A new financial impetus for peace in Ukraine

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,304
2,661
113
Ghawar
Friedrich Merz
Sep 25 2025

The writer is chancellor of Germany

Vladimir Putin continues his brutal war of conquest against Ukraine with unrelenting ferocity. Every residential block destroyed in Odesa, every night-time strike on a hospital in Kharkiv or on a government building in Kyiv disproves the myth that Russia is willing to make peace. Europe must draw the necessary conclusions from this, ideally together with its partners on both sides of the Atlantic. We must systematically and massively raise the costs of Russia’s aggression.

We do this not to prolong the war, but to end it. Moscow will only come to the table to discuss a ceasefire when it realises that Ukraine has greater staying power. We have that staying power. Europe is more tested now than perhaps at any time in our lifetimes. Germany must — and will — assume a particular share of responsibility.

We need a new impetus to change Russia’s calculations. Now is the moment to apply an effective lever that will disrupt the Russian president’s cynical game of buying time and bring him to the negotiating table. That requires the courage and confidence to set our own agenda, rather than merely react to his.

In doing so we would give the brave people of Ukraine fresh hope. We would also send precisely the right message to Washington: the path to a just and lasting peace must be walked together.

We will support Ukraine in its defence for as long as it takes. That is the decision Europeans have made. The time has now come to back that political promise with an instrument that sends an unmistakable signal of resilience to Moscow. In recent years, we have often played it by ear. Now I am advocating the mobilisation of financial resources on a scale that will secure Ukraine’s military resilience for several years.

Germany has been, and remains, cautious on the issue of confiscating the Russian central bank’s assets that are frozen in Europe, and with good reason. There are not only questions of international law to consider, but also fundamental issues concerning the euro’s role as a global reserve currency. But this must not hold us back: we must consider how, by circumventing these
problems, we can make these funds available for the defence of Ukraine.

In my view a viable solution should now be developed whereby — without intervening in property rights — we can make available to Ukraine an interest-free loan of almost €140 billion in total. That loan would only be repaid once Russia has compensated Ukraine for the damage it has caused during this war. Until then, the Russian assets will remain frozen, as decided by the European Council.

Such extensive assistance will require budgetary guarantees from member states. Those bilateral guarantees should, as soon as the next Multiannual Financial Framework is in place in 2028, be replaced by collateralisation under the EU’s long-term budget.

The funds thus mobilised would secure Ukraine’s defence capabilities for several years. I will discuss this proposal with the European heads of state and government at our meeting in Copenhagen next Wednesday. I propose that, at the European Council at the end of October, we give the mandate to prepare this instrument in a legally secure manner.

That decision should, ideally, be unanimous — failing that, it should be adopted by the large majority of member states who are firmly committed to Ukraine. We should also invite partners around the world that have frozen Russian assets to join the instrument. To this end, we will co-ordinate closely with our partners in the G7.

For Germany, it will be important that these additional funds are solely used to finance Ukraine’s military equipment, not for general budgetary purposes. Payments should be disbursed in tranches. Member states and Ukraine would jointly determine which materiel is procured. In my view, such a comprehensive programme must also help to strengthen and expand
the European defence industry. That would serve both our collective security and European sovereignty.

In recent days we have been reminded of how comprehensively and systematically peace and freedom in Europe are under threat. As Europeans we hold powerful means to resist that threat. The time has come to use them, so that we may defend our secure, free and united Europe.

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,304
2,661
113
Ghawar
We do this not to prolong the war, but to end it. Moscow will only come to the table to discuss a ceasefire when it realises that Ukraine has greater staying power.

It is understandable those NATO-Euro stooges not wanting to dispatch their sissy
soldiers into Ukraine to kick out invading Russians. It is more amusing they still
want to end the war on the cheap.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,304
2,661
113
Ghawar
Top EU diplomat warns Trump that Europe can’t shoulder Ukraine war burden alone

Felicia Schwartz and Nicholas Vinocur
09/26/2025

UNITED NATIONS — Europe alone is not responsible for helping Ukraine bring an end to its war with Russia, EU top diplomat Kaja Kallas warned Thursday.

That is particularly true when considering President Donald Trump’s pledge to halt the fighting, she said in an interview on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly.

“He was the one who promised to stop the killing,” Kallas said. “So it can’t be on us.”

Her comments come as Ukraine and its allies try to divine the meaning of Trump’s sudden about-face on the war between Kyiv and Moscow.

In a Truth Social post earlier this week, Trump wrote that he believed Ukraine “is in a position to fight and WIN all of Ukraine back in its original form.” He added that this would come with the support of the European Union and NATO, which “can do what they want” with American weapons.

While many European officials welcomed the more supportive shift in tone toward
Ukraine, some cautioned that Trump might be suggesting that he intends to pull back American involvement and absolve Washington of responsibility.

There is no NATO without the U.S., said Kallas, the high representative for foreign affairs of the European Commission.

“America is the greatest ally in NATO. So if you talk about what NATO should do, that also means what America should do,” she said.

Trump has recently piled pressure on NATO countries to completely stop importing Russian oil and gas, and he has made this cutoff a condition for Washington moving forward with its own tariffs or sanctions against Moscow.

“Trump has been right,” Kallas said. “We have decreased our oil and gas purchases by 80 percent, which means that if everybody did what we do, there could be a bigger effect. We have done 19 packages of sanctions. If allies would mirror them, the war would be over sooner.”

While underscoring that Europe had already reduced its use of Russian energy, Kallas argued that Washington had a role to play in convincing Hungary and Slovakia — the two biggest importers of Russian energy in the bloc — to sever their dependence. She stressed that the U.S. has “leverage” over those countries, pointing to a phone call between Trump and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán as a positive step.

While senior members of Trump’s team, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy for peace missions Steve Witkoff, have argued that sanctioning Russia could threaten its ability to negotiate, Moscow hasn’t approached those talks in “good faith,” Kallas said.

“I understand what the Americans are saying — that they can’t put pressure on Russia because that would close the communication channels that they have with Russia, and they are the only ones mediating this,” she said.

But the positive gestures from the U.S. have not yielded results, she stressed.

“You are coming in good faith, you are offering all this so that [Russia] would come to the table, but they actually just escalate. … This goodwill is abused by Putin,” she said. “Now the question is, what do you do with this?”

As leaders converged in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, Europe was on edge following a slew of airspace violations by Russian drones and military planes. Denmark remains on high alert after a series of unattributed drone sightings over major airports.

Adding to the tension, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said during a G20 foreign ministers meeting at the U.N. headquarters Thursday that the EU and NATO had “basically declared war” on Moscow by supporting Ukraine, according to live translation of remarks delivered in Russian.

“Putin is testing us, seeing how far he can go. He wants to see our reaction,” Kallas said about the airspace violations. While NATO leaders wish to respond forcefully to deter future Russian incursions, Moscow is also trying to fuel anxiety in member countries.

“If your response is too strong, that also has an effect on our societies,” she said, adding that citizens are anxious about war spilling over into their territories. “So that’s the balancing act that the leaders have to do, not fueling the fear inside our society.”

Kallas also argued in favor of mobilizing frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine ahead of discussions among G7 finance ministers planned for Oct. 1.

“If the understanding is that nobody around the table can possibly imagine that reconstruction of Ukraine comes from our taxpayers’ pockets, then we need to have solutions. Russia should pay for the damages they have caused,” she said.

 

rgkv

old timer
Nov 14, 2005
4,137
1,685
113
To be honest.. the whole world should be against Russia for causing war and the US for screwing up the rest of the world
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,304
2,661
113
Ghawar
To be honest.. the whole world should be against Russia for causing war and the US for screwing up the rest of the world
The U.S. under Trump remains the leader of the west in fighting
Russia for causing war.

The parts of the world other than the collective west and the handful
of western-friendly counries don't give a rat's ass about lending support
to the proxy war against Russia.
 

rgkv

old timer
Nov 14, 2005
4,137
1,685
113
The U.S. under Trump remains the leader of the west in fighting
Russia for causing war.

The parts of the world other than the collective west and the handful
of western-friendly counries don't give a rat's ass about lending support
to the proxy war against Russia.
under Trump, the us is now making money off the war, selling all the bullets and bomb you need.
as I said the whole world SHOULD be against Russia for the war.
Its just how I feel about all of this BS.. no offence to you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Toronto Escorts