More conservative idiots

[TOVisitor]

For those of you not aware, conservapedia is the wingnuts' answer to the "liberal" wikipedia.

Let's look at the entry on kangaroos:

"Like all modern animals . . . kangaroos are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah's Ark prior to the Great Flood."

You may not recognize the word "baramin." It's a 20th-century creationist neologism that refers to the species God placed on earth during Creation Week. Special for kids: I wouldn't use that word on the biology final. Although maybe your parents could sue the local school board for failing to teach the Book of Genesis in science class.

More on Conserva-kangaroos (and this is just hysterical beyond belief):

"After the Flood, these kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia. There is debate whether this migration happened over land with lower sea levels during the post-flood ice age, or before the supercontinent of Pangea broke apart, or if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters."

Now think about that.

If they migrated over land, why is it that none of them liked to stay someplace along the way? ALL Of them went to Australia?

But the over-water journey really gets me.

Can you imagine two kangaroos floating along on "mats of vegetation" making a several thousand mile journey across the ocean to Australia?

Makes one wonder if these two baramin were some kind of brilliant kangaroo species that managed to paddle their way, taking along enough provisions or at least fishing for food on their journey, all the while navigating by the stars to Australia.

Maybe some 700 Club version of Disney could make a feature length cartoon about this.

And these people want to run the USA??? No thanks.

Boggles the mind.

 

[papasmerf]

Tov


you need to cut back on that kool-aid

 

[danmand]

I have many more questions:

How did Noah keep the animals from eating each other on the Ark? Remember, he did not have modern fencing material, the ark was made out of roughed out wood, and I understand it was built in quite a hurry by Noah and other unskilled laborers. I would not trust the snakes to leave the small mammals alone during a lond sea voyage.

What did Noah feed the animals anyway? I am especially curious about the carnivores, what did they eat, if not some of their prey animals?

Did he only bring one male and one female of all species? What about the animals where the male has a harem of females?

 

[frasier]

I have many more questions:

How did Noah keep the animals from eating each other on the Ark? Remember, he did not have modern fencing material, the ark was made out of roughed out wood, and I understand it was built in quite a hurry by Noah and other unskilled laborers. I would not trust the snakes to leave the small mammals alone during a lond sea voyage.

What did Noah feed the animals anyway? I am especially curious about the carnivores, what did they eat, if not some of their prey animals?

Did he only bring one male and one female of all species? What about the animals where the male has a harem of females?

Here is your answer....follow the link..

http://www.evanalmighty.com/

 

[basketcase]

... I would not trust the snakes to leave the small mammals alone during a lond sea voyage. ...

And said Noah to the sky, "there are snakes that knew their mothers on this mother knowing ark."

 

[danmand]

But did he have rinos and elephants and camels?

He'd have to have an aircraft carrier with accompanying
fleet.

Imagining the requisite supply of provisions is existential.

And how did he separate the warthogs that were food for
the lions from the warthog couple that were passengers?
ANd the mice that were food for the snakes? I think there
were a lot of conflicts on the old ark. I am surprised the
small mammalls did not stage a riot.

 

[lookingforitallthetime]

When the Arc is a rockin, don't bother knockin.