Joe Jackson's uses his son's death to plug new label

calloway

Active member
Feb 25, 2003
13,473
1
38
Luv Natural Redheads
He didn't look too upset at the BET awards last night either.

He abused Michael when he was alive and now continues even after his death.

It has always been about money, greed and fame for Michael's father... one of the many reasons his kid was so screwed up in the first place.
 
It is pretty unbearable to see him on the BET awards last night. He did not look in grief over his son death at all. Only person was truly effect out of the family is Janet Jackson. The father was all about himself and you can see that he loved the attention and it was like he was back in the day of the Jackson 5.

I really feel sorry for the kids. All I can see why the grandmother and grandfather want custody, because of the potential millions the kids will be getting from their father future estate. Now that is if he had a recent will done in the last few years for them. I could be wrong and the grandmother really want to take care of her grand kids but my gut feeling is that it is only about money for them.
 

babyfinsta

Well-known member
Jul 2, 2005
2,369
29
48
On top of yo mama!
Mao Tse Tongue said:
Sometimes even I am amazed.

Talking to CNN's Don Lemon, Michael's father is obviously in deep grief, as he takes time to plug his new record label just days after Michael's death.

Wow.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/
Joe jackson is pure scum. nuff said.
 

2k5

Banned
Apr 10, 2005
596
1
0
why not make a little money over your dead son
makin money is more important than wasting time grieving
 

calloway

Active member
Feb 25, 2003
13,473
1
38
Luv Natural Redheads
This might be the best news all week.

DAD CUT OUT OF JACKSON'S WILL: REPORT

A will drafted by Michael Jackson in 2002 which divides the singer's estate among his mother, three children and one or more charities could play a central role in determining how his tangled financial relationships will be unwound.
 

Jade4u

It's been good to know ya
I hope the childrens Mother gets custody of the children. I think for one the children only wish to live there because it is a much bigger luxurious house than what thier Mother lives in. They're young and therefore think they would be better off in a larger estate rather than a caring home. Let's face it money is not everything but love is. By looking at the whole picture I think the mother would be the most caring out of the two options and she has even said she would take the child that is not hers. I hope the judge can see this too and not think that the best home is the wealthiest home. As long as they are provided for is all that matters and not used to gain more fame.
 

Jade4u

It's been good to know ya
asn said:
she's not their mother. according to reports she was a surrogate. and are you kidding about the mother being caring. she has stated she wants nothing to do with them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deborah_Jeanne_Rowe By this I believe they are more hers than his. http://www.nndb.com/people/848/000095563/ I am still trying to find the one where she stated she would like custody and said she would even take the one in which the mother is not known. Found it. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...-wife-Debbie-Rowe-wants-custody-children.html
 

Jade4u

It's been good to know ya

healer677

Dos XX at Senor Frogs
Jan 13, 2004
2,154
0
36
Playa Del Carmen Q.R.
The whole family is messed up. Starting from the father down. I just hope to God MJ's "kids" don't grow up all screwy. But chances are -they will.
 

Toke

Just less active
Oct 14, 2002
2,716
119
63
Just a couple of quick things:

- The children should not go with Ms. Rowe. She has never been a 'mother' to them, so what makes her better the K. Jackson now?

- Yes, Joe is scum.

- Personally, I kinda always wondered about the kids lineage. For someone who is biologically dark-skinned, his kids were really light. (Just my opinion)

- This will get messy, but hopefully the courts will quickly step in and make this as painless as possible for the kids.
 

LKD

Active member
Aug 6, 2006
5,064
10
38
JEFF247 said:
He hangs with "the Reverend Al Sharpton". nuff said.
and Jesse Jackson too... they call themselves Reverend and go around making babies the don't even know about left and right.
 

The LoLRus

Well-known member
Mar 30, 2009
2,269
136
63
Toke said:
Just a couple of quick things:

- The children should not go with Ms. Rowe. She has never been a 'mother' to them, so what makes her better the K. Jackson now?
But if the kids go with grandma Jackson there's a conflict of age issue, she could croak at any time also.
Can you imagine an 80-year old woman having to deal with 3 teenagers??!!!
 

LKD

Active member
Aug 6, 2006
5,064
10
38
Toke said:
Just a couple of quick things:

- The children should not go with Ms. Rowe. She has never been a 'mother' to them, so what makes her better the K. Jackson now?

- Yes, Joe is scum.

- Personally, I kinda always wondered about the kids lineage. For someone who is biologically dark-skinned, his kids were really light. (Just my opinion)

- This will get messy, but hopefully the courts will quickly step in and make this as painless as possible for the kids.
one thing I'll agree is, the kids shouldn't be anywhere near Joe Jackson. Katherine Jackson is in her 80's, and from the way she moves around, who know's how much longer she'll be around for the children. The children have already suffered a great loss from Michael's death. It would be another blow if they get attached to Katherine and suffer another loss in case she dies. Ms. Rowe is the biological mother of two of the children so she'd likely take care of them as her own child. I doubt she doesn't have any feelings whatsoever for them. Its just unfortunate that Michael wanted no part of her in the kids lives and probably made a deal/paid her off. I also have a feeling Katherine Jackson is jumping on to get custody of the children for other reasons like Michael's estate rather than for the good of the children.
 

Toke

Just less active
Oct 14, 2002
2,716
119
63
The LoLRus said:
But if the kids go with grandma Jackson there's a conflict of age issue, she could croak at any time also.
Can you imagine an 80-year old woman having to deal with 3 teenagers??!!!
True, but what's the alternative. (I'm sure there are many, but for Ms. Rowe to step in now would be a farce IMHO)
 

Toke

Just less active
Oct 14, 2002
2,716
119
63
LKD said:
one thing I'll agree is, the kids shouldn't be anywhere near Joe Jackson. Katherine Jackson is in her 80's, and from the way she moves around, who know's how much longer she'll be around for the children. Ms. Rowe is the biological mother of two of the children so she'd likely take care of them as her own child. I doubt she doesn't have any feelings whatsoever for them. Its just unfortunate that Michael wanted no part of her in the kids lives and probably made a deal/paid her off. I also have a feeling Katherine Jackson is jumping on to get custody of the children for other reasons like Michael's estate rather than for the good of the children.
If she wanted to be there, she would have fought it in courts.

If she was paid off; more reason for them not to be raised by her. She sold them!!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts