Kiki @ Angels Touch

Dougal Short · Mar 23, 2026

I found myself passing through Ottawa Sunday evening. Alpha and CMJ were either closed or nobody struck my fancy so I booked an hour with Kiki, based largely on her photos. I couldn't find any reviews, other than the real or imagined ones on their website.

So the upside:
*Booking was easy by email and confirmation was quick.
*Location is a little sketchy, but it was on the way.
*Kiki's photos appealed to me. Slim and toned.

On the downside
*She was over 10 minutes late coming to the room and the first words out of her mouth were "Have you been here before, and do you know how it works?" Part of me thought that sounded positive, and she was cute enough
*Unfortunately, she followed it with "Just so you know, I only do body slide and handjob, ok?" Since I was standing there all showered with a towel around me, I nodded.

Massage consisted of slopping some oil on my back and legs and rubbing it around, much like you'd spread butter around on your pancakes. Considering I'd been driving for hours, it wasn't horrible, but it also wasn't a massage. There was no tease or actual massage, but the conversation was pleasant enough. After about 20 minutes, she got naked, and I rolled over. More oil, bit of a BS, but she reiterated that I could touch, but not her "pussy or asshole". LOL so I played with her boobies a little and eventually she started playing around with the important stuff, which up to that point, had remained sound asleep.

Somewhere along the way I asked if a little DATY was available for an upcharge, That was promptly denied but she assumed a "Faux soixante-neuf" and she reminded me that I could "look but not touch". Shame really...

Anyway, she got the job done and it was out the door 50 minutes after I arrived, having spent more than I should have...

Anyway, nice girl, but for me anyway, very restrictive. Won't repeat.

Mdelisle6969 · Mar 24, 2026

useful review - thank you

SIRLOKI · Mar 24, 2026

That's the problem with not being allowed to properly review these hybrid places

mwchevy331 · Mar 24, 2026

Angels have been downhill over the last few years. The receptionist (and its welcoming) is far cry from the other spas. The girls are majority misses more than hits.

Dougal Short · Mar 24, 2026

I only ended up there because Alpha and CMJ were both closed. Don't get me wrong, she's a nice girl, but my expectations didn't line up with reality. And there's three reviews on her profile that all RAVE, including about her DFK skills. Maybe it was me, but her head never got more than an arms-length away from mine. ;-)

cck · Mar 25, 2026

Nope, that's a typical experience at AT/PS with most of the MAs there.

Dougal Short · Mar 25, 2026

cck said:
Nope, that's a typical experience at AT/PS with most of the MAs there.

Too bad. I was at Paradise years ago and had a rollicking good time.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 27, 2026

SIRLOKI said:
That's the problem with not being allowed to properly review these hybrid places

Maybe ask how you cannot properly review ? I’ve seen many reviews and I’ll say reviews are very one sided and on here and y’all trust that one person leaving the review.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 27, 2026

cck said:
Nope, that's a typical experience at AT/PS with most of the MAs there.

You Sir have not been to our Spa in years so please stop commenting. You have caused enough emotional damage on my girls.

ym7921 · Mar 28, 2026

oh oh the angels touch police is here guys. I'm sure the 2 users who made the comments and have been members for 17 and 22 years are totally lying and not the angels touch shill trying to protect her girls that keep on ripping of clients. shouldn't the admin be doing something about the blatant shilling from users?

lmao just had a gander at some of her previous comments. man no wonder some of these places have gone downhill if she is running them. old inaccurate photos, dirty towels, poor service and the hundreds of excuses instead of taking responsibility. what an eye opener.

guys apparently photos shoots are expensive but that means its totally ok to have inaccurate photos on the website. lol what did I read. if someone doesn't understand a basic concept of why accurate photos is important in this industry they have no business running a place but I guess it totally makes sense now why its gone so downhill.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 28, 2026

mwchevy331 said:
Angels have been downhill over the last few years. The receptionist (and its welcoming) is far cry from the other spas. The girls are majority misses more than hits.

ym7921 said:
oh oh the angels touch police is here guys. I'm sure the 2 users who made the comments and have been members for 17 and 22 years are totally lying and not the angels touch shill trying to protect her girls that keep on ripping of clients. shouldn't the admin be doing something about the blatant shilling from users?

lmao just had a gander at some of her previous comments. man no wonder some of these places have gone downhill if she is running them. old inaccurate photos, dirty towels, poor service and the hundreds of excuses instead of taking responsibility. what an eye opener.

guys apparently photos shoots are expensive but that means its totally ok to have inaccurate photos on the website. lol what did I read. if someone doesn't understand a basic concept of why accurate photos is important in this industry they have no business running a place but I guess it totally makes sense now why its gone so downhill.

Comments are merely comments, sir neither inherently right nor wrong. The real issue isn’t the clubs, the girls, the managers, or the owners. It’s the people here who can’t seem to read with an open mind, yet insist on dictating to everyone else.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 28, 2026

ym7921 said:
oh oh the angels touch police is here guys. I'm sure the 2 users who made the comments and have been members for 17 and 22 years are totally lying and not the angels touch shill trying to protect her girls that keep on ripping of clients. shouldn't the admin be doing something about the blatant shilling from users?

lmao just had a gander at some of her previous comments. man no wonder some of these places have gone downhill if she is running them. old inaccurate photos, dirty towels, poor service and the hundreds of excuses instead of taking responsibility. what an eye opener.

guys apparently photos shoots are expensive but that means its totally ok to have inaccurate photos on the website. lol what did I read. if someone doesn't understand a basic concept of why accurate photos is important in this industry they have no business running a place but I guess it totally makes sense now why its gone so downhill.

I made no comment on the original post — that was my entire point.

A well-written review drew several replies on its other aspects, which I addressed directly. Instead of engaging on substance, you chose to mock me as a manager ‘defying my girls and the club.

SIRLOKI · Mar 28, 2026

Britneyyy66 said:
Maybe ask how you cannot properly review ? I’ve seen many reviews and I’ll say reviews are very one sided and on here and y’all trust that one person leaving the review.

You cannot review all services provided in spas.It is against TERB rules..is what I was trying to say.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 28, 2026

SIRLOKI said:
You cannot review all services provided in spas.It is against TERB rules..is what I was trying to say.

Oh I see, def can’t be doing that.

ym7921 · Mar 28, 2026

Britneyyy66 said:
I made no comment on the original post — that was my entire point.

A well-written review drew several replies on its other aspects, which I addressed directly. Instead of engaging on substance, you chose to mock me as a manager ‘defying my girls and the club.

You addressed it directly by commenting how people trust one sided reviews which already implies you saying its's false. Considering the reviewer has been around for over 17 years who is really lying here?
But hey great job in addressing it!

Britneyyy66 said:
Comments are merely comments, sir neither inherently right nor wrong. The real issue isn’t the clubs, the girls, the managers, or the owners. It’s the people here who can’t seem to read with an open mind, yet insist on dictating to everyone else.

lmao see you are at it again, acting as if people here are lying. Sure we should be reading with an open mind and listening to the angels touch shill.

The fact you can't even seem to understand as a manager that some girls can give bad services is concerning and considering AT has been coming up a lot it lately it seems to be a pattern there. Maybe a result of your great leadership!

My whole point about mentioning you as a manager is to show your bias. And considering your response on previous issues at AT including the photos and dirty sheets it's pretty clear you have no idea what you are doing. The whole example was to show that you don't know how to handle issues and how you never seem to have any accountability for the people who work there and provide poor services, misleading photos, etc.

And on your last comment. This is a review board. People will post their experiences. No one is trying to dictate anything but if the same pattern keeps on coming up over and over again are people making it up or is it a real issue? People spend a decent amount on these types of services. They deserve to know the level of service they will be getting. In this case its pretty obvious something has been going really wrong at AT in the last 2 years.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 28, 2026

ym7921 said:
You addressed it directly by commenting how people trust one sided reviews which already implies you saying its's false. Considering the reviewer has been around for over 17 years who is really lying here?
But hey great job in addressing it!

lmao see you are at it again, acting as if people here are lying. Sure we should be reading with an open mind and listening to the angels touch shill.

The fact you can't even seem to understand as a manager that some girls can give bad services is concerning and considering AT has been coming up a lot it lately it seems to be a pattern there. Maybe a result of your great leadership!

My whole point about mentioning you as a manager is to show your bias. And considering your response on previous issues at AT including the photos and dirty sheets it's pretty clear you have no idea what you are doing. The whole example was to show that you don't know how to handle issues and how you never seem to have any accountability for the people who work there and provide poor services, misleading photos, etc.

And on your last comment. This is a review board. People will post their experiences. No one is trying to dictate anything but if the same pattern keeps on coming up over and over again are people making it up or is it a real issue? People spend a decent amount on these types of services. They deserve to know the level of service they will be getting. In this case its pretty obvious something has been going really wrong at AT in the last 2 years.

I appreciate the feedback on this review board, but let’s stick to the facts.

The main performance review mentioned nothing about towels, pictures, dirty sheets, or any related service issues at AT. Not a single word. If these were significant or recurring problems under my leadership, they would have been documented there for me to address directly. Their complete absence actually supports my position rather than undermining it.

As a manager, I fully understand that individual providers can sometimes deliver subpar service and that’s why we have processes for feedback, training, and accountability. However, turning isolated complaints into a “pattern” or using them to question overall leadership requires evidence, not just repetition on a review board. People post experiences here, which is fair, but multiple mentions don’t automatically prove systemic failure, especially when official reviews show no such issues.

My responses on previous topics (including photos and sheets) were based on the documented record, not bias. I’m accountable for addressing real problems when they’re properly raised through the right channels. If clients feel misled or disappointed, that’s valid feedback we take seriously — and “angels touch” or not, the goal is always better service for the money spent.

I’m open to constructive discussion on actual documented concerns. Accusing bias or incompetence without addressing the fact that the main review was silent on these points doesn’t strengthen the argument — it actually proves mine.

Dougal Short · Mar 28, 2026

Oii... I didn't mean to start a spa-bashing thread. PS was just fine... the spa was ok, receptionist was lovely and Kiki was very nice... As I mentioned in my post, it was mostly a case of my expectations not aligning with the offering. The previous few times I'd been at AS/PS was years ago and it was wild...

Dougal Short · Mar 28, 2026

Britneyyy66 said:
I’ve seen many reviews and I’ll say reviews are very one sided and on here and y’all trust that one person leaving the review.

Ladies will often comment that reviews are one-sided and of course, that's true. We're the customers, so we get to do the review... That's the nature of "reviews" whether they are of restaurants, books, AirBnBs, or "adult services". Now Kiki might come on here and figure out who I am, and comment that I was 100 pounds overweight, hadn't showered in a week, and kept farting... none of which is true, but I'd have a hard time defending that, and wouldn't try.

Anyway, as I said, I enjoyed my time with Kiki, it just wasn't what I was expecting. By posting here, and posting an honest review, the next guy may make another choice.

As an aside, there is place where I go almost weekly in Burlington. I've probably been there 30 times and other than one recent time where a BJ may have happened, all I have ever had there was a great RMT-quality massage, with a pretty girl who is naked half the time, and who administers an excellent handy for the last 20 minutes, likely with a little DATY for good measure. But the pricing is different, and I go there with that expectation. It's probably my favourite spot. Other times, I want "more" so I choose differently.

Britneyyy66 · Mar 28, 2026

Dougal Short said:
Oii... I didn't mean to start a spa-bashing thread. PS was just fine... the spa was ok, receptionist was lovely and Kiki was very nice... As I mentioned in my post, it was mostly a case of my expectations not aligning with the offering. The previous few times I'd been at AS/PS was years ago and it was wild...

Yeah, no worries — I didn’t think you were bashing the place anyway. Good to hear the receptionist and Kiki were solid. Makes sense that your expectations were based on how wild it used to be years ago. Things change I guess.

Appreciate you explaining it though. Been good chatting with you.
Have a good one!

Dougal Short · Mar 28, 2026

Britneyyy66 said:
I appreciate the feedback on this review board, but let’s stick to the facts.

The main performance review mentioned nothing about towels, pictures, dirty sheets, or any related service issues at AT. Not a single word.

LOL I have no recollection of the towels etc one way or the other, so I guess they were fine. The floor was being held together with Gorilla tape so that could use some attention, but I got the impression that renovations were ongoing. As a former business owner, I also understand that you can't always justify large expenditures, and in my case, the shoddy floor would have no bearing on a decision to return.

Kiki @ Angels Touch

Exposed Member

Well known member

Well-known member

Member

Exposed Member

Well-known member

Exposed Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Well-known member

Member

Member

Member

Exposed Member

Exposed Member

Member

Exposed Member