Anderson has been banned.
- Thread starter TQM
- Start date
But others might want to know what happen.
I have found this board is nice to visit. I can't say what other boards I have been on before but on 2 of them that is about the Falls SP one baned me after I was not saying that staying with agency ladies instead of Indy's was best and on another I was threaten, called names, even had the name of the city I live in posted because I was standing up for a 20 year old former escort. The company was spreading a false rumor that she was stealing money from clients that she met by working for them. The escort company was warning the guys to stay away from her. It turn out to be untrue like a month later. Poor girl, the company took her back for like a month but where she is now IDK. In the month the fight was on going between me and the lady working for the company and her friends, I received 2 PM from former escorts of that company saying something like that happen to them.
I do know nothing like that would ever happen here on Terb.
I have found this board is nice to visit. I can't say what other boards I have been on before but on 2 of them that is about the Falls SP one baned me after I was not saying that staying with agency ladies instead of Indy's was best and on another I was threaten, called names, even had the name of the city I live in posted because I was standing up for a 20 year old former escort. The company was spreading a false rumor that she was stealing money from clients that she met by working for them. The escort company was warning the guys to stay away from her. It turn out to be untrue like a month later. Poor girl, the company took her back for like a month but where she is now IDK. In the month the fight was on going between me and the lady working for the company and her friends, I received 2 PM from former escorts of that company saying something like that happen to them.
I do know nothing like that would ever happen here on Terb.
How about a TERB justice system?
One moderator could be the prosecutor.
The accused poster could be defended by another poster or another moderator.
Another moderator would serve as the judge.
The jury would be a panel of 12 TERBites.
And there will be plea bargains and parole for lesser ban times, as well as a TERB death penalty.
One moderator could be the prosecutor.
The accused poster could be defended by another poster or another moderator.
Another moderator would serve as the judge.
The jury would be a panel of 12 TERBites.
And there will be plea bargains and parole for lesser ban times, as well as a TERB death penalty.
Ban me Sheik.
1. Yes, I've questioned a moderator's decision in a public manner twice. Consider this the third time. (such a crime!)
2. This is a privately owned site - thanks for pointing out something I pointed out.
3. You don't give a shit what I think. That makes us on equal terms, doesn't it?
4. I'm questioning you now in a public fashion. Suspend me.
5. Can't check my pm's. Didn't know that. I'll give you my password, if it suits you.
6. No - I didn't have all the facts. But then again, you didn't give any of us access to them. Can't blame me for that. And I will continue to judge, based on the facts available. All I can do is be upfront with you on this, so ban me.
1. Yes, I've questioned a moderator's decision in a public manner twice. Consider this the third time. (such a crime!)
2. This is a privately owned site - thanks for pointing out something I pointed out.
3. You don't give a shit what I think. That makes us on equal terms, doesn't it?
4. I'm questioning you now in a public fashion. Suspend me.
5. Can't check my pm's. Didn't know that. I'll give you my password, if it suits you.
6. No - I didn't have all the facts. But then again, you didn't give any of us access to them. Can't blame me for that. And I will continue to judge, based on the facts available. All I can do is be upfront with you on this, so ban me.
Wow, I think somebody needs a date. Take it easy, I gotten some pretty mean PM on other sites, we have to just take Sheiks word that he was sending threatening PM, if so its good he is baned.
Its no fun to be threaten, even if its not in person.
Its no fun to be threaten, even if its not in person.
He must like TQM as the only thing deleting this thread would do would be to keep TQM from hanging himself. Personally, I find it annoying when a thread starter deletes a thread I have posted in (such posters will remain nameless).lookingforitallthetime said:
Don't kid yourself, danmand loves it. Pre-agitated shit is a shit disturber's wet dream.someone said:
Yes, I find that annoying too. It's especially annoying when the thread starter makes references to the thread he deleted in another thread.someone said:
points:
1. I've said numerous times here I'm opposed to thread deletion. It would be particularly slimy of me to delete a thread then, wouldn't it? I'm opposed to it for moral reasons.
2. When making judgments, no one has all the facts. You base your judgments on the evidence before you. Every one of you makes judgments without "all" the facts. You judge this political type or that based on your armchair observations.
3. I didn't have all the facts - but some of you (hello Asterix!) seem to deliberately forget the fact that I clearly stated I may not have all the facts, but out of the facts available, the decision seemed stupid.
4. Again, Anderson - who has an email address to email me - told me of his banning and thought it was for the thread on the lounge. I first checked out that thread in its entirety, checked other posts he had made and then acted. I did my due dilligence.
5. I would/will do the same for you under similar circumstances. Sue me. For Anderson's sake, I'm disheartened to hear there are more facts. I thought he was a racist moron, but saw nothing to ban.
6. I don't believe in saying one thing in this forum and another in private messages. Maybe- just maybe - a few of you actually respect that.
1. I've said numerous times here I'm opposed to thread deletion. It would be particularly slimy of me to delete a thread then, wouldn't it? I'm opposed to it for moral reasons.
2. When making judgments, no one has all the facts. You base your judgments on the evidence before you. Every one of you makes judgments without "all" the facts. You judge this political type or that based on your armchair observations.
3. I didn't have all the facts - but some of you (hello Asterix!) seem to deliberately forget the fact that I clearly stated I may not have all the facts, but out of the facts available, the decision seemed stupid.
4. Again, Anderson - who has an email address to email me - told me of his banning and thought it was for the thread on the lounge. I first checked out that thread in its entirety, checked other posts he had made and then acted. I did my due dilligence.
5. I would/will do the same for you under similar circumstances. Sue me. For Anderson's sake, I'm disheartened to hear there are more facts. I thought he was a racist moron, but saw nothing to ban.
6. I don't believe in saying one thing in this forum and another in private messages. Maybe- just maybe - a few of you actually respect that.
I'm glad you appreciate my support though I don't think it's going to be much help to you.TQM said:
I stand by my remarks in post #5 but, if Anderson made threatening PM's I believe the mods acted responsibly.
Surely you agree?
