Charlie Sheen questions 9/11!!!!!

Rick123

Member
Oct 4, 2004
81
0
6
Mississauga
If you haven't heard, Charlie Sheen was on a radio show where he questioned 9/11 and said that the U.S. government may have carried out the attacks.

Check the show out here:
http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/200306sheen.htm

It sparked a CNN poll asking if you agree with Sheen. At the time of this post: 82% said yes, 82%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Check the poll out here:
http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/

Here is are some other clips from CNN shows about the situation:
http://www.yahoo.com/s/283228
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/ShowbizTonight20060323/ShowbizTonight20060323.wmv
 

zanner69

THE LIVING LEGEND-RETIRED
this theory that Sheen is talking about was already raised in Europe just after the U.S. attacked Iraq. When I visited Greece and Italy in the summer of 2003 - I had heated discussions with many of the people there who said exactly the same thing Sheen is saying right now.
 

Truncador

New member
Mar 21, 2005
1,714
0
0
The real villain of the piece here is the sinister hand of Big Aluminum, who fabricated the story as part of a fiendish plot to boost sales of tin-foil hats.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
47,009
5,602
113
DonQuixote said:
It does seem a bit preposterous, doesn't it?

With all the leak potential one would imagine someone on the inside
would eventually blow the whistle on such an operation. Conspiracy
theories abound. I heard the same rumor several years ago.

It's good fiction. But, so too is the Davinci Code. Not much in the
way of credable facts. I can just imagine Roger blaming the plot
on Clinton.
I would give 3:1 on Hillary
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
The thing I’ve never understood is why people care so much about what celebrities think about areas completely outside of their area of expertise. I recall some years ago, the PBS interviewing Margaret Attwood about the then roposed Canada –United States free trade agreement. She had no expertise in the area and was completely uninformed, yet they took her seriously. Who really cares what Charlie Sheen things about 911?
 

Cinema Face

New member
Mar 1, 2003
3,636
3
0
The Middle Kingdom
There’s still people who think O.J. is innocent.

There’s still people who think the US has some captured alien spacecraft in area 51.

There’s a lot of gullible people who will believe anything.
.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,663
83
48
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Hey, what do you expect from one of Martin's kids.

OTB
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,631
7,075
113
enduser1 said:
..
Sorry, Sheen is another Holywood Liberal who wants to boost his career at the expense of an unpopular president. I'll back Bush on this one. It is Sheen who is the unpatriotic slime here.

EU
Don't bad mouth charlie; he's a hobbiest after all!!!
 

LancsLad

Unstable Element
Jan 15, 2004
18,089
0
0
In a very dark place
Much as I think Sheen and all those other f***head liberal shits should shut up you have to admit at least Charlie got Denise Richards, thats more than we can say. Damn! Double Damn!!
 

assoholic

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,625
0
0
..to hold yourself up to ridicule like he his doing takes guts.I respect guts.
A good point was made on CNN tonight. If the Internet had been around during the Kennedy assassination who knows ?. Maybe they would have caught the real scumbags who killed him, not the patsy who took the fall.
Sheens basic assertion that the Government made a half hearted attempt at an investigation. Only after being pressured by the relatives of the victims of
911.
That they in fact at very least have not answered many very intelligent questions. Questions that should have been asked. That by their very omission reak of cover up.
Is so blatanly obvious that only a total moron could disagree.
What happened on 911, I dont know, but I do know we are not being told the truth.
Some will say that governments always lie, that you just have to be a team player. In serious times your either on one side or the other. I can disagree but respect those people, but like I said,
if you actually thing the govt has come clean on what happened. You are really brain dead when it comes to this stuff, intentionally or unintentionally.
 
May 3, 2004
1,686
0
0
It's not the first time Charlie has had the "guts" to hold himself up to public ridicule and humiliation. Maybe the term "guts" should be replaced with a more realistic assessment of "out of touch with reality" and "lacking in cognitive reasoning"?
 
May 3, 2004
1,686
0
0
assoholic said:
..well 82 % of the people on the poll disagree with you.
"This QuickVote is not scientific and reflects the opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of Internet users in general, nor the public as a whole. The QuickVote sponsor is not responsible for content, functionality or the opinions expressed therein"

It's like saying, those "who believe in green men from Mars invading earth in the next 5 years" would be interested in a statement from a person agreeing with their belief and then voting in a poll as to it's likely eventuality of occurring.

Strange people attract strange people. Nuff said.
 

dreamer

New member
Sep 10, 2001
1,164
0
0
Maple
assoholic said:
.A good point was made on CNN tonight. If the Internet had been around during the Kennedy assassination who knows ?. Maybe they would have caught the real scumbags who killed him, not the patsy who took the fall
The internet loves conspiracies and is great at spreading false information that is taken for fact.

People prefer conspiracies and evil government departments than simple explanations. Many cannot accept that one man got off some lucky shots or that terrorists implemented a simple but deadly plan.

Before 9/11, airport security was not designed to prevent suicide fanatics from taking control of planes for the purpose of flying them into buildings, even though there were warning signs. The coverup is to protect those who should have prevented it, not a coverup that the Bush administration actually did it. People just prefer to believe the latter.
 

assoholic

New member
Aug 30, 2004
1,625
0
0
..the US Government is covering up the truth, thats what is being said, not sure where the confusion lies.
 

Rick123

Member
Oct 4, 2004
81
0
6
Mississauga
If you guys want to make more informed opinions, check out the following:

Quick link for busy people:
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/911-for-very-busy-people.html

Some links to longer video documentaries:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3498980438587461603&q=eyewitness

Forget a celebrity's opinion, how about a Physics PhD's:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Another video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6495462761605341661&q=alex+jones

And plenty more info at any of your requests (be specific what you would like; video, documents, audio etc.)

Lets have an informed debate.
 

dreamer

New member
Sep 10, 2001
1,164
0
0
Maple
Hufschmid is a fine example of someone who sees conspiracies everywhere and literally thousands of websites setup that present his theories as fact.

I have read, but I a not sure if it is true, that he also believes a missile hit the Pentagon and that the moon landing was a hoax. I suppose it is good to ask questions but hows does he become such an expert on so many topics.
 

Gyaos

BOBA FETT
Aug 17, 2001
6,172
0
0
Heaven, definately Heaven
Maybe someone can leak those documents saying Bush Jr. ordered the attacks and impeach the whole administration. I'm sure if I flipped a 2-headed coin, someone will find something in which Bush Jr. had a hand in either having it happen, or allowing it to happen for an abuse of power.

But I won't forget CNBC saying "a 737 hit the tower" at the moment the first tower fell. How did that dumb female anchor know it was specifically a 737? Did she just panic 'cuz there was never a 3rd plane involved? Or was it just a rich media/government induced attempt to frighten all the couch potatoes of America to gain market share and promote future illegal wars, take away future civil rights and keep the poor even poorer for as long as possible. Think about that everytime the numbers change with a media hypnotic flash on every minute of a CNBC broadcast.

If they can leak the NSA, they gotta find that doc!

Gyaos
 

dreamer

New member
Sep 10, 2001
1,164
0
0
Maple
scroll99 said:
Sites like these just confuse those easily confused. The proof that they are asking for is extremely difficult because of the situation. They even compare a fire in a Madrid hotel to the Twin Towers. That is like comparing apples to oranges.

If they were serious about not misleading people, the contest should have been for those that can prove that is was bombs that caused the destructive, not two jets carrying jet fuel slamming into them.

I did see a report on CNN by a expert about how the steel melted and what caused the steel frame to fail. Once the steel frame failed it was inevitable that the towers would collapse. If I can find the report I will link it.
 
Toronto Escorts