Blondie Massage Spa

Jordan Peterson's moldy house has almost killed him.

Intrinsic

Well-known member
Jul 21, 2012
948
422
63
The grift is like most Repug/righties claiming they are Christian just like the head 🤡 pretends to be.
Trump will say anything to be liked, he needs and craves the attention. How old are you by the way, "repug"? Stop being so cranky, you remind me of my Uncle, it's a lot healthier to hate less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaulGoodman777

YoYoHoward

Well-known member
Oct 3, 2024
179
315
63
He went to Russia to get treated for akathisia..Which he developed after he terminated a prescription benzodiazepine, clonazepam...
I don’t think that’s the sequence, or at least not according to Grok. Regardless he was in a coma in Russia, at least according to what he told Rogan afterwords. Even for Rogan it was a bizarre health choice.

For some reason these guys often think they know more than actual doctors, who have spent a decade studying medicine.

Love Rogan but the man is an uneducated moron. I still think Peterson is a brilliant psychologist. Just no fucking idea about medicine.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
23,998
19,394
113
Trump will say anything to be liked, he needs and craves the attention. How old are you by the way, "repug"? Stop being so cranky, you remind me of my Uncle, it's a lot healthier to hate less.
Yeah, I'm old, sure, bud, whatever turns your crank. LOL

Would you rather I call them Reptillians??

How old are you bud, 2012, I'm guessing 50ish maybe 60ish for you???
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
30,047
61,255
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Lets try this one more time.
Coming to a Christian vs Atheist debate, and then refusing to call yourself Christian, all to pander to the right in a clout chasing endeavour, is grifting.
Once again...He's never once to my knowledge ever claimed to be a Christian and he didn't in this case.

So where's the grift on his part?...How does he gain by not saying that he is a Christian..Actually it's just the opposite...The hard core Christian fundamentalists were upset with him for not embracing Christianity here and in the past.

The grift as you would call it was done by Jubilee by framing this as something it was not for clicks.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,666
8,267
113
Once again...He's never once to my knowledge ever claimed to be a Christian and he didn't in this case.

So where's the grift on his part?...How does he gain by not saying that he is a Christian..Actually it's just the opposite...The hard core Christian fundamentalists were upset with him for not embracing Christianity here and in the past.

The grift as you would call it was done by Jubilee by framing this as something it was not for clicks.
No the debate was pitched as 1 Christian vs 20 Atheists, and it was uploaded as such.
Then subsequently changed.
Why would a non-Christian come to represent a Christian and then claim to not be one, when the debate didn't go his way?
Grifting.
Also watch his debate with Matt Dillahunty. I dont think JP recovered from that humiliation till date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
30,047
61,255
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
No the debate was pitched as 1 Christian vs 20 Atheists, and it was uploaded as such.
Then subsequently changed.
Why would a non-Christian come to represent a Christian and then claim to not be one, when the debate
How do you know that he came on to represent a Christian?...Don't tell me because that was the original title of the video either...That was Jubilee's doing to drive clicks.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
23,998
19,394
113
You have no way of knowing under what pretense he agreed to do this video...You're only speculating.
The young man who really pissed off JP stated how it was pitched to him when he signed up. Do you not believe the same pitch would have been made to the grifting slimeball?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
674
973
93
How do you know that he came on to represent a Christian?...Don't tell me because that was the original title of the video either...That was Jubilee's doing to drive clicks.

He believes in a literal Jesus Christ, and a literal Abrahamic God.

Per 1 John 5:1, that makes him a Christian.

However, you are starting to identify the grift: Say a lot of things, but don't commit to anything. Therefore you can maintain your position as an intellectual (It's not meaningless word salad, you're just too stupid to understand) without alienating any portion of your audience.

Here's a 3 hour video of him being intellectually dishonest, contradicting his own positions, and generally lying about his expertise:

 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
30,047
61,255
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
The young man who really pissed off JP stated how it was pitched to him when he signed up. Do you not believe the same pitch would have been made to the grifting slimeball?
Since I don't accept the premise that he is a grifting slime ball your question is moot.
 

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
674
973
93
Since I don't accept the premise that he is a grifting slime ball your question is moot.
Very Peterson of you.

"I have been confronted with facts that don't fit my worldview, therefore I reject your premise, because I've decided words don't mean anything."

 

buckstarbuck

Member
Jun 9, 2025
23
26
13
I took his course at U of T about 15 years ago, before he got famous (and took up permanent residence in crazytown), and can assure everyone who reads this that his grift goes back decades. Examples:

1) He assigned his own textbook (Maps of Meaning) as required reading for the course. Not that unusual in academia, sure, but he would also get a few dozen copies of his book from the publisher, at cost, and bring them into the classroom on a skid to sell them to students, for cash. Retail price. Acted like he was doing us a favour.

2) He charged students to access an "online platform" to complete the required assignments, which were the same assignments he did every year. In previous years, he distributed a Word document via email and had everyone fill in the appropriate sections. Same assignment, just more expensive.

3) The actual assignments for the class were: a) a past autobiography of about 15 pages, divided into the 7 "epochs" of your life; b) a future autobiography of where you see yourself down the road; and c) a very easy multiple-choice exam, drawn entirely from his lectures and book. Half the questions had one-word answers, and it was all graded by Scantron bubbles.

4) Neither he nor his incredibly incompetent TA did any actual grading work. The first two assignments were all peer-evaluated - they literally did nothing except anonymize them and send them out to other students - and the multiple choice exam was so simple that the class AVERAGE was an A-. This was a 4th-year psychology course.

5) His "lectures" - during which he wore an obnoxious white-and-red robe, from his Harvard teaching days - were often rambling and poorly-sourced linkages between different myths and religious tenets, which he then obliquely linked to modern psychology. He would often (mis)quote the Bible, and seemed unable to adjust to the fact that all the students had access to google, and could therefore fact-check him in real time; he was questioned on several occasions about claims he made that were factually incorrect and would always change the subject. he rarely, if ever, cited sources, and spoke with such an inflated sense of self-assuredness that he couldn't even comprehend how he might ever be questioned on his views.

5 ctd.) His "lectures" often consisted of analyzing religious themes in films, and he spent the entirety of two full lectures analyzing - I shit you not - Disney's Pinocchio. There were 12 lectures in the semester, and I'm pretty sure he missed at least two of them. For this, the man was paid a mid-six-figure salary by U of T.

The man never espoused an original or groundbreaking thought during the entire semester. He did, of course, rail against any cause he disregarded, including (but not limited to) feminist critiques of the Bible, political correctness, Marxism, "Facebook-Friend lifestyles", and of course the breakdown of social structure vis-a-vis the end of traditional family values. He also had a habit of pausing for 5-10 seconds with his fingers against his temple, scowling down at the ground as if collecting his thoughts for some insight he was preparing to share... and then pivoting into a bizarre rant about something entirely unrelated to the previous topic.

This man is decidedly not a genius. He is, however, a gifted orator, with a loud enough voice and small enough sense of humility to feel comfortable saying anything that comes into his mind, in a way that impresses those who don't look too far beneath the surface of his words. From a far enough distance, he can be mistaken for an intellectual; the closer you get, the more obvious it becomes that he's no more than a narcissistic charlatan in a fancy robe.

Sources: my course notes, which I still have saved on an old external hard drive.
The mic drop
Was the debater there when Peterson was pitched the concept?

ask the debater?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
30,047
61,255
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Very Peterson of you.

"I have been confronted with facts that don't fit my worldview, therefore I reject your premise, because I've decided words don't mean anything."

Speaking of facts...How about you change the title of this thread since it is clearly incorrect. It was his in fathers house that he was exposed to mold when cleaning it out after he passed. Not his house which he recently sold in Toronto.I know though, don't let the facts stand in the way of a good story th right?

DECADES of mold exposure, moved into the house in 1999.

Don't get a home inspection. Consult an experienced engineer before buying anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaulGoodman777

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
674
973
93
Speaking of facts...How about you change the title of this thread since it is clearly incorrect. It was his in fathers house that he was exposed to mold when cleaning it out after he passed. Not his house which he recently sold in Toronto.
What do you mean by "change"? What do you mean by "incorrect"?


She explained how her 62-year-old dad had been dealing with a “host of neurological issues this summer that we believe stem from CIRS, which is chronic inflammatory response syndrome, due to decades of mould exposure.”
He (jordan peterson) has been dealing with a "host of ... issues ... due to decades of mould exposure". i.e.: He has been exposed to mould for a long time. He moved into his wet-basement Toronto house in 1999. 2025-1999 = 26. 26/10 = 2.6 decades. If we accept the premise that a "decade" is 10 earth-years, and we accept that "earth" is the planet we currently occupy, and "year" is the time it takes the planet earth to complete 1 orbit of the sun. I mean, if we believe (i.e. are willing to die for) the fact that the earth orbits the sun. Don't even get me started on proving the sun exists.

Fuller added that he had been suffering from symptoms of neuropathy and weakness for the last few years and his condition worsened after Peterson cleaned out his late father’s basement earlier this year.
He (jordan peterson) has been suffering from this condition "for the last few years" (i.e., before 2025). The condition was "worsened" (made worse) when he cleaned out his basement "earlier" (before the current moment) "this year". This year being 2025.

I know Petersonian's don't believe in an objective truth, but hopefully I've broken it down enough to show that his mold exposure corelates pretty strongly with his ownership (and presumably occupancy) of his Toronto home.
 
Toronto Escorts