Impeach Bush

Mcluhan

New member
Feel the rage. http://impeachbushcoalition.blogspot.com/

I'm sure no one here agrees with my forecast, but here how I see it today, if the election were to be held tomorrow. popular vote 57% Dems, 37% R's, and the undecided sitting it out. Congress will be a landslide for the D's and I believe personally the shit-kicking will extend to the D's taking the Senate. IT CAN HAPPEN.

In the unlikely circumstance that impeachment proceeds, they have to get the Vice-President too. Can you imagine that evil son of a bitch in control? Even as the lame duck successor, he's too dangerous to be at the helm.
 

Gyaos

BOBA FETT
Aug 17, 2001
6,172
0
0
Heaven, definately Heaven
Mcluhan said:
In the unlikely circumstance that impeachment proceeds, they have to get the Vice-President too.
I don't think you'll have to worry about that. When the D's take over both House and Senate, watch for Cheney to suddenly resign (he will not want to face the brunt of those investigations as a sitting VP, rather take time off as a civilian. This includes Libby, oil execs in secret, illegal war profiteering, etc.).

Bush Jr. will then put in a "Gerald Ford" VP moron, Bush Jr. then will face impeachment or resignation. Otherwise, it will be President Murtha (when he takes over for Pelosi) if both Bush Jr. and Cheney fight it and get "fired" together. Like Nixon, Agnew took off, Ford in, Nixon out.

The press is mum about all of this, but if you can catch the words, this is the likely scenario, including Murtha to make a run for Speaker of the House.

Gyaos Baltar.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Again, you have to look at how many seats are safe and how many are contested. The number of contested seats has dropped considerably in the last few decades, for instance in 2004 there were only 27 House seats that were actually "in play". The dems would need a net gain of fifteen seats to take the house, very doable especially with the way events have been going of late. The Senate is going to be harder. Of the nine contested races, the Dems would have to win eight. It will be close, made easier by fools like Allen in Virginia who may well lose, but I don't think the Dems are quite going to do it. Regardless, unless some huge new scandal is revealed, George will not be successfully convicted by the Senate even if the House voted to impeach, which I doubt. Anyone want to put money on it let me know.

My prediction for the election based on how things stand today. Dems pick up 13 to 16 seats in the House, 6 in the Senate. We'll see how I do.
 

Cinema Face

New member
Mar 1, 2003
3,636
3
0
The Middle Kingdom
Asterix said:
My prediction for the election based on how things stand today. Dems pick up 13 to 16 seats in the House, 6 in the Senate. We'll see how I do.

Sounds about right.

Impeachment just ain't gonna happen.
 

Mcluhan

New member
Asterix said:
Again, you have to look at how many seats are safe and how many are contested. The number of contested seats has dropped considerably in the last few decades, for instance in 2004 there were only 27 House seats that were actually "in play". The dems would need a net gain of fifteen seats to take the house, very doable especially with the way events have been going of late. The Senate is going to be harder. Of the nine contested races, the Dems would have to win eight. It will be close, made easier by fools like Allen in Virginia who may well lose, but I don't think the Dems are quite going to do it. Regardless, unless some huge new scandal is revealed, George will not be successfully convicted by the Senate even if the House voted to impeach, which I doubt. Anyone want to put money on it let me know.

My prediction for the election based on how things stand today. Dems pick up 13 to 16 seats in the House, 6 in the Senate. We'll see how I do.
Asterix, if i were betting, i would watch the square your chips land on, and parle with you. I am just saying 'it can happen'. Obviously mine is a much more emotional driven statement. I WANT TO SEE IT HAPPEN.

As for impeachment, we have more scandals to come...wait and see. There's a young Woodward out there somewhere working on it now as we speak. there has to be. And if ever there was an occasion for another Deepthoat to surface, buddy this is it.
 

MarkII

New member
Sep 22, 2004
1,902
0
0
I will not enter in to this debate.

But, I will say I have staunchly refused to vist the US since George Jr was elected. I simply find the man to be a bufoon. And, it scares me to think who is really pullng the cords that move his lips.

This btw has not been easy as most of my clients are in the US.

As long as he's there...I'm not. However I'm not so sure I trust the American people to vote in someone better. My clients all feel that way too!

M2
 

Blake659

Banned
Mar 31, 2006
432
0
0
Without a doubt........

The Democrats will get in as next President.

Evidently they are self blessed with higher intelligence, so they should win the election handily. I certainly would bet on that happening. Any takers??

Then, with them in Power, the world will quiet down, become so much tamer, and the Islamic Fundamentalists will stop bothering everyone.

I am looking forward to the election and a Very Peaceful World under the Democrats!!!!
 

Mcluhan

New member
MarkII said:
I will not enter in to this debate.

But, I will say I have staunchly refused to vist the US since George Jr was elected. I simply find the man to be a bufoon. And, it scares me to think who is really pullng the cords that move his lips.

This btw has not been easy as most of my clients are in the US.

As long as he's there...I'm not. However I'm not so sure I trust the American people to vote in someone better. My clients all feel that way too!

M2
Ditto, and I'm in the same boat on the clients. I will add some interesting info to this after dinner..info that might startle some less involved in the crossboarder...muck and mire that you are problably experiencing also....standby for an addendum to your post.
 

Gyaos

BOBA FETT
Aug 17, 2001
6,172
0
0
Heaven, definately Heaven
Cinema Face said:
Sounds about right.
Impeachment just ain't gonna happen.
Until it happens. Dems pick up 23 in the House. House is D, Bush Jr. hearings will take place. Impeachment CAN happen. That doesn't mean Bush Jr. will be removed. The House votes to Impeach, the Senate hears the impeachment case. And we are talking EVERYTHING about Iraq coming out.

Gyaos.
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
Mcluhan said:
As for impeachment, we have more scandals to come...wait and see. There's a young Woodward out there somewhere working on it now as we speak. there has to be. And if ever there was an occasion for another Deepthoat to surface, buddy this is it.
Given the VP, would impeachment really lead to an improvement?
 

Mcluhan

New member
MarkII said:
I will not enter in to this debate.

But, I will say I have staunchly refused to vist the US since George Jr was elected. I simply find the man to be a bufoon. And, it scares me to think who is really pullng the cords that move his lips.

This btw has not been easy as most of my clients are in the US.

As long as he's there...I'm not. However I'm not so sure I trust the American people to vote in someone better. My clients all feel that way too!

M2
Here's what I have recently experienced. International bank wires have now increased from 1-to-2 days to 3-to-5 days. Up 2 days on average. And this is based on wires that wher the 'sender' and 'recipient' accounts are identical as say 6 months ago. Can you imaging the windfall in profits to the banking system? Well, actually the correspondant, which in most cases will be Bank Of America or bank of New York. We are talking here hundreds of millions in overnight interest just gained from the business of terror, and falling mainly into the coffers of three large banks. Surprised?

Next point. Western Union is now holding amounts over some minimum, which I have not discovered the threshold yet, but guess it to be amts over 1,000, until there is a special declaration which has several questions, including the nature of the business involved.

Time to start shipping ounces of gold via fedex. It would be much cheaper.

Next point: CANADA is flagged on Western Union's "Terrorist watch". They have us on this list because apparently a lot of money has been flowing in that direction, (so they say). I'm sure Poland is not on the same list. BTW, before you ask, this came from the mouth of a Western Union supervisor, head office, when I had a transaction hang, earlier this week. I was first dumbfounded, and then pissed off.

We are now being terrorised alright, but it ain't by Arabs. It's the fourth Reich. You'd better believe it. I just picked up two dead canaries off my floor this week.

Another indicator, inflation of premium located land values in Costa Rica is going off the scale...I mean really off the scale. Borderline stagflation condition. And it aint the middle class that's buying. Germans and Americans... they are securing not retirement, but security in the event of...
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
Mcluhan said:
Read the thread starter.
Sorry, I forgot about that by the time I got to the later post. I forget who is in line after the VP, (Secretary of State, maybe?) but given his administration is it anyone that would be better)
 

Mcluhan

New member
someone said:
Sorry, I forgot about that by the time I got to the later post. I forget who is in line after the VP, (Secretary of State, maybe?) but given his administration is it anyone that would be better)
House Speaker from San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi
 

someone

Active member
Jun 7, 2003
4,307
1
38
Earth
Mcluhan said:
House Speaker from San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi
I know nothing about her. I'm assuming that she can't be as bad but I would be interested in your opinion as you seem to me more informed on this issue then I am.
 

Mcluhan

New member
Addendum on bank wires

MarkII, you know why its taking the extra time, right? They are forcing the bank to document extra, and enter into the 4th Reichs Virgina DB..good thing memory is cheap these days.
 

Asterix

Sr. Member
Aug 6, 2002
10,025
0
0
Mcluhan said:
House Speaker from San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi
Well, no, she's not. Perhaps you're anticipating. After the VP, the fat, bloated current House Speaker Hastert is next in line, followed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate Ted Stevens, followed by the Secretary of State Condi Rice.
 

Mcluhan

New member
Asterix said:
Well, no, she's not. Perhaps you're anticipating. After the VP, the fat, bloated current House Speaker Hastert is next in line, followed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate Ted Stevens, followed by the Secretary of State Condi Rice.
yes, clearly anticipating...a prediction.
 
Toronto Escorts