The current liberal government would rather waste time and money tackling a non existent gun control problem than devote resources to tackle this type of nonsense red tape bull carney trudumb shite.
Gun control worked in Australia.The point of gun control isn't to tackle the problem but it is to give the illusion of the government tackling the problem. In other words it's red meat to the base.....or rather it's beyond meat to the base
How many mass shootings per year and per capita vs the USA?
Exactly, Australia had one.
You must be including criminal on criminal violence, with illegal guns to justify saying, "a few every day". It's a step towards an honest conversation, but how exactly does criminalizing law abiding citizens prevent those from happening?Exactly, Australia had one.
america has a few every day.
Law abiding citizens don't have to worry as much if they know the chances of criminals having and using guns are way lower.You must be including criminal on criminal violence, with illegal guns to justify saying, "a few every day". It's a step towards an honest conversation, but how exactly does criminalizing law abiding citizens prevent those from happening?
The chances of criminals using guns doesn't go any lower, regardless of the number of ineffective laws passed; they're criminals.Law abiding citizens don't have to worry as much if they know the chances of criminals having and using guns are way lower.
The chances of criminals using guns goes lower if its harder to get guns.The chances of criminals using guns doesn't go any lower, regardless of the number of ineffective laws passed; they're criminals.
Taking guns away from law abiding citizens has no effect on criminals' ability to get guns. Just look at the past six years in Canada, since the Nova Scotia shooting and gun bans; are criminals any less armed? No, because they don't obey laws to begin with.The chances of criminals using guns goes lower if its harder to get guns.
Feelings over facts, gotcha.Although I would agree this buyback program will not solve a thing, I do like the fact that it is pissing off the American-wannabe ammosexuals, so I guess I am in favour of this.
I have no idea why you would think that is true.Taking guns away from law abiding citizens has no effect on criminals' ability to get guns. Just look at the past six years in Canada, since the Nova Scotia shooting and gun bans; are criminals any less armed? No, because they don't obey laws to begin with.
Mass shootings or "mass shootings"? Are they padding those numbers with gangland violence, which again, would not be affected by removing legally owned firearms from citizens?I have no idea why you would think that is true.
Goal posts moved.Mass shootings or "mass shootings"? Are they padding those numbers with gangland violence, which again, would not be affected by removing legally owned firearms from citizens?
The goal posts were designed, by Democrats and Liberals, to move. "Mass shooting" has such a fluid and flexible definition to suit the whatver confiscation narrative is being peddled at the time.Goal posts moved.
Shall I post gun death stats now?
Or are you going to just declare that america's gang problems are the worst of any developed nation because of brown people?





