Newpaper featuring 15 Vagina Pics pulled

[Fromspace]

This newspaper will be a collectors' items in the year's ahead, if you manage to get a hold of a copy of this Australian student rag.

http://www.ecanadanow.com/world/201...-sydney-newspaper-shows-vaginas-cover-pulled/

 

[nobody123]

Student papers are to newspapers what my blog about cats is to 60 Minutes.

 

[ducttape]

This newspaper will be a collectors' items in the year's ahead, if you manage to get a hold of a copy of this Australian student rag.

http://www.ecanadanow.com/world/201...-sydney-newspaper-shows-vaginas-cover-pulled/

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images...aba5b-9817-4f3d-aa01-186328b83072-296x420.png

Dibs on 2, 12 (minus the lint) and 13.

 

[james t kirk]

They are more accurately vulvas, not vaginas.

But bottom left looks nice.

 

[djk]

Mon dieu.

 

[mandrill]

Those must be the ugliest pussies in Australia.

 

[nobody123]

Does no one else find it even a tad ironic that what was intended to be a statement of protest over the objectification of women (pussies come in all shapes and sizes, not only hairless thin-vulva'd pornstar models) is now being debated and - worse - rated! online by men who pay for sex?

 

[gibsomstreet]

Does no one else find it even a tad ironic that what was intended to be a statement of protest over the objectification of women (pussies come in all shapes and sizes, not only hairless thin-vulva'd pornstar models) is now being debated and - worse - rated! online by men who pay for sex?

 

[Smallcock]

They prefer unshaven down under?

 

[fuji]

They prefer unshaven down under?

The pics were taken in the women's center on campus. Just be glad you didn't see the armpit edition!

 

[WoodPeckr]

Those must be the ugliest pussies in Australia.

Perhaps that's why they are unshaven, to hide them better.....:eyebrows:

 

[gibsomstreet]

They prefer unshaven down under?

Or among university-class civilians.

There's a reason why they're called *private* parts, bucko. Unfortunately, all too many TERBites have been spoiled silly by overexposure to what are, in effect, *public* parts.

 

[mandrill]

Does no one else find it even a tad ironic that what was intended to be a statement of protest over the objectification of women (pussies come in all shapes and sizes, not only hairless thin-vulva'd pornstar models) is now being debated and - worse - rated! online by men who pay for sex?

But these are not even averagely ugly pussies. That would make the point. In fact, I have not seen pussies this ugly in 30 years of pooning.

What would people say if there was a photospread of ghastly shit-ugly dicks with deformed knobs?

 

[nobody123]

But these are not even averagely ugly pussies. That would make the point. In fact, I have not seen pussies this ugly in 30 years of pooning

Then I submit that you need to get out more, or stop categorizing wanking to porn as "pooning".

 

[GPIDEAL]

Those must be the ugliest pussies in Australia.

LMAO (probably!)

 

[mandrill]

Then I submit that you need to get out more, or stop categorizing wanking to porn as "pooning".

I do. I have seen at least 500 pussies in the flesh (and labia and in the past, usually fur) in over 30 years of getting it. NONE were that ugly.

Those pussies are perversely ugly. It's as if I photographed the fattest, ugliest, crudest dudes I could find and posted them and complained that women always try to go with good-looking guys in nice suits who drive Ferraris and that this is unfair because ugly, obese joes who work minimum wage jobs as shit-house cleaners need love too.

 

[gibsomstreet]

Then I submit that you need to get out more, or stop categorizing wanking to porn as "pooning".

How many of the "500 pussies in the flesh" oagre's witnessed have been civilian, I'd like to know. (Or, how many of those civilians actually *looked* civilian.).

Look: in its diversity, this is what real university-student-type women look like. Yeah, a lot of it is "ugly"; and all the more so photographically disembodied from their possessors. You can even sense paunch in a few cases. And...so what. It's reality: like it or lump it. And yes: a lot of men would be tempted to "hit that", regardless--predatorily, or just in the name of sexual egalitarianism (for them, there's nothing worse than to be martyr to stifling "perfection"). Or just because they adore the person who possesses said apparatus--they're students, after all. Smart chix. A lot of men like smart chix. As I've said before, there are men who'll opt for a Lena Dunham over a Paulina Gretzky, anyday.

And if oagre thinks it's disgusting, I'm sure that as regards the possessors, the feelings would be mutual.

 

[gibsomstreet]

Oh, and may I add: at least it's just "ugly". Now, if any of them had weird oozy substances or obvious signs of untreated genital infections. *then* I'd be concerned. (Though I didn't look close enough to tell.)

 

[las venganza]

That bottom left one reminds me of an mpa I have seen lol. I love pussy so much who cares what it looks like!!!:eyebrows:

 

[CapitalGuy]

I'm sorry, but are dudes in a prostitute review forum actually ragging on other dudes for talking about pictures of womens' pussies as though said raggers are somehow more civilized/cultured/respectful of women, than the guys who are commenting on said pictures of womens' pussies? Gents, I would politely suggest that your mere membership here on TERB, lumps you in with the rest of us. Society in general would certainly have that view!! Welcome to the bottom.