George jr. just came on to give his State of the Union . I listened to 5 minutes and had to puke, and he hasn't even got to foreign policy. If he closes his speech with DA BEARS will win the super bowl next year I"ll SHIT GOLD BRICKS
While I don't follow Canadian Politics (the Liberals win all the elections correct?) the second PP is right on.Timberwolf said:Of course Jean did not dismantle the GST or the Free Trade agreement; they are just too damn good for the economy. He may be arrogant, condescending and corrupt, but he is not stupid. He used the negative feeling surrounding Mulroney to his advantage, lied to all of us and we keep putting him and his government into power. Exactly, who are the idiots in this country?
With respect to Bush and America. If oil was really the issue then the Americans, especially after the Persian Gulf war, would have seized control of the wells in Kuwait and Iraq, among other places. Fact is, if there is a war the price of oil will skyrocket, OPEC will be pissed and Bush will have gone a long way to gisenfranchising many countries. It is not in his best interests, politically speaking, to get into a war. Whatever happens, it is not about oil. Rather, it is about there being a direct threat to the well being of the United States. Historically, the United States has been isolationist in foreign policy, especially regarding war ( for which they have been negatively judged ). Cases in point, the korean Police Action and the Second World War. It was only after countries such as Japan and Germany either directly attacked or declared war on the Americans that the United States waged war. It is my view that Osama bin Laden did the world a favour. He directly attacked the Americans and made the the fight against terrorism America's War. The rest of the world, just like after the Second World War, will thank the Americans after the dust settles.
The Americans are thinking long term oil supply. They wanted a pipeline through Aphganistan to get Caspian Sea oil but the Russians outsmarted them, and secured the north as an ally.
With respect to Bush and America. If oil was really the issue then the Americans, especially after the Persian Gulf war, would have seized control of the wells in Kuwait and Iraq, among other places. Fact is, if there is a war the price of oil will skyrocket, OPEC will be pissed and Bush will have gone a long way to gisenfranchising many countries. It is not in his best interests, politically speaking, to get into a war.
Iraq is no threat to the US. They have no way of getting anything to the US. They would be hard pressed to get anything to Israel.
Whatever happens, it is not about oil. Rather, it is about there being a direct threat to the well being of the United States.
They are pretty much in isolation here, too. Only Great Britain supports the US, and why is a mystery. France, Germany, Canada and others have spoken out against the US.
Historically, the United States has been isolationist in foreign policy, especially regarding war ( for which they have been negatively judged ).
The rest of the world has been dealing with terrorism a long time. The solution is to address the motivation.
He directly attacked the Americans and made the the fight against terrorism America's War. The rest of the world, just like after the Second World War, will thank the Americans after the dust settles.
The oil and Turkey points all miss the target, the world is not so simple that one dimensional strategies work.Paul Waters said:
The Americans are thinking long term oil supply. They wanted a pipeline through Aphganistan to get Caspian Sea oil but the Russians outsmarted them, and secured the north as an ally.
Currently, they depend on Saudi Arabia. Daddy Bush couldn't risk upsetting the Arab world by grabbing the oil in either Iraq or Kuwait.
It is different this time. They are trying to get Turkey involved so Turkey will look like they are annexing the territory of the Kerds (and all the oil fields there) so the Americans secure their supply.
You are right that it is not in his best interests to get into a war, but........well.......he *is* a moron.
Iraq is no threat to the US. They have no way of getting anything to the US. They would be hard pressed to get anything to Israel.
They are pretty much in isolation here, too. Only Great Britain supports the US, and why is a mystery. France, Germany, Canada and others have spoken out against the US.
The rest of the world has been dealing with terrorism a long time. The solution is to address the motivation.
The Americans are in the process of destroying their ecomony and creating another terrible period of inflation due to the huge deficits they are running. The economics are the same as with the Vietnam war.
Sell stocks and bonds. Invest in real estate. Lock in your mortgage.
Don't count on it... should make for interesting CNN visuals tho...onthebottom said:
Vietnam lasted more than a decade, the shooting in Iraq will be over in less than a month.
Wow,Timberwolf said:I think the value, if any, in the post by Mr. Waters is that it demonstrates the horrible anti-American feelings in this country and elsewhere. Notice I did not say anti-American thinking for if people thought things through, anti-American ideology would not exist. While it is true that in the end it is important to understand the motivation of hatred and address that, what does the world do in the meantime? Unfortunately, it is still necessary to have the guts and determination to deal with bullies, whether on an international scale or domestic and personal.
Saying Iraq is not a direct threat to the U.S. and the world is like the naysayers of the time arguing that Hitler was not a threat to Europe. Who was it that said, "peace in our time" just before Sept. 1939? Enough said.
The U.S. provides more intelligence, opportunities, and aid, financial and otherwise, to Nations around the world than all the other industrialized countries combined. It has a history of being instrumental in increasing the quality of life for people around the globe, including Canadians. The Americans are not responsible for the toxic ideology which has infected other peoples' belief systems. To argue that they are and suggest that America "deserves what they get" or to try and rationalize the evil behaviour of others makes me sick to my stomach. It's bogus, nonsensical and irresponsible. The problem in the world is not the United States of America, it is the evil in the hearts of Man.
I lived and worked in the U.S. for many years and have many friends there. I like to think I know and understand how Americans think and feel. Even though I am not a U.S. citizen, I "feel" like one. You guys get a bum rap. I, for one, thank you every day.
Good point.Timberwolf said:About the point that Iraq cannot deliver anything to Isreal. Was it not in the Persian Gulf War that Iraq lobbed a couple dozen scud missiles into Isreal? Think for a moment if those missles had nuclear or chemical warheads.
Come to think of it, Isreal gets chewed up a lot for defending herself as well. What is that all about, other than antisemetic feelings? Among other times, the world was angry at Isreal in 1982 when it attacked Iraq and destroyed its nuclear facilities. The Iraqis were just too damn close to being able to deliver nuclear warheads into the heart of Isreal. The world owes Isreal much thanks for that action. It is bad over there but at least nuclear warheads are not flying around.





