American Cities that are dying (7 American Cities in Decline)

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
24/7 obtained its population data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Division. Housing vacancy came from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey. This is a list of the seven American cities that have lost the most people in the past decade:

1. New Orleans

Population: 354,850
Population Change 2000-2009: -128,813
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -26.63%
Home Vacancy: 21.5%

New Orleans is unique in that its presence on this list is not due to industrial decline, but from natural disaster. Hurricane Katrina flooded 80% of the city, caused by some estimates more than $80 billion in damage, and displaced tens of thousands of residents. The period of widespread homelessness, severe crime, and slow recovery has left the city as a shadow of its former self. While people are trickling back into the city, many will likely never return, and the city has lost more than a quarter of its population in just 10 years.

2. Flint, Mich.

Population: 111,475
Population Change 2000-2009: -13,266
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -10.63%
Home Vacancy: 18%

While most of the cities on this list are here as the result of a general decline in industry, Flint's woes have come almost entirely from one sector -- the auto industry. Flint became a boomtown at the turn of the century as it became a divisional headquarters to the major American auto manufacturers, including Chevrolet, Buick, and General Motors. Between 1910 and 1930, the population had more than quadrupled due to the success of the American car business. Since the American auto industry began its decline in the 1980s, Flint has consistently lost at least 10% of its population each decade. Massive layoffs and plant closings have devastated the city, and unemployment rates remain well into the double digits.

[How to Avoid Getting Ripped Off For Auto Repairs]

3. Cleveland

Population: 431,369
Population Change 2000-2009: -45,205
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -9.49%
Home Vacancy: 17.5%

Cleveland, the largest city on our list, was once a thriving manufacturing center, as well as an important point of trade because of its connection to several key routes, particularly Lake Erie. The city was once home to a sizable auto industry. Most of the largest companies that were once based in Cleveland no longer exist. These include Peerless, People's and Winton. Cleveland also served as headquarters for John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Company, as well as a key import location for coal and iron shipped from the South and Midwest. The decline of industrial American has hit the city particularly hard, and poverty, a default on municipal debt in the '70s, and pollution have earned the city the nickname "the mistake on the lake." In 1948, the city had over 910,000 people; it now has less than half of that.

4. Buffalo, N.Y.

Population: 270,240
Population Change 2000-2009: -21,970
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -7.52%
Home Vacancy: 17.2%

Another victim of the Erie Canal boom and bust, Buffalo was the 13th largest city in the country just before WW II. It is now the 70th. Like Rochester, the city was once a premier mill town due to its location to the canal. Massive electricity generation from Niagara Falls improved Buffalo's industrial capacity, and the city referred to itself as the "City of Lights" for a time because of its power production. The collapse of the canal and improvements in the energy industry that made Niagara Falls less important led to the mass migration from the city which continues to this day. In the 1970s alone, Buffalo lost more than 100,000 residents, roughly a third of its current population.

[Where the Richest Americans Live]

5. Dayton, Ohio

Population: 153,843
Population Change 2000-2009: -11,961
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -7.21%
Home Vacancy: 18.9%

For its size, Dayton, Ohio, was once one of the most productive and creative cities in the U.S. It produced more patents per capita at the turn of the century than any other. The city was home to several former great Fortune 500 companies, including National Cash Register, Mead Paper and Phillips Manufacturing. Through the first half of the 20th century, Dayton had one of the healthiest manufacturing industries. It had more GM autoworkers than any city outside of Michigan during World War II. In the past 50 years, Mead has merged with West Virginia Paper and moved to Richmond, and GM has closed one plant after another in the city.

6. Pittsburgh

Population: 311,647
Population Change 2000-2009: -22,056
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -6.61%
Home Vacancy: 14.1%

Known as the "Steel City," Pittsburgh was once the forge for the American industrial engine from the late 1800s through the late 1970s. At its peak, the city was home to more than 1,000 factories, including the mills owned by Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel, which by itself employed over 340,000 workers during World War II. As the American steel industry collapsed in the 1980s, Pittsburgh suffered severe unemployment problems. In the past few decades, the city changed to a technology-based economy, but the population is still on the decline. Since 1950, Pittsburgh's population has declined by more than 50%.

[America's Happiest Companies]

7. Rochester, N.Y.

Population: 207,294
Population Change 2000-2009: -12,180
Population Percent Change 2000-2009: -5.55%
Home Vacancy: 15.3%

Rochester was once a booming trade center largely due to its location at the midpoint between Albany and Buffalo on the Erie Canal. At its peak, the city was the major flour processor in the country, and was home to several key corporations including Xerox and Eastman Kodak. Rochester declined as the usefulness of the canal went out with the advent of railroads and its flagship companies began to lose their relevancy in the larger global economy. Rochester has yet to produce an important replacement industry to drive up the population, and even the success in the 1990's of Xerox has faded. Between 1950 and 2000, Rochester lost 34% of its population.


Link to whole article:

http://finance.yahoo.com/family-home/article/111709/us-cities-running-out-of-people
 

alwayslooking

Member
Feb 12, 2003
720
0
16
52
Like the article says New Orleans is a whole different ball game. How Detroit did not make this list is surprising especially when you hear mostly good things about how Pittsburgh has turned things around. I went to Pittsburgh and Cleveland a couple of years ago and I can tell you that Pittsburgh is a lot nicer than Detroit or Cleveland
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,550
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Something deadly about those great lakes.... at least on the south end....

OTB
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
I've been to Pittsburgh as well and thought Dowtown was pretty good (though it fucking DIES at dusk).

Rochester is a bit of hole and sadly Buffalo is not pretty either.

Other than NO, all of them have the same thing in common - former manufacturing centres. Obviously, there is the loss of jobs associated with the death of the American Industrial Heartland (having been shipped to China).

It would be an interesting study to see if one looked at the suburbs around those cities if the suburbs are also in a state of decay. Is this an urban (dying) vs. a suburb (living) sort of thing, or is the entire area in a death spiral? From what I see around Buffalo - the suburbs are better off than Buffalo proper. Ditto Detroit. While in Detroit there are vast abandonned neighbourhoods and buildings - the suburbs of Detroit are doing much better.
 

stinkynuts

Super
Jan 4, 2005
8,427
2,772
113
Many of those cities mentioned are predominantly black. I don't think this necessarily means that they are the cause, it could be that they are the ones who remain in decaying cities because of little choice. However, it's hard to ignore the link...
 

Surfbum84

New member
Feb 6, 2008
344
0
0
Many of those cities mentioned are predominantly black. I don't think this necessarily means that they are the cause, it could be that they are the ones who remain in decaying cities because of little choice. However, it's hard to ignore the link...

Are you serious?
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
Many of those cities mentioned are predominantly black. I don't think this necessarily means that they are the cause, it could be that they are the ones who remain in decaying cities because of little choice. However, it's hard to ignore the link...
It's called "White Flight" - when white people leave a city for many reasons (usually for the burbs) or white communities.

That said, I really don't know how "black" those cities are. I would think that NO would be the most black (maybe I'm wrong, dunno).

I find the topic of City Demographics to be very interesting. What makes some inner cities thrive and be a sought after place to live (such as our very own Toronto, or NYC, or San Francisco, or Chicago (to cite a few American cities)) vs. others that wither and die (like the above), and others attempt a comeback (was reading about Portland Oregon for example).

Do you ever watch that show on HGTV called "House Hunters" It's set all over the USA and for the most part it is so completely foreign to me (living in the inner city of Toronto) it's like a foreign universe. It seems like every Biff and Muffy out there in America wants to live in a McMansion in the burbs with 6,000 ft2, 6 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms, and 4.2 acres. All you hear is, "that's nice", "it's not very big", "that's nice and big", "I love how big the master bedroom is" "It doesn't have granite counters". I keep thinking that Biff and Muffy would have a stroke if they saw my 1200 ft2 house with a 20 ft. wide lot and mutual driveway and what it costs in Toronto. "Ewww, I would never pay that for that little house"
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
how many of them have a democrat leadership for decades besides Buffalo.

I will bet that decline and democrat goes hand in hand with these cities.
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
how many of them have a democrat leadership for decades besides Buffalo.

I will bet that decline and democrat goes hand in hand with these cities.
Some people love to pull these kinds of political comments into every thread and it's pretty pathetic. I dare say if you study hard enough at data you'd be able to find a link to the weather, but it wouldn't really be relevant.
 

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
29,118
1,823
113
One of the main reasons why these cities are in decline is that manufacturing is moving to China. People with education, position and opportunity move to places with better conditions. There are less black people with the opportunities that whites have.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,949
5,755
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Let this be a lesson to you!

The USA is reaping the bitter harvest of GLOBALISM and millions of jobs offshored. Where American workers were abandoned for the conservative Corporate GREED of the top 1%....namely the Haves & the Have Mores in their New World Order 'wealth redistribution', by attacking the now vanishing middle class.

All those great paying jobs promised by Corporatist apologists that were going to replace those good jobs sent to their commie pals in RED China NEVER materialized! It was all a big lie.

This IS what happened to the USA, a result of myopic conservative Corporatist economic policies!
Don't let Harpo and his conservative stooges do the same to you!
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
how many of them have a democrat leadership for decades besides Buffalo.

I will bet that decline and democrat goes hand in hand with these cities.
So does NYC, San Francisco, and Chicago - and I've been to all of the aforementioned and they are all remarkable thriving cities.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
Did someone say Flint, Michigan? Mr. Moore is going to make a documentary about this!
He already did - it's called, "Roger and Me" and it was the doc that put him on the map and it was brilliant, if not a little bogus.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
The USA is reaping the bitter harvest of GLOBALISM and millions of jobs offshored. Where American workers were abandoned for the conservative Corporate GREED of the top 1%....namely the Haves & the Have Mores in their New World Order 'wealth redistribution', by attacking the now vanishing middle class.

All those great paying jobs promised by Corporatist apologists that were going to replace those good jobs sent to their commie pals in RED China NEVER materialized! It was all a big lie.

This IS what happened to the USA, a result of myopic conservative Corporatist economic policies!
Don't let Harpo and his conservative stooges do the same to you!
All very true.

Except for one thing - the Union Membership are the worst offenders for buying and demanding cheap Made in China shit (i.e. they are the ones shopping at Walmart, figuring that they will be so smart with their hard earned cash, but it won't affect their jobs).

As for Harpo, he's so Western biased it isn't funny. His take on Canada is that if isn't dug out of the ground in Alberta or Saskatchewan - it isn't worth defending.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
So does NYC, San Francisco, and Chicago - and I've been to all of the aforementioned and they are all remarkable thriving cities.

Of NYC, Chigicao and San Fran which is a RUST BELT CITY??

How about comparing apples to apples?
 

Tangwhich

New member
Jan 26, 2004
2,261
0
0
Of NYC, Chigicao and San Fran which is a RUST BELT CITY??

How about comparing apples to apples?
So for the shit cities, the political leaders are relevant, but for the good ones it's not?
Mugabe ruined a great country.. bad leadership is bad leadership..
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,072
3,991
113
Of NYC, Chigicao and San Fran which is a RUST BELT CITY??

How about comparing apples to apples?
The point is is that they are cities that are largely "Democrat" if you want to apply your political metaphor that you cited. There are many other American cities that are solidly Democrat and they too are doing just fine. I would also wager that there are many other American cities that are solid Republican centres and they are struggling as well.

It wouldn't matter if the above cities were Democrat centres or Republican centres - they would be in the same place. Obviously, the one commonality to all of them is manufacturing (other than NO) and Woody is correct - the capitalists have moved their production to China where it's cheap and fuck you very much. Are the unions blameless in all of this? No, they share in the blame, but ultimately some big shot somewhere thought, "hmm, we can manufacture in China for 2 bucks a day, or Buffalo for 20 bucks an hour. Hmmm, which one do I pick?"
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
So for the shit cities, the political leaders are relevant, but for the good ones it's not?
Mugabe ruined a great country.. bad leadership is bad leadership..

Not at all

I have lived in the Buffalo area all my life and for as long as I can remember the local politicians have strived to promote the best welfare in the nation.

Now granted I am only 52 and have lived through the decline and fall of Buffalo as a power when it comes to employment.
 
He already did - it's called, "Roger and Me" and it was the doc that put him on the map and it was brilliant, if not a little bogus.
Oh yes, "Who Framed Roger Rabbit part two w/ Michael Moore: Roger and Me" LOL. He did a big gamble mortgaging his home to make the movie, it worked and good for him. Shame on GM for destroying Flint, Michigan...now I am off to buy a Mustang.
 
Toronto Escorts