Yeah, we Canadians bitch about adscam.PHNINE said:Yeah I caught it on TMN last night as well. I saw it when it came out in the theaters and remembered how pissed I was after. Well again it only reinforced my views on the Bush administration. Dubbya and his band of old men are a dirty bunch, and only years from now when it is all said and done will it be revealed how dirty they actually are. Their is billions of dollars being made by a select group of people and the American public just chooses not to see it. Even Clinton who was thought to be immoral or what not did not make billions in corporate gain, and he was almost impeached for getting head. I would rather my president get head, then go to war for oil. You are right Rami, this documentary was brilliant.![]()
They both have their own agendas.Don said:Michael Moore is the left's version of Bill O'Reilly.
Don't be so naive. Moore does NOT LOVE Canada. Moore (like many Americans w/an agenda) like to use Canada for his own agenda. As long as Canada fits HIS vision of how it should be he will praise it. He lost what little respect I had for him when he (as an all knowing American) was lecturing us on who to vote for in OUR elections last year (don't vote for Bush, Jr. - Harper... not understanding that we do not vote specifically for a PM specifically like for Prez in the US). Don't you hate when the US tells us how we should run our country? But where was the outrage when Moore was telling us who we should vote for? We would have lost his LOVE if the Conservatives won. Just like we would have gained LOVE from O'Reilly if the Conservatives won.james t kirk said:They both have their own agendas.
With one HUGE difference.
Michael Moore LOVES Canada. Bill O'Reilly HATES Canada with a passion.
Guess which guy I like more.
He is working on "Sicko", a view about health care. However, it is getting harder to make movies for him because nobody wants to be interviewed by him anymore. That's why he is low key.Scarey said:It's funny...since the last election he has little to say about politics.It's almost like he has been thinking"what else do I have to show you folks?"
Ummm they WERE directly related to Osama and he stated so in the film. If memory serves they were aunts uncles and a couple of nephews I think.....civic82 said:he gave a lot of details with names but he never once mentioned a single name of the 'Bin Ladens' that took off shortly after 911. Now could they be just Bin Ladens NOT related to Osama?
I agree with you 130%tboy said:I approached Farenheit 9/11 with this attitude: if only 20% of what he said was true, that is TOO much.
As for bowling for columbine: Did he say anything that wasn't true? ANYWHERE in the film? I don't think so.....
Just remember: we NEED people like Moore to show the other side of the coin, it is all about checks and balances. If we didn't have people like him around just imagine what the Bush's of the world would be doing?