COP30 pushes through uneasy climate deal that sidesteps fossil fuel concerns

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,927
2,942
113
Ghawar
Nov 22, 2025

Brazil's COP30 presidency pushed through a compromise climate deal on Saturday that would boost finances for poor nations coping with global warming but omitted any mention of the fossil fuels driving it.

In securing the accord, Brazil had attempted to demonstrate global unity in addressing climate change impacts even after the world's biggest historic emitter, the United States, declined to send an official delegation.

But the agreement, which landed in overtime after two weeks of contentious negotiations in the Amazon city of Belém, exposed deep rifts over how future climate action should be pursued.

After gavelling the deal through, André Corrêa do Lago, president of this year's conference, acknowledged the talks had been tough.

"We know some of you had greater ambitions for some of the issues at hand," he said.

Several countries objected to the summit ending without stronger plans for reining in greenhouse gases or addressing fossil fuels.

Some of the criticism came from Brazil's neighbours in Latin America, with multiple objections made by Colombia, Panama and Uruguay, before Corrêa do Lago suspended the plenary for further consultations.

Noting that fossil fuels were by far the biggest contributor of planet-warming emissions, Colombia's negotiator said her country could not go along with a deal that ignored science.

"A consensus imposed under climate denialism is a failed agreement," the Colombian negotiator said.

The three countries said they objected not to COP30's overall political deal but to one of the other more technical negotiating texts that countries had been due to approve at the summit's end, alongside the headline deal.

The three had joined the European Union demanding the agreement include language on a transition away from fossil fuels — while a coalition of countries, including top oil exporter Saudi Arabia, said any mention of fossil fuels was off limits.

After tense overnight negotiations, the EU agreed on Saturday morning not to block a final deal but said it did not agree with the conclusion.

"We should support [the deal] because at least it is going in the right direction," EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra told reporters before it was sealed.

Panama's climate negotiator, Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, said before the final plenary that his country was not happy with the summit result.

"A climate decision that cannot even say 'fossil fuels' is not neutrality, it is complicity. And what is happening here transcends incompetence," he said.

'I fear the world still fell short'
The summit also launches a voluntary initiative to speed up climate action to help countries meet their existing pledges to reduce emissions and calls for rich nations to at least triple the amount of money they provide to help developing countries adapt to a warming world by 2035.

Developing countries have argued they urgently need funds to adapt to impacts that are already hitting, like rising sea levels and worsening heat waves, droughts, floods and storms.

Avinash Persaud, special adviser to the president of the Inter-American Development Bank, a multilateral lender focused on Latin America and the Caribbean, said the accord's focus on finance was important as climate impacts mount.

"But I fear the world still fell short on more rapid-release grants for developing countries responding to loss and damage. That goal is as urgent as it is hard," Persaud said.

Several countries including Sierra Leone also objected at the final plenary to a watering down of what they should be measuring in areas such as food security in order to prepare for climate impacts.

The delegate from Sierra Leone said the list of indicators agreed "is not the list crafted by experts and is not a list that clearly tells our story."

"Instead, we leave COP with indicators that are unclear, unmeasurable, and in many cases, unusable. So we must ask ourselves, how are we helping the most vulnerable if this is the quality of the outcomes we call ambition?" Jiwoh Emmanuel Abdulai, Sierra Leone's climate minister, said.

EU, Arab group at odds over fossil fuels
The overnight impasse between the European Union and the Arab group of nations over fossil fuels had pushed the talks past a Friday deadline, triggering all-night negotiations before a compromise could be reached.

Corrêa do Lago, COP30's president, said on Saturday morning that the presidency was issuing a side text on fossil fuels — as well as on protecting forests — keeping it out of the main accord because of the lack of consensus.

But he urged countries to keep discussing the issues.

Saturday's agreement also launches a process for climate bodies to review how to align international trade with climate action, according to the deal text, amid concerns that rising trade barriers are limiting the adoption of clean technology.

 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,882
186
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
There is a real opportunity for Carney to lead Canada to a net zero economy that thrives.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,927
2,942
113
Ghawar
There is a real opportunity for Carney to lead Canada to a net zero economy that thrives.
it is that real opportunity that scared Carney away from attending the conference.
He knew people wouldn't buy his lies about zero emission. Better let his climate
stooges Guilbeault and Dabrusin to do the job of spinning Canada's role of climate
leadership. .
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
105,903
31,247
113
it is that real opportunity that scared Carney away from attending the conference.
He knew people wouldn't buy his lies about zero emission. Better let his climate
stooges Guilbeault and Dabrusin to do the job of spinning Canada's role of climate
leadership. .
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,927
2,942
113
Ghawar
This is readily apparent at present.
What is not apparent is that it is actually apparent to leaders
of the likes of Carney who knows the sumptuous reward of growing
fossil fuel production better than climate sheeple who voted him
to save the world from climate catastrophe. Zero-emission economy
is not the goal. It is a deception employed by politicians to score
political gains.
 
  • Love
Reactions: The Oracle

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,927
2,942
113
Ghawar
‘Inviting the Fox Into the Henhouse’: Canada Delegation to COP30 Loaded with Fossil Fuel Representatives

Nov 13, 2025

Lobbyists and representatives of Canada’s oil and gas industry are part of Canada’s official delegation to this year’s U.N. climate talks in Brazil, in keeping with the high number of fossil fuel representatives in attendance at the summit.


About a dozen individuals representing fossil fuel interests were part of the 240-person Canadian delegation, according to documents reviewed by DeSmog as well as a Nov. 12 Canadian Press article.


“Fossil fuel lobbyists have no place at the U.N. climate negotiations,” Emilia Belliveau, program manager of energy transition with Environmental Defence, said in a statement to DeSmog.


“Their presence here with official badges from Canada undermines the work of Canadians attending COP30 who are genuinely working to advance climate action,” she said.

This year’s U.N. climate talks have the single largest share of fossil fuel lobbyists in attendance to date. Some 1,600 people — or one out of every 25 attendees — are fossil industry or related lobbyists, according to an analysis by Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO), an alliance of climate and justice organizations that push to remove fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists from influencing climate negotiations and policymaking.


The presence of so many Canadian fossil fuel sector representatives exemplifies the report’s findings.

“It demonstrates the extent by which the current government is aligned with oil industry interests,” Patrick Bonin, the Bloc Québécois’ environment and climate change critic, said in a statement to DeSmog.


“The oil and gas industry is the biggest lobby in Canada,” Bonin continued, “so it’s like inviting the fox into the henhouse … Giving them access to the delegation gives them far greater influence than regular participants.”


Fossil fuel lobbyists in the Canadian delegation include representatives of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), a lobby group that represents Canada’s oil and natural gas producers; Tourmaline Oil, Canada’s largest natural gas producer; CarbonAi; the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), the Global CCS Institute; and the gas industry advocacy group Energy for a Secure Future.

Huge Industry Presence

KBPO’s analysis reveals that fossil fuel lobbyists at COP30 outnumber every national delegation except for Brazil, the host country. The number of lobbyists also represents a 12 percent increase over last year’s COP conference held in Baku, Azerbaijan.


Fossil fuel lobbyists received two-thirds more passes to COP30 than the total number of delegates from the 10 most climate-affected nations on Earth, the KBPO report said. This highlights “how industry presence continues to dwarf that of those on the frontlines of the climate crisis,” KBPO said in a statement that accompanied the report’s release.


The influence of major trade associations at COP30 is palpable, with the IETA bringing 60 representatives, including delegates from oil and gas giants ExxonMobil, BP, and TotalEnergies. These associations are “a primary vehicle for fossil fuel influence, according to a KBPO statement.


Kathleen Sullivan, global managing director with IETA, is in the COP30 Canadian delegation. It also includes Jay Averill, assistant vice president of communications with CAPP; Scott Volk and Tim Shaw of Tourmaline Oil; and Todd Smith, Ontario’s former energy minister who advocated for an expansion of nuclear power. Smith left office in August 2024 to become vice president of marketing and business development with CANDU Energy Inc., a manufacturer of nuclear reactors.


The Canadian delegation also includes several representatives from Energy for a Secure Future, a lobby group that advocates for continued fossil fuel use to ensure “energy affordability.” The group states on their website that “our gas energy can respond to the needs of our friends around the world who are facing punishing energy costs and are left with options that drive up global emissions.”

Canadian “Carbon Bombs”

However, Canada’s natural gas industry is a major contributor of rising global emissions. The nation’s natural gas resources have been described as “carbon bombs” for their potential to release billions of tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, according to a 2024 DeSmog article.


“The spectacle of Canada’s COP delegation [serving as] a Trojan horse for fossil fuel interests like Tourmaline and the CAPP is shocking,” said James Browning, executive director of F Minus, a climate accountability group. F Minus recently issued a report detailing numerous conflicts of interest that have resulted from Canadian environmental organization sharing lobbyists who also serve major polluters.

“Lobbying decisionmakers in secret is really just another day at the office for these climate denialists, given the failure of Canada’s lobbyist disclosure system to fully capture the extent of their dealings with Canadian officials,” Browning said in a statement to DeSmog.


“COP may be 5,000 kilometres away, but the deeper scandal here is that Tourmaline’s and CAPP’s lobbyists enjoy a similar, extraordinary level of secrecy in their meetings with government officials every day in Ottawa,” he said.


CAPP has misled the public about emissions from Canada’s oil and gas sector, and has campaigned against anti-greenwashing laws. Heather Feldbusch, one of Pierre Poilievre’s campaign’s inner circle, was formerly a lobbyist with Alberta Counsel Inc., which represents Tourmaline.

“At the COP negotiations two years ago, governments took a historic step by committing to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems in a just, orderly, and equitable manner,” Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada, said in a statement to DeSmog. “By including fossil fuel lobbyists in our official delegation, Canada is undermining that global effort and risks being seen as negotiating in bad faith.”


“CAPP has been fighting against effective climate action for decades and should be shown the door, not the red carpet,” he added.


Another organization with a stake in fossil fuels included in the Canadian delegation is the Global CCS Institute, a carbon capture advocacy group based in Australia. Critics have long argued that carbon capture is an expensive false solution designed to give fossil fuel production an air of social acceptability. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has used the term “low carbon oil” in reference to carbon capture, despite experts arguing that the term is nonsense.


“Inviting fossil fuel lobbyists into global climate negotiations is as misguided as letting the tobacco industry write health policy, and Canada is compounding the problem by weakening its own greenwashing rules” Sabaa Khan, director general, Quebec and Atlantic Canada, with the David Suzuki Foundation, said in a statement to DeSmog.


DeSmog reached out to Keean Nembhard, press secretary for Canadian environment minister Julie Dabrusin, but did not receive a statement by press time.

 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,221
4,578
113
‘Inviting the Fox Into the Henhouse’: Canada Delegation to COP30 Loaded with Fossil Fuel Representatives

Nov 13, 2025




you follow this website ?




Who we are
look at their team
not a not a scientist/ climatologist or meteorologist amongst them
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,221
4,578
113
‘Inviting the Fox Into the Henhouse’: Canada Delegation to COP30 Loaded with Fossil Fuel Representatives

Nov 13, 2025

Lobbyists and representatives of Canada’s oil and gas industry are part of Canada’s official delegation to this year’s U.N. climate talks in Brazil, in keeping with the high number of fossil fuel representatives in attendance at the summit.


About a dozen individuals representing fossil fuel interests were part of the 240-person Canadian delegation, according to documents reviewed by DeSmog as well as a Nov. 12 Canadian Press article.


“Fossil fuel lobbyists have no place at the U.N. climate negotiations,” Emilia Belliveau, program manager of energy transition with Environmental Defence, said in a statement to DeSmog.


“Their presence here with official badges from Canada undermines the work of Canadians attending COP30 who are genuinely working to advance climate action,” she said.

This year’s U.N. climate talks have the single largest share of fossil fuel lobbyists in attendance to date. Some 1,600 people — or one out of every 25 attendees — are fossil industry or related lobbyists, according to an analysis by Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO), an alliance of climate and justice organizations that push to remove fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists from influencing climate negotiations and policymaking.

so they think they are setting out the path forward for...... the entire planet
yet
its an exclusive gathering , where some are not welcome . let alone have the right to have their views heard
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
19,221
4,578
113
exclusive
off
exclusively irrational is your club of climate nutters

they refuse to even consider an alternative view point
they want to force their control onto others
they do not care who gets hurt by their actions
they defend their evil stating they are saving society / the planet
political objective displace facts/ science

hmmm 1950s communist Russia or 2020's climate zealots ?

when does the infighting and purges start?

oh wait Bill Gates kicked started that already
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
105,903
31,247
113
exclusively irrational is your club of climate nutters

they refuse to even consider an alternative view point
they want to force their control onto others
they do not care who gets hurt by their actions
they defend their evil stating they are saving society / the planet
political objective displace facts/ science

hmmm 1950s communist Russia or 2020's climate zealots ?

when does the infighting and purges start?

oh wait Bill Gates kicked started that
Your 'alternative viewpoint' is more crackpot than the antivaxxers, larue.
Nobody cares what an old crackpot like you says.

Listen to the IPCC, NASA or even the scientists at Exxon or Shell.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
105,903
31,247
113
He's a shoddy scientist, no wonder you like him.
Don't you find it sad that there are only 1 or 2 people with even the barest pretence at being legit on your side and this is as good as it gets?
I'd be embarrassed, but then I'm not a kook like you.


But hey, you argue that character assassination is only allowed on legit scientists, like NASA and the IPCC.
So just for you we've got a chart comparing the accuracy of Lindzen's predictions vs James Hansen.

Experimental proof, as you like to say.

 
Toronto Escorts