Is woke the new racism? or as Advertised?

[escortsxxx]

Is woke the racism. What is adopted Policies That martin Luther king foghtt against.

Being colorblind I have a dream is Is considered racist by woke.
Add race Segregation has become good.
Jobs by race is good.
ect.

Canada’s only Africentric school was launched amid calls to better support Black youth. Ten years on, has it fulfilled its promise?

Toronto’s Africentric Alternative School was opened in 2009 to better support and engage Black students. To parents and educators, it promotes positive Black identity and a strong sense of community. But some believe more can be done.

www.thestar.com

On the other head Traditional racist hate woke. I'd rather not have school Segregation If the idea comes from the left.
Does a that make woke ok?

Teaching MLK With the Social Justice Standards

Too often, lesson plans surrounding Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy fail to move beyond “I Have a Dream.” These classroom suggestions acknowledge the depth and complexity of the movement he helped to lead.

www.learningforjustice.org

or is it a mixed bag Both racist and not racist views?

 

[silentkisser]

I don't think this is racist. Segregation is when a majority forces a minority to be excluded from schools or water fountains and what not. Plus, the black students are not being forced to attend a special school. The article discusses the reason why they launched the school...Black kids had a 40% dropout rate and were more likely to be expelled or suspended. Something needed to be done to try and help this community. The reality is that virtually every school in Ontario was designed with white kids in mind. The curriculum, until recently, focused on the successes of European nations and settlers with just a smidge of indigenous history and culture.

The issue is there is a cultural misunderstanding to some extent of how blacks are. As the article says, the kids felt like the had to censor themselves in other schools because they didn't want to be stereotyped as being "loud" or "ghetto."

Now, I will say this, I did not go to a school with a large number of POC. I mean, in my grade we had one black kid, one Indian, and a few Filipino, and it was a catholic board, so there were no other religions. I think it would have been better to have exposure to other ethnicities and religions because you can learn a lot about the world, and understand and appreciate different cultures.

As for the MLK stuff...We all know that certain people LOVE to quote one tiny fragment of one speech he gave, but never acknowledge the other stuff he talks about. The sad reality is that a certain segment of the population want to believe that everything is perfect when it comes to racism, but the reality is there is a LOT that needs to be addressed. In the US (and to a lesser extent here in Canada), laws have some inherently racist origins, or are implemented differently based on the race of the accused.

EDIT: As per the BS that MLKs colourblind speech is racist....That's not the issue. I think I can safely say for all Liberals that we would LOVE if that were the case. The issue is that its the only thing conservatives every quote, which they cherrypick only the parts they like. They don't talk about any of his other speeches, or his call for action, like saying white people who are angry about the treatment of blacks but do nothing to help are just as bad as the racists...MLK was saying at the time of his death that there was still a LONG road to go before the "I have a dream" speech would be reached.

Check this video out from MLK day on Monday:

 

[escortsxxx]

I don't think this is racist. Segregation is when a majority forces a minority to be excluded from schools or water fountains and what not. Plus, the black students are not being forced to attend a special school. The article discusses the reason why they launched the school...Black kids had a 40% dropout rate and were more likely to be expelled or suspended. Something needed to be done to try and help this community. The reality is that virtually every school in Ontario was designed with white kids in mind. The curriculum, until recently, focused on the successes of European nations and settlers with just a smidge of indigenous history and culture.

The issue is there is a cultural misunderstanding to some extent of how blacks are. As the article says, the kids felt like the had to censor themselves in other schools because they didn't want to be stereotyped as being "loud" or "ghetto."

Now, I will say this, I did not go to a school with a large number of POC. I mean, in my grade we had one black kid, one Indian, and a few Filipino, and it was a catholic board, so there were no other religions. I think it would have been better to have exposure to other ethnicities and religions because you can learn a lot about the world, and understand and appreciate different cultures.

As for the MLK stuff...We all know that certain people LOVE to quote one tiny fragment of one speech he gave, but never acknowledge the other stuff he talks about. The sad reality is that a certain segment of the population want to believe that everything is perfect when it comes to racism, but the reality is there is a LOT that needs to be addressed. In the US (and to a lesser extent here in Canada), laws have some inherently racist origins, or are implemented differently based on the race of the accused.

Buy that definition apartheid In South Africa or minority dictated to Majority was not segregation.
New definition on it's way...
No the old definition does not have such a differential.

Different but = It's not racist True. Having women only and men only Hospitals We're not necessarily be sexist. But Put a policy that makes white supremacist happy Is to be viewed with some Caution.

Generally under the old system of Liberalism And human rights theory Basics 1 access to service based only on your race Is what is called systematic racism. The alteration of the word equity has created a Hegelian dialectic.

 

[silentkisser]

Buy that definition apartheid In South Africa or minority dictated to Majority was not segregation.
New definition on it's way...
No the old definition does not have such a differential.

Different but = It's not racist True. Having women only and men only Hospitals We're not necessarily be sexist. But Put a policy that makes white supremacist happy Is to be viewed with some Caution.

Generally under the old system of Liberalism And human rights theory Basics 1 access to service based only on your race Is what is called systematic racism. The alteration of the word equity has created a Hegelian dialectic.

How is that policy making white supremacists happy? I mean, the only way they would be happy would be to have school boards for all the different races and religions. I mean, most white supremacists do not consider jews as white, so they wouldn't want them in a WASP school.

The difference between this is that this was an experiment to see if they could do better. I hope that there are lessons learned here that are implemented into the wider school board.

Now, I understand why some want to paint these schools as a racist institution, but the reality is that anyone can attend. They cannot stop a white student from going there. So, it isn't truly segregated in that sense.

I think you mean "Separate but equal" and it was the supreme court ruling that allowed segregation. Except that they were not equal. Black schools received significantly less funding than white schools, black communities got fewer services, and it was virtually impossible for black families to get mortgages or insurance. Forced integration in America schools continues to this day. A former roommate of mine lives in San Diego, and she was telling me that they had to fill out a form for schools that asked about the racial background. Basically, they have a quota for the number of races in each school. She is South Asian. But, if the closes school to them has too many south asians, her daughter would be bussed to another school that doesn't have that diversity. Now, that's a discussion for another thread, but I see how this can be obviously both good and bad.

 

[escortsxxx]

How is that policy making white supremacists happy? I mean, the only way they would be happy would be to have school boards for all the different races and religions. I mean, most white supremacists do not consider jews as white, so they wouldn't want them in a WASP school.

The difference between this is that this was an experiment to see if they could do better. I hope that there are lessons learned here that are implemented into the wider school board.

Now, I understand why some want to paint these schools as a racist institution, but the reality is that anyone can attend. They cannot stop a white student from going there. So, it isn't truly segregated in that sense.

I think you mean "Separate but equal" and it was the supreme court ruling that allowed segregation. Except that they were not equal. Black schools received significantly less funding than white schools, black communities got fewer services, and it was virtually impossible for black families to get mortgages or insurance. Forced integration in America schools continues to this day. A former roommate of mine lives in San Diego, and she was telling me that they had to fill out a form for schools that asked about the racial background. Basically, they have a quota for the number of races in each school. She is South Asian. But, if the closes school to them has too many south asians, her daughter would be bussed to another school that doesn't have that diversity. Now, that's a discussion for another thread, but I see how this can be obviously both good and bad.

I agree That in white supremacy Utopia They don't want schools for anyone but them. But they see it as a step by step process in the same way the game movement 1 from legslation to marriage. The biggest obstacle isThe mentality The people hang out together And see that they are human. Keeping people separate young age Volunteer or not Further this end. That's why so many Liberal groups Encourage intercultural events.

The leader of the KKK is on record as supporting this type of segregation. I'm sure it's not the typing once but it'll take when he gets.

I have any different Education standard The difference from mainstream Society and make sure that educated people from that school will not be able to easily get a job in mainstream society for further adding to the separation of the races.


It's unlikely Canadian schools will go full ebonics . But you are schools are the same type of And it's a matter of degree only. Speaking and ready in ebonics Is a clear disadvantage.

1 can only look at the criticism of my posts for my grammar mistakes To see how minor small differences I have such a negative Impact.

Sure planning about grammar might be racist but it's the way it is.

Of course The schools might exceed The popular standard and also cover this standard. Am I case black students rise to the top of society As they have done in many areas including politics.

Even this helps the whites Supremacist however. Hitler used this success of 1 group over the others to create 1 of the greatest disasters of the 20 century.

If people are separated a youth on artificial divisions Those divisions Become real in the mind of the Children.

 

[poker]

How many straw men can one board build?

 

[Valcazar]

How many straw men can one board build?

All of them, poker.