PVR Alert: JFK | The Smoking Gun
- Thread starter GPIDEAL
- Start date
You do realize the theory put forward is accidental discharge, not the conspiracy theory you promote in the other thread right?
Not accidental but friendly fire but why do they conclude there was a cover up if it was an accident?
Though he puts together a reasonable case, I have a hard time accepting the repercussions.
If it was accidental, why would they have covered it up? If it was intentional, how could they have managed to cover something up that would have to be witnessed too by many to be hidden?
If it was accidental, why would they have covered it up? If it was intentional, how could they have managed to cover something up that would have to be witnessed too by many to be hidden?
In an interview with Huffington Post Live, Stone repeated the claim that the tape had been tampered with.
The Zapruder film wasn’t aired on network television until 1975, nearly 13 years after the assassination.
Although there were numerous eyewitnesses to the JFK assassination itself, many of them died under mysterious circumstances.
Between the winters of 1963 and 1967, 15 JFK assassination witnesses who’d been interviewed by the Warren Commission, Dallas Police, or the FBI died prematurely and in bizarre ways.
When an actuary calculated the odds of this occurring naturally, it came out at one hundred thousand trillion to one (100,000,000,000,000,000 to 1).
Expressing his amazement that some people still deny that there was a wider conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK, Stone explained how it was impossible for Kennedy to have been shot from only one direction.
“You see him essentially get a hit from the front, when he gets the hit from the front which is the 4th or the 5th or the 6th shot, he goes back and to the left, that’s the basic evidence,” said Stone, adding that many eyewitnesses at the hospital saw “a massive exit wound to the rear of his skull” but that the autopsy was manipulated because the doctors in charge had being ordered to patch up the back of Kennedy’s head by the military to hide the evidence.
Stone also touched upon the so-called “magic bullet” theory, presented by the Warren Commission, which attempted to explain how a single bullet could have caused seven different wounds in two people.
“It’s a farce and they got away with it because it’s a lot of mumbo jumbo,” said Stone, asserting that at least five shots were made. According to the official narrative, Lee Harvey Oswald only took three shots from the Texas Book Depository.
In addition, expert marksmen who have attempted to replicate Oswald’s shot, at a moving target through a tree, have failed to do so.
“Two teams of FBI experts tried to do it, plus CBS I believe and various other organizations, have tried to simulate that shooting in less than six seconds – it’s not possible,” said Stone, adding that there had to be at least one shooter from the front.
I didn't promote a theory but a fact.
I didn't know at the time of my original post what this show was about, but your wrong again basketcase. The conspiracy here is the cover-up by the Secret Service, including the admission by Jerry Custer, x-ray technician that he was told to tape a 6.5mm fragment to the skull to make it look like a shot from the Mannlicher-Carcano (which confirms the theory Dr. David Mantik's, Physicist and Radiologist, that the X-Ray has been doctored)
You obviously didn't watch this show.
The work by Howard Donohue is commendable, and yes, there's evidence that JFK was shot with a frangible bullet.
However, the X-Rays show that the particle cloud is towards the rear of the skull meaning a shot from the front, not the rear by a SSA.
There's also the film by Charles Bronson (not the actor) which has been analyzed and the conclusion is that SSA Hickey did not have an unobstructed view of JFK. Check this out also for movement in other windows (proving conspiracy but I wouldn't say three windows, only two).
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xevrsv_jfk-assassination-films-charles-bro_news
The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded that there's movement of the boxes in the sniper's lair and other windows AFTER Oswald allegedly left the sixth floor.
You prefer fiction over truth. You believe that your country is without sin and is only about truth, justice and the American way. You blindly ignore evidence that points to conspiracy.
Generally I agree with Stone. However, I think there's also been some embellishment by certain conspiracy theorists of the strange deaths and other points which makes serious researchers who are pro-conspiracy look bad.
I don't believe in the SSA accident theory but the cover-up was for many other reasons. Generally-speaking, the cover-up is separate from the murder conspiracy and not part of a grand conspiracy which I don't believe in btw either.
