11,467
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Hate to burst your bubble but OHIP denies coverage. Maybe not as frequently as 32% but it does. Particularly if you're over 80 years old. And as I said before you're just looking at a figure and not what drives that denial rate. You need to separate your emotions from the reality.
What services are covered for people under 80 that are not covered for people over 80?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
The profit motive is intrinsically the best mechanism for getting the best product or service delivered. That's what has made capitalism work for hundreds of years. At the end of the day health care is a commodity, just like an automobile. And therein lies the tradeoff - get superior healthcare but at a premium cost or get average to substandard health care with relatively less expense.

I am not being emotional at all, other than I feel for the guys two kids who have lost their dad and have to read awful things said about him. And believe me I am no fan of insurance companies, I've had to fight with mine on a couple of occasions. If its is deemed that United was denying claims to insured based solely on profit then the company should be severely punished. They are violating their contractual obligation to their customer and if that is a serial problem the market will eventually collapse.
There it is.

Healthcare is not a commodity in Canada. It is more a human right.

So what you are saying is if a child gets leukemia and the parents can't afford to pay for it you think the child should be left to die without treatment.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,885
11,359
113
Room 112
What services are covered for people under 80 that are not covered for people over 80?
The healthcare system looks at the person's age as being a factor as to whether they authorize any major procedure, whether it be heart surgery or knee/hip replacement. I had a former client who was 84 and needed a hip replaced. OHIP stalled him for over a year and just kept him drugged up, hoping he would just croak. But he said f that and went to the US and got the hip replaced. He's still alive today in his early 90's.

One of the main issues with delivery of public goods is the free rider problem. This occurs when one derives a benefit without paying or under paying for it. This results in inefficiency and scarcity of resources as a whole. That results in the provider of the public good or service being selective on who gets priority delivery - a 45 year old who has 20 years of working life remaining to pay taxes into the system, or the 85 year old who is getting CPP and OAS but is paying less tax into the system than what he is getting in benefits. It sucks but it is the reality in our current system.
 

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
8,377
9,093
113
The healthcare system looks at the person's age as being a factor as to whether they authorize any major procedure, whether it be heart surgery or knee/hip replacement. I had a former client who was 84 and needed a hip replaced. OHIP stalled him for over a year and just kept him drugged up, hoping he would just croak. But he said f that and went to the US and got the hip replaced. He's still alive today in his early 90's.

One of the main issues with delivery of public goods is the free rider problem. This occurs when one derives a benefit without paying or under paying for it. This results in inefficiency and scarcity of resources as a whole. That results in the provider of the public good or service being selective on who gets priority delivery - a 45 year old who has 20 years of working life remaining to pay taxes into the system, or the 85 year old who is getting CPP and OAS but is paying less tax into the system than what he is getting in benefits. It sucks but it is the reality in our current system.
Should have come to Quebec. Hip replacements are much cheaper than in the US in the private sector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
10,586
11,467
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
The healthcare system looks at the person's age as being a factor as to whether they authorize any major procedure, whether it be heart surgery or knee/hip replacement. I had a former client who was 84 and needed a hip replaced. OHIP stalled him for over a year and just kept him drugged up, hoping he would just croak. But he said f that and went to the US and got the hip replaced. He's still alive today in his early 90's.

One of the main issues with delivery of public goods is the free rider problem. This occurs when one derives a benefit without paying or under paying for it. This results in inefficiency and scarcity of resources as a whole. That results in the provider of the public good or service being selective on who gets priority delivery - a 45 year old who has 20 years of working life remaining to pay taxes into the system, or the 85 year old who is getting CPP and OAS but is paying less tax into the system than what he is getting in benefits. It sucks but it is the reality in our current system.
I’m sorry but I have a hard time believing that he was denied a hip replacement because he was 85. Like that was the specific reason. I personally need more then “I knew I guy….” As evidence. Do you have any stats? Anything in writing where they say they will deny services?
 
Last edited:

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
30,171
7,652
113
He might get the death penalty

Now confirmed.

DA will seek death penalty

 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
32,886
6,579
113
  • Like
Reactions: optimusprime69

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
30,171
7,652
113
It's going to make the OJ trial coverage look like a local news cast
I really wish this trial would be broadcast live on Court TV, but it doesnt look like it will be
 

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
821
797
93
So if he is acquitted, or if there are a sufficient number of hung juries with no convictions, will society go ahead and have The Purge, just like the movie?

For everyone, especially those of you who seem to like this piece of shit, who would you kill in The Purge?

Executives in specific industries?

Teachers who were mean to you in school?

Potential romantic partners who rejected your overtures?

Sex workers aren’t cheap, so many of the guys here have a buck or two earned in business.

Think anyone you climbed over on the way to the top wants to kill you?

Maybe instead of The Purge, he is found guilty and they televise it. Ratings would be good if they do it while he is still good looking.

The U.S. is a sick society. He made is sicker. No sympathy for him from me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bucktee
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts