Busts at incalls
- Thread starter yuyu
- Start date
The police bust incalls on a "complaint basis", meaning they don't go looking for them. However, if a neighbour complained to the police about the incall then they might bust it. It's not like it never happens, but it isn't aggressively enforced.
On the other hand, Ontario courts have generally sent a first offender to "john school" rather than an actual conviction. Obviously there's no guarantee, especially if you are unlucky enough to visit an incall where some underage girl is working (even if not the one you see, the police might try and make an example out of anyone found there).
So, the odds are you won't be arrested, and if you are you will probably face only the public humiliation of standing in open court and being ordered to attend john school.
But yes what you're doing is a crime in Canada and you could be charged and convicted, and nobody can tell you otherwise so long as this law is on the books.
On the other hand, Ontario courts have generally sent a first offender to "john school" rather than an actual conviction. Obviously there's no guarantee, especially if you are unlucky enough to visit an incall where some underage girl is working (even if not the one you see, the police might try and make an example out of anyone found there).
So, the odds are you won't be arrested, and if you are you will probably face only the public humiliation of standing in open court and being ordered to attend john school.
But yes what you're doing is a crime in Canada and you could be charged and convicted, and nobody can tell you otherwise so long as this law is on the books.
Wat to look for...
The things that will get a location busted are as follows:
1) Underage..even if you suspect someone is, leave ASAP !!
2) Illegals...how you like your Latina Margaritas or your Chinese kung pow chicken or EE caviar..i'm sure we know of a few of these in the city.
3) Drug dealing-using ...i'm sure all veterans have been offered.
4) Excessive noise (loud music, fighting, screaming(lol)
5) If the place has a matress on the floor no lights she has track marks....DUH....just a matter of time...everyone's looking for cheap, cheap can become very expensive in so many ways.
The things that will get a location busted are as follows:
1) Underage..even if you suspect someone is, leave ASAP !!
2) Illegals...how you like your Latina Margaritas or your Chinese kung pow chicken or EE caviar..i'm sure we know of a few of these in the city.
3) Drug dealing-using ...i'm sure all veterans have been offered.
4) Excessive noise (loud music, fighting, screaming(lol)
5) If the place has a matress on the floor no lights she has track marks....DUH....just a matter of time...everyone's looking for cheap, cheap can become very expensive in so many ways.
I wasn't aware that John School was an option for bawdy-house offenders - I thought it was only for Communicating.gala said:
Do you have a cite?
And by the way .... Project Cathouse to Courthouse
Noteworthy that the place busted was a "massage parlor" as police have a tendency to bust MP's far more often the incall partments. This is due primarily to the street visibility of MP's and thus the fact that they attract far more complaints from civilians than incalls.
Bust of incall joints are not unknown, but happen very rarely. You would have to be cosmically unlucky to be present at the place at the very, exact time of a bust.
Bust of incall joints are not unknown, but happen very rarely. You would have to be cosmically unlucky to be present at the place at the very, exact time of a bust.
I did find a page on the Vancouver Police site related to John School: Prostitution Offender Program
However, you can find some solace in that very few people actually go to jail for bawdy - only 3% of those charged with bawdy as the only offense in 1993/4 went to jail ("Juristat" v17n2, Stats Can #85-002-XPE) and you can bet that those were recidivist owners, but no detail is available to me.
So unless gala can back up his assertion with some evidence, I don't think it would be wise to count on John School if charged with bawdy. That's sections 210 and 211 of the criminal code.
However, you can find some solace in that very few people actually go to jail for bawdy - only 3% of those charged with bawdy as the only offense in 1993/4 went to jail ("Juristat" v17n2, Stats Can #85-002-XPE) and you can bet that those were recidivist owners, but no detail is available to me.
