A Great Night For Democrats: Referendum On Trump

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Ah, I didn't know this scandal and had to look it up.
It does sound bad but it was also clear he was just running his mouth.
Certainly not as bad as Stephen Miller paraphrasing Goebbels and then using violence against minorities.

Stephen Miller committed violence against minorities?


"Paraphrasing" = he didn't actually quote him, you just want to smear him as a nazi, because you assign the label nazi to people you want to kill without consequence.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
Stephen Miller committed violence against minorities?
"Paraphrasing" = he didn't actually quote him, you just want to smear him as a nazi, because you assign the label nazi to people you want to kill without consequence.
Smear? No.
He IS a Nazi who spoke Goebbel's language and he leads policy that results in violence against minorities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Smear? No.
He IS a Nazi who spoke Goebbel's language and he leads policy that results in violence against minorities.
Stephen Miller, a jew, is a member of the long-defunct National Socialist German Worker's Party? And he spoke German (Goebbels' language)?

Or he said something that histrionic, reactionary leftists think resembles something Goebbels said, which they hyper-focused on so they can justify killing him without consequence?

Mamdani threw up a roman salute identical to Elon's at his victory party. Is he a nazi?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
Stephen Miller, a jew, is a member of the long-defunct National Socialist German Worker's Party? And he spoke German (Goebbels' language)?
Or he said something that histrionic, reactionary leftists think resembles something Goebbels said, which they hyper-focused on so they can justify killing him without consequence?
Mamdani threw up a roman salute identical to Elon's at his victory party. Is he a nazi?
Yes, Stephen Miller is Jewish and he is also Nazi not because is a member of the 1920s party, but because of his beliefs that are similar.
And yes, he plagiarized bits and pieces from Goebbels' "The storm is coming" speech and conveyed similar messaging.
Mamdani did not throw a roman salute.
But Elon definitely threw a Nazi salute, has supported Nazis even in other countries, which makes it justified to call him Nazi.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: de_generate

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Yes, Stephen Miller is Jewish and he is also Nazi not because is a member of the 1920s party, but because of his beliefs that are similar.
And yes, he plagiarized bits and pieces from Goebbels' "The storm is coming" speech and conveyed similar messaging.
Mamdani did not throw a roman salute.
But Elon definitely threw a Nazi salute, has supported Nazis even in other countries, which makes it justified to call him Nazi.

Nobody with any semblance of intelligence buys any of this. Anybody with a brain knows you're selectively applying and omitting these labels because they indicate whether someone belongs on the leftist kill list.

Any right-winger that does not realize this and allows one of you to get close enough to commit the violence you relish, is, unfortunately, an acceptable loss. They were never going to make it, because they don't realize what time it really is.

The rest of us are keenly aware, and we are so fucking ready for you morons to push it too far. You are NOT prepared for what your rhetoric is leading to, but we are.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
Nobody with any semblance of intelligence buys any of this. Anybody with a brain knows you're selectively applying and omitting these labels because they indicate whether someone belongs on the leftist kill list.
Any right-winger that does not realize this and allows one of you to get close enough to commit the violence you relish, is, unfortunately, an acceptable loss. They were never going to make it, because they don't realize what time it really is.
The rest of us are keenly aware, and we are so fucking ready for you morons to push it too far. You are NOT prepared for what your rhetoric is leading to, but we are.
Everyone knows the rhetoric and violence that the far right in power, especially in the US, are currently visiting upon people based on race, gender and sexual orientation.
Nazi salutes, Nazi speeches, unconstitutional arrests, violence on civilians without due process, illegal deportations, racial profiling, lawfare, attacks on media, militarily taking over cities, you name it.
So if you are getting ready and prepared just make sure it is to accept failure just like every other far right group that has ever existed throughout history.
 

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Everyone knows the rhetoric and violence that the far right in power, especially in the US, are currently visiting upon people based on race, gender and sexual orientation.
Nazi salutes, Nazi speeches, unconstitutional arrests, violence on civilians without due process, illegal deportations, racial profiling, lawfare, attacks on media, militarily taking over cities, you name it.
So if you are getting ready and prepared just make sure it is to accept failure just like every other far right group that has ever existed throughout history.
99.9% of all humans who ever lived would be considered "far right" by your standards, including your ancestors, and those of the races you think your imaginary nazis threaten.

it is by the grace of those people's survival, success, and prosperity that either of us are alive today and can enjoy the fruits of western civilization.

the failure of their system is the success of chaos. you bragging about being an agent of this chaos is not surprising, nor is it the flex you think it is. We already know leftism is the ideology of corruption and destruction.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
99.9% of all humans who ever lived would be considered "far right" by your standards....
No. I call far right individuals as far right individuals.
Western civilization was preserved by defeating the Nazis and other far right malcontents, not by allowing them to succeed.
At all times it is the left that has got nations to progress, flourish and ensure freedoms and civil rights. (in democracies).
The right has always stood in the way of progress and has always been at war with people.
Which is why they always lose, despite being able to capitalize on tough economic times to rear their ugly heads every now and then, like they've been able to do in the US today.
 
Last edited:

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
No. I call far right individuals as far right individuals.
Western civilization was preserved by defeating the Nazis and other far right malcontents, not by allowing them to succeed.
At all times it is the left that has got nations to progress, flourish and ensure freedoms and civil rights. (in democracies).
The right has always stood in the way of progress and has always been at war with people.
Which is why they always lose, despite being able to capitalize on tough economic times to rear their ugly heads every now and then, like they've been able to do in the US today.

Western civilization was preserved by allying with an Eastern communist dictator who threw millions of expendable countrymen into the Nazi war machine, and then letting those Eastern communist ideas infiltrate Western power centres for the next century?


The only thing you progress towards is entropy. It will be stopped.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
Western civilization was preserved by allying with an Eastern communist dictator who threw millions of expendable countrymen into the Nazi war machine, and then letting those Eastern communist ideas infiltrate Western power centres for the next century?
The only thing you progress towards is entropy. It will be stopped.
Well we are fortunate that while we did ally with a communist dictator during war, we didn't really adopt a communist system of government, because we were democracies.
This McCarthyist nonsense that anything that is not right-wing demagoguery is "CoMmUnIsM" is an oft-tried and failed tactic that you’d be better served abandoning altogether.
And yes, the current right wing demagoguery is a phase and it will be stopped.
If you don't believe me, the recent elections in the US this week with the Dems sweeping everything, with even Jewish voters in NYC voting for Mamdani, or Pierre blowing a 20 point lead to lose his own riding earlier in the year, should be signs that your jig is up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Well we are fortunate that while we did ally with a communist dictator during war, we didn't really adopt a communist system of government, because we were democracies.
This McCarthyist nonsense that anything that is not right-wing demagoguery is "CoMmUnIsM" is an oft-tried and failed tactic that you’d be better served abandoning altogether.
And yes, the current right wing demagoguery is a phase and it will be stopped.
If you don't believe me, the recent elections in the US this week with the Dems sweeping everything, with even Jewish voters in NYC voting for Mamdani, or Pierre blowing a 20 point lead to lose his own riding earlier in the year, should be signs that your jig is up.
Dems won strongholds that went for Kamala. Republicans ran a black woman in Virginia, not exactly an ubermensch candidate, genius.

Jews almost ALWAYS vote left, and literally within a day of winning Zohran was meeting with Jews and denouncing the most obvious swastika graffiti false flag in recent memory (there are so many).

Trump had a large effect on the Canadian election (the exact effect he wanted. Where are your elbows right now?), and the Carleton election was literal election interference sabotage with the number of candidates and the redistricting done on it.

But please, get comfortable.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
Dems won strongholds that went for Kamala. Republicans ran a black woman in Virginia, not exactly an ubermensch candidate, genius.

Jews almost ALWAYS vote left, and literally within a day of winning Zohran was meeting with Jews and denouncing the most obvious swastika graffiti false flag in recent memory (there are so many).

Trump had a large effect on the Canadian election (the exact effect he wanted. Where are your elbows right now?), and the Carleton election was literal election interference sabotage with the number of candidates and the redistricting done on it.

But please, get comfortable.
Today's far right is very different from the far right that we are normally used to. Today's far right consist of minorities, LGBTQ people etc.,
This however does not take away from the fact that they are still malcontents. So the Republicans running a black woman in Virginia doesn't mean much.
No, Jews don't always vote left. Trump got a lot of Jewish votes in the election.
The Jewish voters voting Mamdani despite his stance on Israel, and Canadians choosing Carney over Pierre, is people pushing back on far right extremism.
That is within a year of Trump coming to power, so don't count on much for 2028.
They will lose especially with Trump stepping down and others not being able to take his spot or achieve his level of cult status.
PS: Even without the 100+ candidates in Carleton Pierre would have lost. I literally counted those votes, and he would've still fallen short.
 

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
Today's far right is very different from the far right that we are normally used to. Today's far right consist of minorities, LGBTQ people etc.,
This however does not take away from the fact that they are still malcontents. So the Republicans running a black woman in Virginia doesn't mean much.
No, Jews don't always vote left. Trump got a lot of Jewish votes in the election.
The Jewish voters voting Mamdani despite his stance on Israel, and Canadians choosing Carney over Pierre, is people pushing back on far right extremism.
That is within a year of Trump coming to power, so don't count on much for 2028.
They will lose especially with Trump stepping down and others not being able to take his spot or achieve his level of cult status.
PS: Even without the 100+ candidates in Carleton Pierre would have lost. I literally counted those votes, and he would've still fallen short.
Lmao yeah okay Winsome-Sears was far right

why is the far right attracting minorities and LGBTQ? are they just stupid?

Trump got a lot of Jewish votes, but that wasn't even most of them. The entire USA would be blue if only Jews voted. This is the problem with leftists. You don't understand averages or statistics. You don't even care to.

Pierre and the Conservatives suffered because Pierre focused on the carbon tax rather than immigration for the election. He was too lame to focus on the actual key issue in Canada, and that's what failed to mobilize votes for him and his party.

You will see this issue come to a much more dramatic head in Canada because of this failure of his.

Also, never forget that Carney debased himself repeatedly in front of Trump, despite running on the opposite, and got NOTHING for it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
why is the far right attracting minorities and LGBTQ? are they just stupid?
Yes, they are stupid.
But malicious and stupid people can be of any skin colour or sexual orientation or gender identity.
Trump got a lot of Jewish votes, but that wasn't even most of them. The entire USA would be blue if only Jews voted. This is the problem with leftists. You don't understand averages or statistics. You don't even care to.
He still got 10% more than he did in 2020.
He doesn't have to have a majority of their votes to win as he didn't really win by a landslide as it is commonly bandied about on the right.
A couple of % points is all it takes.
Pierre and the Conservatives suffered because Pierre focused on the carbon tax rather than immigration for the election. He was too lame to focus on the actual key issue in Canada, and that's what failed to mobilize votes for him and his party.
Pierre lost because he was a glorified sloganeer and nothing much else.
People favoured him because of Trudeau performing poorly in the last 2 years, so even liberals like me were reluctantly considering voting for Pierre.
But once Trudeau stepped down, and Carney announced the carbon tax would be repealed, Pierre had nothing to sloganeer about.
Even Pierre knows that while advocating for reduced immigration, that Canada thrives on immigration.
Which is why even if he comes to power, which he won't, he isn't going to make your dreams of zero immigration come true.
You will see this issue come to a much more dramatic head in Canada because of this failure of his.
No it won't.
We aren't the US.
Conservatives do not have the numerical superiority.
I said this to another poster, Canada welcomes about 350-400K permanent residents per year, who will become citizens, predominantly in the GTA and Vancouver in 3 years.
Even with reduced immigration targets the numbers are close.
Additionally you have, already existing temporary residents becoming PRs and then becoming citizens in half the time (as their temporary residency counts towards time spent in Canada).
Not all of them will vote Liberal, but with all the far right wing racism they are facing, most will be compelled to vote for the Liberals, atleast reluctantly.
They are all especially concentrated in the GTA, and GTA is a Liberal stronghold.
So the further right the CPC goes, the further right the US goes, the better the chances for the Liberals.
Any liberal government will further invite more immigration, even if they reduce targets.
So you do the math.
TLDR: Welcome to your 4th liberal term and get ready for the 5th. lmfao.
Also, never forget that Carney debased himself repeatedly in front of Trump, despite running on the opposite, and got NOTHING for it.
Carney didn't debase himself.
He stood his ground, declared an end to economic integration with the US, and is now pursuing expansion of bilateral trade with other nations.
Like a strong leader would do.
 

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
He still got 10% more than he did in 2020.
He doesn't have to have a majority of their votes to win as he didn't really win by a landslide as it is commonly bandied about on the right.
A couple of % points is all it takes.
I never said he needed a majority. I said Jews always vote mostly left.

I am objectively correct, and you are arguing against something I never said.

This is typical leftist behaviour. Pointless, too.

No it won't.
We aren't the US.
Conservatives do not have the numerical superiority.
I said this to another poster, Canada welcomes about 350-400K permanent residents per year, who will become citizens, predominantly in the GTA and Vancouver in 3 years.
Even with reduced immigration targets the numbers are close.
Additionally you have, already existing temporary residents becoming PRs and then becoming citizens in half the time (as their temporary residency counts towards time spent in Canada).
Not all of them will vote Liberal, but with all the far right wing racism they are facing, most will be compelled to vote for the Liberals, atleast reluctantly.
They are all especially concentrated in the GTA, and GTA is a Liberal stronghold.
So the further right the CPC goes, the further right the US goes, the better the chances for the Liberals.
Any liberal government will further invite more immigration, even if they reduce targets.
So you do the math.
TLDR: Welcome to your 4th liberal term and get ready for the 5th. lmfao.
this sounds like the great replacement theory to me!

what are you, a nazi?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
It is not replacement. That is just far right fear mongering.
It is math. Elections are based on simple math called "counting votes" lmao.
lmfao buddy

it's math... about replacement migration's effect on elections.

Yeah, I agree, that at this pace the Canadian population that made this place a country people wanted to live in, will be marginalized out of power due to immigration.

The difference is I'm smart enough to realize: this is a bad thing and it needs to stop.

Are you a covetous minority or a suicidal stock boomer?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
8,197
8,803
113
I never said he needed a majority. I said Jews always vote mostly left.

I am objectively correct, and you are arguing against something I never said.

This is typical leftist behaviour. Pointless, too.
I originally said, that Trump got a lot of Jewish votes. This is objectively true.
You told me Jewish voters ALWAYS vote left.
If Trump got 10% more Jewish votes in 2024 than he did in 2020, then that disproves your statement that Jewish voters ALWAYS vote left.
It is you that got caught in your own words.
lmfao buddy
it's math... about replacement migration's effect on elections.
Yeah, I agree, that at this pace the Canadian population that made this place a country people wanted to live in, will be marginalized out of power due to immigration.
The difference is I'm smart enough to realize: this is a bad thing and it needs to stop.
No it is not the same.
The great replacement is a far right conspiracy theory that there is a conscious effort by the ones in power to replace the WHITE population of Canada - not the natural born black, brown, asian or any other ethnicity, but solely the WHITE population of Canada, with non-white immigrants.
This is not the same as bringing in young, immigrants from non-white regions of the world to ensure demographic stability, productivity and future growth.
Canada is a country of immigrants and bringing in qualified people recognizing that we are in demographic decline is the right move.
 
Last edited:

de_generate

Member
Jan 29, 2016
51
59
18
I originally said, that Trump got a lot of Jewish votes. This is objectively true.
You told me Jewish voters ALWAYS vote left.
If Trump got 10% more Jewish votes in 2024 than he did in 2020, then that disproves your statement that Jewish voters ALWAYS vote left.
It is you that got caught in your own words.

No it is not the same.
The great replacement is a far right conspiracy theory that there is a conscious effort by the ones in power to replace the WHITE population fo Canada - not the natural born black, brown, asian or any other ethnicity, but solely the WHITE population of Canada, with non-white immigrants.
This is not the same as bringing in young, immigrants from non-white regions of the world to ensure demographic stability, productivity and future growth.
Canada is a country of immigrants and bringing in qualified people recognizing that we are in demographic decline is the right move.

I know I laughed at a lot of the other posts you made, but I want you to know this is the one that made me laugh the hardest.

The most typical leftists obfuscation of reality on display right here.

I said "almost always left" which means the percentage is NEVER over 50% for the right. Ever. If only Jews voted in any American election, likely ever, the leftist would win. This is a statistical fact based on exit polling. Yes, sometimes they go more right than other times, but NEVER more than 50%.

As for the replacement theory, you're coping with "it's not actually deliberate" (it is), and that it has merit (it doesn't). The purpose of a system is what it's done/achieved. As immigration marches on, the power of my pre-confederation roots in this country will continue to decline, and so will quality of living, any reprieve in the latter being granted by technological advances discovered by those of White European, and far East Asian genetic stock, which will diminish in effectiveness as these populations decline in the countries they established.


so yeah, the Chaos you serve is likely to come to pass, lest men like me do something.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts