DANG 35 seconds

[daty]

what kind of rate per hour would she earn....gotta read most of the article


http://www.therecord.com/news/news_02062191417.html

 

[rdhaired_vixen]

wow is all i got

makes me yearn for the days of the minute man lmao ..

 

[Willywants]

Age Old Profession!!

So Ripped!
Are you saying that prostitution isn't all it's "cracked" up to be??

Willy

 

[james t kirk]

Another holier than thou article based on one interview from one dumb cop with nothing better to do at 5:00 am in kitchener, save maybe sucking back some jelly doughnuts at Tim Hortons.

Sure there are some crack addicted street walkers out there i am sure, but there are also crack addicted cops, reporters, and politicians i bet too. Even in Kitchener.

So what.

The article is somewhat slanted and implies that all prostitutes are crack whores, were traumatized by men, etc., which simply isn't the case. Yes there are risks associated with prostitution, maybe more so than your average stay at home mom, but there are risks in any job; more garbage collectors are injured on the job than cops.

It's just more sensationalism to sell newpapers.

Society as a whole, myself probably included in there, find the issue of sex interesting. Case in point, did anyone see what they did to Clinton ??

I guess the idea that anyone is a crack whore is quite sad. Personally, I would choose not to knowingly support any such habit, there are far too many spectacular SP's out there who have no such vices, view their clients with a healthy attitude, and are professionals.

The drug habit is a shame, but if someone doesn't want to change, they are not going to. I think there are programs out there to help addicts kick the habit, maybe this reporter could do a more investigative story on addictive drug habits of people out there and what got them into and why they don't want to stop. Oh wait, it's already been done a million times.

Bottom line, men need sex and you will never stop that.

If you are single, you need an outlet (and since women do not so readily dispense with sex, we have a need for professionals). If women were as easy as men, there would be no prostitutes, but they aren't, so there is. Maybe these married guys are in a sexless relationship, or their wives won't cater to their desires (head for example), what are you supposed to do then?? What's a single guy who needs some human touching supposed to do?? Truth be told, SP's help society by preventing sexual frustrations from building up to the boiling point in men. Men are most dangerous to women when they are overly horny.

Society tends to view men who frequent prostitutes as weak, or not in control. Did anyone ever think that they are simply doing what nature is comanding them to do - have sex with women. They use that thing between their ears and think, I don't want to rape, that's hurting someone, but I NEED sex. And well, here is a woman who for a fee will give me that, and satisfy my carnal urges. No-one is hurt.

 

[Knave]

Excerpt from a Letter sent to the K/W Record

This is an excerpt from a Letter I just sent to the Record. Will they publish it?
The “Crackdown on prostitution” article read like it was written by-and-for Sgt. Pete Richards. None of the hard questions seemed to be asked or answered – because Richards wanted to focus on the success of arresting nine “Johns” – and not their failure to control "crack".
A few questions for Sgt. Richards:
Sgt. Richards; you said “about 15 women work as prostitutes (some) near a crack house.” . . . Having said that, you must know where the crackhouse(s) are . . . So when will you be report a “Crackdown on Crackhouses” – after all, you know where they are?

Sgt. Richards; you said . . . “All the (15) women have crack cocaine addictions and have sex to support their expensive habits” . . . Having said that, has the department considered sending them to “Crack School.” . . . Wouldn’t that also curb prostitution, and crack dependence, in Kitchener.

Sgt. Richards; you said . . . “As long as there is crack, there will be prostitution” . . . I think the reads would like to ask “Okay, so what’s being done about crack then? Arresting nine guys for November’s John School is good PR, but what about solving what you say is the source of the problem – “crack.”

Sgt. Richards; you said . . . “ you watched a woman have sex in a car, leave to smoke crack and return to the street to earn more money (and) in some cases, a woman can repeat the pattern up to 15 times a day” . . . The natural question is; Did any of these observations result in the arrest of a crack dealer? Reads might think frightening the guys why patronize Kitchener’s 15 prostitutes looks more like PR that good solid police work. What is being done about what the department has identified as the root-source, “Crack Houses in Kitchener?”

Personally, I think Sgt. Pete Richards controlled the article all the way. He throw us a copy-bone about guys who can do the nasty in 35 seconds, he made it sound like the police are on top of things, and he got in his “John School” PR stuff to keep his carrier riding high.

More and more articles are titillating police department PR fluff. Papers, like the Reporter, should dig deeper and ask harder questions – like “why” – if they expect their “news” to remain relevant.