Asian Sexy Babe

Mammograms Could Cause Breast Cancer

marikiss

Member
Feb 21, 2008
562
0
16
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2448822/mammograms_could_cause_breast_cancer.html

Research Suggests Radiation May Put High-Risk Women at Even Higher Risk
The very test that was designed to detect breast cancer may actually cause breast cancer in high risk young women, a study presented this week at the Radiology Society of North America (RSNA) suggests. These preliminary
Mammograms Could Cause Breast Cancer in High-Risk Young Women, Study Warns
Date: December 1, 2009
Chicago, IL
United States of America findings put women who have the so-called "breast cancer gene" or a family history of breast cancer in a pickle about whether to get the early or frequent mammograms many doctors recommend.

A Dutch epidemiologist told medical experts at the radiology conference, "For women at high risk for breast cancer, screening is very important, but a careful approach should be taken when considering mammography for screening young women, particularly under age 30." The researcher, Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide, Ph.D., from the Department of Epidemiology and Radiology at University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands, warned doctors, "Further, repeated exposure to low-dose radiation should be avoided."

Ideally, young women at high risk for breast cancer will avail themselves of safer screening methods that do not involve exposure to potentially cancer causing radiation. Such methods could include sonograms and MRIs, tests which are currently performed in addition to--not instead of--mammograms.

The study findings were presented at the annual radiology conference in Chicago not even a month after a government task force's recommendation to discontinue routine mammograms for all women between the ages of 40 and 49 stirred up controversy and confusion among millions of women. The government panel advised women to discuss the benefits and risks of regular mammogram screenings for breast cancer with their health care providers instead of blanketly
 
Last edited:

Medman52

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2009
1,417
166
63
I think the title of your thread should include the words : "may" and "could"
 

marikiss

Member
Feb 21, 2008
562
0
16
learned something

Thanks, had no clue I could edit thread titles.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,750
3
0
This is rather like the 'five people a year are trapped in their car by the seat belt and burn to death therefore it is much safer not to wear seat belts' argument.
 

Medman52

Well-known member
Sep 9, 2009
1,417
166
63
This is rather like the 'five people a year are trapped in their car by the seat belt and burn to death therefore it is much safer not to wear seat belts' argument.
Yup, totally agree...wonder what the ratio of women "saved" by a Mammogram is to women "harmed" by Mammogram.
(Maybe I should just STFU and leave this thread to the girls)
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
It's old news that the use of any type of x-ray and it other bigger badder brothers, the CT, PET, and MRI, MAY cause start the ball rolling, but it's very rare and the benefits of these procedures outweigh the threats by a country mile. No news here.

You should not use X-ray for every little thing and the amount of radiation used in it's bigger siblings would make you shake your head and sometime medical people consider this when multiple CT's and such are required.
 
Toronto Escorts