If there is another Terrorsist attack

[assoholic]

by Al Quaeda, how can Bush possibly justify invadeing Iraq instead of hunting down Bin laden ?

 

[Drunken Master]

You couldn't have found a place for this in another thread?

 

[assoholic]

..I felt it was an important question.

 

[WoodPeckr]

Good idea DM,

No offence meant assoholic, but by deleting this thread and squeezing it into an existing thread we may avoid the wrath of Pops, who gets kind of touchy about all these Bush bashing threads..........

I agree it is an important question.

 

[Drunken Master]

..I felt it was an important question.

It certainly is, but I think we might be at fault - myself included - for turning the Lounge into an (albeit x-rated) version of Crossfire.

 

[assoholic]

..judeging by the number of views and responses I would say alot of people enjoy these threads. Also I would add will the American people hold him responsible if such an attack occurs.

 

[irlandais9000]

by Al Quaeda, how can Bush possibly justify invadeing Iraq instead of hunting down Bin laden ?

Well, he can't justify it, unless, of course, the President of the US was willing to lie. Hmmm, do you suppose that it is possible?

But seriously, if another attack happened, my guess is that Bush would say that his oppenents opposed giving him antiterrorist funding that he asked for, and therefore, his oppenents are responsible. It all would be a lie, of course, but George has never shied away from using tragedy for personal gain.