Reverie

HRW on Iran and Syria

reboot

New member
Jul 20, 2004
130
0
0
Hamilton
TQM said:
...Nothing here new or surprising...
True. Although the choice of Iran and Syria begs a question. Do you care about human rights or just Iran and Syria?

If you care about human rights, the purpose of the reports linked, then maybe it would have been appropriate to link to the broader HRW listing of countries. They have reports of human rights abuses world wide. Iran and Syria are probably not the most news worthy sources of abuses at this time.

http://hrw.org/countries.html

If you just care to bolster a case that Iran and Syria should be viewed negatively by your audience, then it raises a question as to whether these links to incidents of human rights abuse have any bearing as such. Human rights abuses are not the issue, rather just one more marginal claim against these targets of current US administration foreign policy.
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
Human Rights abuses are always

the issue for me.

But these two nations were obviously chosen for a reason.
 

scouser1

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2001
5,663
94
48
Pickering
every single nation in that neighbourhood has a lousy humans rights record, some worse than others of course but one has to ask whether the original poster has biases in singling out Syria and Iran.
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
scouser

stop being an imbecile.

There's about 15 to 20 fucking moronic posts attacking Israel for exactly the same things -and none of them point to the fact that the rest of the nations in the region have bad records. In fact, little one, you've been active in some of these Jew-baiting threads.

So I go and post the exact same kind of thing knowing with absolute certainty that you or someone equally pea-brained will come by and say - "Oh these nations shouldn't be singled out." Funny how you don't say that when the same posters attack Israel again and again and again.

What I'm saying - dickhead - is that you're a fucking shill. When it's against Israel, you get up and cheer. When it's against another Middle East nation - ooooh it's so unfair to single them out.

Dickwad.
 

scouser1

Well-known member
Dec 7, 2001
5,663
94
48
Pickering
TQM said:
stop being an imbecile.

There's about 15 to 20 fucking moronic posts attacking Israel for exactly the same things -and none of them point to the fact that the rest of the nations in the region have bad records. In fact, little one, you've been active in some of these Jew-baiting threads.

So I go and post the exact same kind of thing knowing with absolute certainty that you or someone equally pea-brained will come by and say - "Oh these nations shouldn't be singled out." Funny how you don't say that when the same posters attack Israel again and again and again.

What I'm saying - dickhead - is that you're a fucking shill. When it's against Israel, you get up and cheer. When it's against another Middle East nation - ooooh it's so unfair to single them out.

Dickwad.

isnt there an age limit on this board, I mean are 9th graders really allowed to post here :D
 

persis

New member
Jan 26, 2007
1,281
0
0
TQM said:
Really?

Intellectual cowardice.

Israelis 'may have deliberately targeted Reuters cameraman'

http://news.scotsman.com/middleeastconflict/Israelis-39may-have-deliberately-targeted.4001435.jp
Published Date: 21 April 2008
By Ben Lynfield

A PALESTINIAN cameraman killed by Israeli tank fire in the Gaza Strip last week may have been deliberately targeted, the campaign group Human Rights Watch said yesterday, as the death toll from the incident rose to six .
Two Palestinian teenagers, Ahmed al-Najjar and Bilal al-Dhaimi, died of wounds they sustained when tank shells sprayed Reuters cameraman Fadel Shana's pick-up with flachettes, or tiny darts, as he was filming last Wednesday. Three other bystanders
ADVERTISEMENT
, aged between 13 and 22, were also killed.

Human Rights Watch said an on-site investigation over the weekend "found evidence suggesting that the tank crew fired recklessly or deliberately at the journalist's team".

Joe Stork, the group's Middle East director, said: "Israeli soldiers did not make sure they were aiming at a military target before firing, and there is evidence suggesting they actually targeted the journalists."

Interviews with an eyewitness, a resident in a nearby village and a journalist who arrived just after the shelling, as well as Mr Shana's footage, indicated there was no military activity by Palestinian militants at the scene, according to Human Rights Watch.

Mr Stork said: "The Reuters truck was clearly marked TV and Press, and drove by the tank twice, so it's hard to believe the Israeli tank crew didn't see the pick-up contained only journalists."

The Israeli army said troops did not deliberately target journalists. A spokeswoman said Mr Shana had been killed "in a warfare zone", adding: "When journalists enter a warfare zone, they take the risk they might get hurt."

Meanwhile, Israel forces yesterday carried out air strikes across the Gaza Strip, a day after members of Hamas's armed wing, Izzedin al-Qassam, detonated explosives-laden vehicles at the Kerem Shalom border crossing. Israel said it had killed six Hamas fighters.
 

persis

New member
Jan 26, 2007
1,281
0
0
Israel/Occupied Territories: Human Rights Concerns for the 61st Session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/03/10/isrlpa10290.htm
Objective

.......


Contribute to Human Rights Watch
Background


Parties to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continue to ignore basic standards of human rights law and the laws of war. The current intifada, now in its fifth year, has resulted in the killing of more than 4,200 people and injured tens of thousands of people. The overwhelming majority of casualties were civilians. More than three-quarters of the dead were Palestinian.

The intensity of violence by Israeli security forces and Palestinian armed groups involving harm to civilians varied with political developments. Other Israeli violations such as house demolitions, restrictions on freedom of movement amounting to collective punishment, and illegal settlement expansion continued at a high level.

Impunity of Israeli Security Forces. Israel has failed to investigate numerous cases of suspicious killings of unarmed Palestinian civilians by its security forces. The investigative procedures of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are not independent, impartial, thorough, or timely, as required by international human rights law. They rarely bring wrongdoers to justice, and have had little deterrent effect. Investigators rarely consult Palestinian witnesses, and when investigations do occur, deaths and injuries to Palestinians are treated less seriously than other infractions or violations, and differently from cases where those harmed by the IDF are Jewish Israelis.

The Wall. In July 2004 the International Court of Justice found that the construction of the wall in the Occupied Territories, as opposed to along the 1967 “Green line,” is contrary to international law. Nonetheless, construction of the wall continues and half of the route is built or under construction. The route as released by the Ministry of Defense on February 20, 2005, is 670 km long, more than twice the length of the Green Line. This revised wall route, including the expanded boundaries of East Jerusalem, incorporates approximately 10% of West Bank land where it deviates from the Green Line. The area trapped between the wall and the Green Line (the “Seam Zone”) is in essence a closed military area. Currently the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs projects that 49,416 Palestinians and 170,123 Israeli settlers will be located in this area. If East Jerusalem is included, the numbers for both Palestinians and Israelis increases significantly. Many additional Palestinians are affected when their land is incorporated into the Seam Zone but they reside east of the wall. Israeli settlers or any person of Jewish descent from anywhere in the world can move freely in and out and around the Seam Zone, while Palestinians living or working between the wall and the Green Line must apply for permits to continue living in their homes or to access their means of livelihood.

The wall has aggravated already crippling restrictions on freedom of movement, and imperils essential access to education, work, water, and family life. The barrier’s route reinforces the pernicious human rights consequences of Israel’s illegal settlement activity in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It threatens to deprive Palestinians further of their land and livelihoods.

The wall clearly has the potential to constitute a permanent change to occupied territory – forbidden by customary international law (1907 Hague Regulations on Land Warfare, Art. 55).

Disengagement. The Israeli government has approved the initial stages of the disengagement plan for removing settlers from the Gaza Strip and four small northern West Bank settlements. Human Rights Watch welcomes steps that will reduce the extent to which Palestinians are subject to day-to-day contact with Israeli troops that are often abusive. However, as currently discussed, Israel’s “disengagement” from the Gaza Strip would not end its occupation of the area in legal terms because of major ongoing restrictions. Although responsibility for security within the Gaza Strip would be handed over to the Palestinian Authority’s forces, Israel would maintain control over: Gaza’s borders, airspace and sea space; all entry and exit points in Gaza; and electricity, water and sewage. These restrictions would greatly impede Palestinians’ efforts to build an economy capable of autonomously satisfying the basic humanitarian needs of the residents of Gaza. Until those restrictions are lifted, Israel will retain its responsibilities under international humanitarian law as an occupying power to provide for the humanitarian welfare of the Palestinian people. Insofar as restrictions are imposed on Palestinian police capacity, Israel may also retain responsibility for the protection of civilians in Gaza.

The disengagement of the Gaza and four northern West Bank settlements, moreover, has not been linked to a broader withdrawal of all settlements located in the Occupied Territories, including in and around East Jerusalem, that have been built in contravention of the International Humanitarian Law prohibitions against transfer of civilian populations and making permanent changes that do not benefit protected persons.

Unlawful Home Demolitions. Israel’s current disengagement plan contemplates continued demolitions of hundreds or perhaps thousands more homes to widen further the “buffer zone” along the Philadelphi corridor running along the Rafah border with Egypt. Since 2000, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) has illegally destroyed hundreds of homes to expand the buffer zone south of Rafah, which is now up to 300 meters wide. Sixteen thousand people, more than 10 percent of Rafah’s population, have lost their homes. The majority of these houses were destroyed in violation of international humanitarian law because the destruction was done without clear military necessity. In 2003, the IDF completed construction of an eight-meter-high metal wall in the already cleared zone to protect its troops, and IDF soldiers patrol the border behind this wall. Despite this extra protection, the rate of home demolitions in Rafah tripled in 2003 in comparison with the previous two years.

Human Rights Watch’s detailed investigation of the Rafah border zone, published as a 133-page report in October 2004, found that the IDF has apparently failed to explore well-established methods to detect and destroy tunnels—like seismic sensors, electromagnetic induction and ground-penetrating radar—that have been used effectively on the Mexican-U.S. border and the Korean demilitarized zone. The use of those methods would have allowed destruction of smuggling tunnels without the massive destruction of Palestinian homes.

.......
Need for Addressing Human Rights in Peace Negotiations. Human Rights Watch is concerned about the absence of human rights norms and a dedicated human rights monitoring mechanism in any peace negotiation framework. The “Quartet” roadmap, which was adopted in UN Security Council Resolution 1515 (2003), and the unofficial Geneva Accords which were published in 2003, did not reference human rights standards or monitoring mechanisms. The ceasefire agreement reached in Sharm al-Sheikh in February 2005 was also devoid of human rights content.

......
There have been no trials of by the Palestinian Authority of persons suspected of responsibility for such attacks, but under President Abbas, it has strongly opposed attacks on civilians and replaced security officials in the wake of attacks. Palestinian Authority security forces reportedly arrested Islamic Jihad suspects in Tulkarm following a suicide bombing in Tel Aviv in late February 2005 that killed five Israeli civilians.

Recommendations

Commission members, bearing in mind the parties’ obligations as High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions, should:


* Condemn systematic violations of international humanitarian and human rights law by Palestinian armed groups as well as Israel.


* Call on Israel to investigate and hold accountable security forces suspected of unlawful killings of civilians.


* Call on the Palestinian Authority to investigate and hold accountable security forces under its control or armed groups under its jurisdiction who are responsible for carrying out attacks targeting or causing indiscriminate harm to civilians, or perpetrating extrajudicial executions.


* Condemn the harmful impact of the separation barrier’s route on Palestinian rights of access to work, family life, water, education, health, and freedom of movement. Express concern about the barrier’s potential violation of Article 55 of the 1907 Hague Regulations, which prohibits making permanent changes to occupied territory that do not benefit the protected population.


* Urge Israel to end all settlement activity on lands occupied in 1967 as a violation of customary international law, Article 49 (6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and human rights law.


* Call on Israel to cease all house demolitions that do not meet the criteria of absolute military necessity, and to provide full reparations and compensation to owners of unlawfully demolished homes.


* Call for the inclusion of human rights norms and a dedicated human rights monitoring mechanism in all peace negotiation frameworks
 

persis

New member
Jan 26, 2007
1,281
0
0
Israel/Lebanon: Qana Death Toll at 28
International Inquiry Needed into Israeli Air Strike

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/08/02/lebano13899_txt.htm
– A preliminary Human Rights Watch investigation into the July 30 Israeli air strike in Qana found that 28 people are confirmed dead thus far, among them 16 children, Human Rights Watch said today.
“The deaths in Qana were the predictable result of Israel’s indiscriminate bombing campaign in Lebanon,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, director of the Middle East and North Africa division at Human Rights Watch. “Only an impartial international investigation can find out what really took place.”

The initial estimate of 54 persons killed was based on a register of 63 persons who had sought shelter in the basement of the building that was struck, and rescue teams having located nine survivors. It now appears that at least 22 people escaped the basement, and 28 are confirmed dead, according to records from the Lebanese Red Cross and the government hospital in Tyre.

Thirteen people remain missing, and some Qana residents fear they are buried in the rubble, although recovery efforts have stopped.

Human Rights Watch conducted detailed interviews with two witnesses to the Qana attack, including one person who was in the building during the strike, and a second person who lived in the neighborhood and assisted in the recovery effort.

According to Muhammad Mahmud Shalhub, a 61-year-old farmer who was in the basement during the attack, 63 members of the extended Shalhub and Hashim families sought shelter in three ground-floor rooms of a solid three-story building when the first bombs hit the village. Israeli planes began attacking the area in the early evening of July 29, he said, striking more than 50 times. He explained how, around 1 a.m. on July 30, an Israeli munition hit the ground floor of the home:

It felt like someone lifted the house. The ground floor of the house is 2.5 meters high. When the first strike hit, it hit below us and the whole house lifted, the rocket hit under the house. I was sitting by the door – it got very dusty and smoky – and we were all in shock. I was not injured and found myself [thrown] outside. There was a lot of screaming inside. When I tried to go back in, I couldn’t see because of the smoke. I started pushing people out; whomever I could find.

Five minutes later, another air strike came and hit the other side of the building, behind us. After the second strike, we could barely breathe and we couldn’t see anything. There were three rooms in the house where people were hiding [on the ground floor]. After the first strike, a lot of earth was pushed up into the rooms. We only managed to find some people in the first room.

Shalhub vigorously denied that any Hezbollah fighters were present in or around the home when the attack took place. All four roads to Qana village had been cut by Israeli bombs, he said, which would have made it difficult, if not impossible, for Hezbollah to move rocket launchers into the village.

“If they [the IDF] really saw the rocket launcher, where did it go?” Shalhub said. “We showed Israel our dead; why don’t the Israelis show us the rocket launchers?”

Ghazi `Udaybi, another Qana villager who rushed to the house when it was hit at 1 a.m., gave an account consistent with Shalhub’s. He and others removed a number of people from the building after the first strike, he said, but they could remove no one else after the second strike hit five minutes later. “If Hezbollah was firing near the house, would a family of over 50 people just sit there?” he said to Human Rights Watch.

The Israeli government initially claimed that the military targeted the house because Hezbollah fighters had fired rockets from the area. Human Rights Watch researchers who visited Qana on July 31, the day after the attack, did not find any destroyed military equipment in or near the home. Similarly, none of the dozens of international journalists, rescue workers and international observers who visited Qana on July 30 and 31 reported seeing any evidence of Hezbollah military presence in or around the home. Rescue workers recovered no bodies of apparent Hezbollah fighters from inside or near the building.

The IDF subsequently changed its story, with one of Israel’s top military correspondents reporting on August 1 that, “It now appears that the military had no information on rockets launched from the site of the building, or the presence of Hezbollah men at the time.”

“Again and again, Israeli forces have fired at dubious military targets with a high civilian cost,” Whitson said. “Their brazen behavior has costs hundreds of lives.”

The names of those confirmed killed from Lebanese Red Cross and Tyre hospital records are:


1. Ahmad Mahmud Shalhub, 55
2. Ibrahim Hashim, 65
3. Hasna' Hashim, 75
4. `Ali Ahmad Hashim, 3
5. `Abbas Ahmad Hashim, 9 months
6. Hura’ Muhammad Qassim Shalhub, 12
7. Mahdi Mahmud Hashim, 68
8. Zahra Muhammad Qassim Shalhub, 2
9. Ibrahim Ahmad Hashim, 7
10. Ja`far Mahmud Hashim, 10
11. Lina Muhammad Mahmud Shalhub, 30
12. Nabila `Ali Amin Shalhub, 40
13. `Ula Ahmad Mahmud Shalhub, 25
14. Khadija `Ali Yusif, 31
15. Taysir `Ali Shalhub, 39
16. Zaynab Muhammad `Ali Amin Shalhub, 6
17. Fatima Muhammad Hashim, 4
18. `Ali Ahmad Mahmud Shalhub, 17
19. Maryam Hassan Muhsin, 30
20. `Afaf al-Zabad, 45
21. Yahya Muhammad Qassim Shalhub, 9
22. `Ali Muhammad Kassim Shalhub, 10
23. Yusif Ahmad Mahmud Shalhub, 6
24. Qassim Samih Shalhub, 9
25. Hussain Ahmad Hashim, 12
26. Qassim Muhammad Shalhub, 7
27. Raqiyya Mahmud Shalhub, 7
28. Raqiyya Muhammad Hashim, unknown
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
persis said:
Israel/Occupied Territories: Human Rights Concerns for the 61st Session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/03/10/isrlpa10290.htm
Objective

.......


Contribute to Human Rights Watch
Background




Unlawful Home Demolitions. Israel’s current disengagement plan contemplates continued demolitions of hundreds or perhaps thousands more homes to widen further the “buffer zone” along the Philadelphi corridor running along the Rafah border with Egypt. Since 2000, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) has illegally destroyed hundreds of homes to expand the buffer zone south of Rafah, which is now up to 300 meters wide. Sixteen thousand people, more than 10 percent of Rafah’s population, have lost their homes. The majority of these houses were destroyed in violation of international humanitarian law because the destruction was done without clear military necessity. In 2003, the IDF completed construction of an eight-meter-high metal wall in the already cleared zone to protect its troops, and IDF soldiers patrol the border behind this wall. Despite this extra protection, the rate of home demolitions in Rafah tripled in 2003 in comparison with the previous two years.

Human Rights Watch’s detailed investigation of the Rafah border zone, published as a 133-page report in October 2004, found that the IDF has apparently failed to explore well-established methods to detect and destroy tunnels—like seismic sensors, electromagnetic induction and ground-penetrating radar—that have been used effectively on the Mexican-U.S. border and the Korean demilitarized zone. The use of those methods would have allowed destruction of smuggling tunnels without the massive destruction of Palestinian homes.
It was during one the many illegal home demolitions that Rachel Corrie was murdered by Israeli soldiers. Had Israel followed the law, she and many other Palestinians would still be alive.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,631
7,074
113
Since scouser doesn't like bad words, I'll edit this very true post.

TQM(edited version) said:
stop being a [fool].

There's about 15 to 20 [biased] posts attacking Israel for exactly the same things -and none of them point to the fact that the rest of the nations in the region have bad records. In fact, [considered fellow terbite], you've been active in some of these Jew-baiting threads.

So I go and post the exact same kind of thing knowing with absolute certainty that you or someone equally [thoughtful] will come by and say - "Oh these nations shouldn't be singled out." Funny how you don't say that when the same posters attack Israel again and again and again.

What I'm saying - [brother] - is that you're a [dishonest] shill. When it's against Israel, you get up and cheer. When it's against another Middle East nation - ooooh it's so unfair to single them out.

[sincerely]
And persis evidently has no trouble proving his point.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
basketcase said:
Since scouser doesn't like bad words, I'll edit this very true post.



And persis evidently has no trouble proving his point.
Since every one of the sources selected by Persis are legitimate, you'd better go back to square one.

As we can see in your rewrite of TQM, you've learned a lot from your usual sources, MEMRI and Camera and have learned how to fabricate original text to serve your purposes.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,631
7,074
113
gryfin said:
Since every one of the sources selected by Persis are legitimate, you`d better go back to square one.

...
Here`s a list of persis` legitimate" sources .

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0be_1172928213

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxvO_...eature=related

“National Iranian American Council sent me a press release” (undocumented source)

In this one, he claims to have read a newly published Hebrew only book https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2091141#post2091141

http://users.sedona.net/~sepa/sardari.pdf

http://www.godandscience.org/apologe...ll_israel.html

http://www.bloggernews.net/111249

http://www.seraphicpress.com/archive...l_israel_1.php

http://youtube.com/watch?v=bY1TT4I2ohI&feature=related

http://www.ummah.com/waragainstislam/neoconthreat.htm

http://forums.familytreedna.com/showthread.php?p=24270

http://youtube.com/watch?v=okLFCQTO-a0&feature=related (btw. John Hagee videos)

http://www.iranian.com/PhotoDay/2004/August/jk.html

http://www.answering-christianity.co...n_revealed.htm

http://submission.org/God/

youtube again and again

http://www.iranianmovies.com/Merchan...oduct_Count=14

http://www.greatomar.com/thekeeper/trailer.html

http://www.rostamfilm.com/

even more youtube

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/.../post_155.html

http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m41657&hd=&size=1&l=e


Add to this that he routinely posts from sources without referencing them.
such as http://moderate.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/why-israel-has-no-right-to-exist-as-a-jewish-state/

(I could go back further than through his post history but the point is made with less than the past 3 months)

Who knows, some of these might be valid sources or they could just be the media puppets of the Iranian regime.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
basketcase said:
Here`s a list of persis` legitimate" sources .

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0be_1172928213

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxvO_...eature=related

“National Iranian American Council sent me a press release” (undocumented source)

In this one, he claims to have read a newly published Hebrew only book https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2091141#post2091141

http://users.sedona.net/~sepa/sardari.pdf

http://www.godandscience.org/apologe...ll_israel.html

http://www.bloggernews.net/111249

http://www.seraphicpress.com/archive...l_israel_1.php

http://youtube.com/watch?v=bY1TT4I2ohI&feature=related

http://www.ummah.com/waragainstislam/neoconthreat.htm

http://forums.familytreedna.com/showthread.php?p=24270

http://youtube.com/watch?v=okLFCQTO-a0&feature=related (btw. John Hagee videos)

http://www.iranian.com/PhotoDay/2004/August/jk.html

http://www.answering-christianity.co...n_revealed.htm

http://submission.org/God/

youtube again and again

http://www.iranianmovies.com/Merchan...oduct_Count=14

http://www.greatomar.com/thekeeper/trailer.html

http://www.rostamfilm.com/

even more youtube

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/.../post_155.html

http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m41657&hd=&size=1&l=e


Add to this that he routinely posts from sources without referencing them.
such as http://moderate.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/why-israel-has-no-right-to-exist-as-a-jewish-state/

(I could go back further than through his post history but the point is made with less than the past 3 months)

Who knows, some of these might be valid sources or they could just be the media puppets of the Iranian regime.
What trouble do you have with Human Rights Watch or The Scotsman? Those are the sources he`s relied upon in this thread?

Don`t run away from dealing with these sources.
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
yes, gryfwad

what trouble do you have with Human Rights watch on Syria and Iran?

What trouble do you have with Human Rights Watch on Hamas?

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/06/09/isrlpa11106.htm

http://http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/01/29/isrlpa12543.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/03/24/palab15559.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/02/29/isrlpa18177.htm

Yes, fuckwad, What to you have against Human Rights Watch on Hezbollah?

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/10/05/lebano14336.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/08/29/lebano16763.htm

http://hrw.org/reports/2007/iopt0807/2.htm#_Toc173055035

According to HRW, not only did Hezbollah deliberately target civilians, they deliberately stored munitions in civilians homes (thereby attempting to use civilians as shields). These are the most serious Crimes against Humanity there are.
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
so scouser.1

Basically, you've surrendered. Fine by me. You've been shown to be a fraud. You couldn't resist putting up a fight against HRW links. It was like the most delicious bait to you.

Somehow, seeing that bait, you had to "broaden" the discussion to other nations. You don't do that when you see criticism of Israel of exactly the same sort, do you, my anti-semitic child? In fact, you'd never do that.

You have zero interest in being fair or being balanced. What you care about is being against Israel. You'll jump in on the stupidest anti-Israel thread and join in the pogrom. But if there is an anti-Iran or anti-Syria thread - oh no! Such a thread must be flawed!

Let me assure you I enjoyed breaking you on this thread, little one.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
TQM said:
what trouble do you have with Human Rights watch on Syria and Iran?

What trouble do you have with Human Rights Watch on Hamas?

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/06/09/isrlpa11106.htm

http://http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/01/29/isrlpa12543.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/03/24/palab15559.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/02/29/isrlpa18177.htm

Yes, fuckwad, What to you have against Human Rights Watch on Hezbollah?

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/10/05/lebano14336.htm

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/08/29/lebano16763.htm

http://hrw.org/reports/2007/iopt0807/2.htm#_Toc173055035

According to HRW, not only did Hezbollah deliberately target civilians, they deliberately stored munitions in civilians homes (thereby attempting to use civilians as shields). These are the most serious Crimes against Humanity there are.
Well, I've just taken a quick look at your Hezbollah links and nowhere does HRW report that they hid material within civilian homes, in fact it states:

"Many of the attacks in which civilians died took place at times when there was no evidence that Hezbollah fighters or weapons were in the vicinity, despite IDF claims that the high proportion of civilian deaths in Lebanon was due to Hezbollah hiding its rockets and fighters in villages and towns."

The one link that did mention what you claim was just an opinion piece.

But what it did confirm is that Israel located military installations beside civilians structures during the war...likely as a shield.

You need to read more when they let you out of therapy.
 
Toronto Escorts