EU Approves Decision to Completely Ban Russian Gas Imports by 2028

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,399
2,693
113
Ghawar
Oct 20, 2025

The Council of the European Union on Monday approved a decision to ban all imports of Russian natural gas, marking a major milestone in the EU’s roadmap to end its dependence on Russian energy. The move follows years of concerns over Moscow’s use of gas as a “political weapon,” which repeatedly disrupted Europe’s energy markets.

The newly adopted regulation introduces a gradual and legally binding phase-out of Russian gas imports — both via pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) — culminating in a complete ban effective January 1, 2028.

The Council maintained this final deadline, describing the agreement as an ambitious signal of the EU’s commitment to achieving energy independence and security.

Lars Aagaard, Denmark’s Minister for Climate, Energy and Utilities, who currently chairs the EU Energy Council, stated:

“An energy-independent Europe is a stronger and safer Europe. We have worked hard over the past years to eliminate Russian oil and gas from Europe, but we are not at the finish line yet.”

According to the decision, imports of Russian gas will be prohibited starting January 1, 2026, while allowing a limited transitional period for contracts signed before June 17, 2025.

Under the agreement:

Short-term contracts signed before that date may continue until June 17, 2026.

Long-term contracts may extend until January 1, 2028.

Existing contracts may be amended only for specific operational purposes, provided such changes do not increase imported volumes, with limited flexibility granted to landlocked member states affected by changes in supply routes.

The regulation also requires all EU member states to submit national plans outlining strategies to diversify gas supplies and manage challenges in transitioning away from Russian energy sources. Exemptions apply to countries that can prove they no longer receive any direct or indirect Russian gas imports.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
102,452
29,155
113
There is a global change going on.
China is pushing solar and controls 70% of the market globally.
america is pushing oil$gas and controls about 25% of that market

One is getting cheaper and one is getting more expensive and starting to run out.

 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,973
4,336
113
There is a global change going on.
China is pushing solar and controls 70% of the market globally.
america is pushing oil$gas and controls about 25% of that market

One is getting cheaper and one is getting more expensive and starting to run out.


solar is not cheaper
if it were
#1. the switch over would have occurred -80% of energy supply is met via fossil fuels, down from 81% decades ago
#2. there would be no need for govts to spend trillions subsiding renewables
#3 there is no way in hell solar will displace a meaningful fraction of fossil fuels
#4 govts are driving full speed down the debt spiral nightmare, driven by foolish spending including subsidising green energy scams

starting to run out.
not anytime soon
AI Overview


Global oil reserves have generally been increasing over the long term, with proven reserves rising from 1,746.8 billion barrels at the end of 2022 to 1,754.6 billion barrels at the end of 2023.
 

Attachments

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
491
706
93
The Russians have already accepted that they aren't going to be exporting directly to the EU anymore and they don't care. There are other markets for the oil and gas the EU could import.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Musketeer

Well-known member
Nov 17, 2002
7,564
299
83
69
Mississauga
The Russians have already accepted that they aren't going to be exporting directly to the EU anymore and they don't care. There are other markets for the oil and gas the EU could import.
Pity we don't have any new pipelines built to supply Europe. Trudeau made sure that our traditional energy oil and gas remained in the ground. Pity, Canada could have been a rich country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
102,452
29,155
113
solar is not cheaper
if it were
#1. the switch over would have occurred -80% of energy supply is met via fossil fuels, down from 81% decades ago
#2. there would be no need for govts to spend trillions subsiding renewables
#3 there is no way in hell solar will displace a meaningful fraction of fossil fuels
#4 govts are driving full speed down the debt spiral nightmare, driven by foolish spending including subsidising green energy scams


not anytime soon
You clearly haven't learned anything new in 25 years or more.

 

seanzo

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2008
491
706
93
Pity we don't have any new pipelines built to supply Europe. Trudeau made sure that our traditional energy oil and gas remained in the ground. Pity, Canada could have been a rich country.
It's far worse than that...the US is importing our oil and gas at a discount and exporting it to the EU at a profit while simultaneously claiming we are "taking advantage of them." We are a meme nation, truely fucking pathetic
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts