Review: Rachel @ Pickering Angels

[Auron]

Recently had a chance to see Rachel at PA.

http://www.pickeringangels.com/angel_rachel.htm

I wandered into Pickering angels recently without having reserved with anyone, kinda wanting a surprise, and Rachel was that surprise.

She entered, and first thing I noticed was that she had a darker complexion than her picture showed, but that her face was very pretty. Her body was thin (which I like - if I wanted meat there is always the Mrs...). I immediately liked her personality and she struck me as intellegent, though I tried not to get too chatty as I find friendly chatting kills the sex drive.

Her massage was great, she loosened me up like an RMT, she's oddly strong for someone so petite. I opted for the nude reverse, and her body felt solid and natural. Her breasts aren't huge but they are real and I prefer that. I'm more of an ass-man and hers was solid.

The flip was expertly done. Her technique was very good, imagine heavenly waves of warm pleasure steadily pumping your rod. I didn't stand a chance and the release was satisfying.

Overall I'd recommend if you like thin girls with a great attitude.

Face: 8
Body: 7 (I like thin)
Sexiness: 6
Service: 8
Repeat: yes

 

[mishi]

THanks for the review Auron; I think I'll have to pay her a visit.

 

[mahmoud]

Recently had a chance to see Rachel at PA.

http://www.pickeringangels.com/angel_rachel.htm

I wandered into Pickering angels recently without having reserved with anyone, kinda wanting a surprise, and Rachel was that surprise.

She entered, and first thing I noticed was that she had a darker complexion than her picture showed, but that her face was very pretty. Her body was thin (which I like - if I wanted meat there is always the Mrs...). I immediately liked her personality and she struck me as intellegent, though I tried not to get too chatty as I find friendly chatting kills the sex drive.

Her massage was great, she loosened me up like an RMT, she's oddly strong for someone so petite. I opted for the nude reverse, and her body felt solid and natural. Her breasts aren't huge but they are real and I prefer that. I'm more of an ass-man and hers was solid.

The flip was expertly done. Her technique was very good, imagine heavenly waves of warm pleasure steadily pumping your rod. I didn't stand a chance and the release was satisfying.

Overall I'd recommend if you like thin girls with a great attitude.

Face: 8
Body: 7 (I like thin)
Sexiness: 6
Service: 8
Repeat: yes

everything you say is great but then only give 6 in sexiness?

and i guess her body isnt great if body is 7, whats the ass out of 10 or compared to others at PA?

 

[dirkd101]

Nice review Auron.

 

[bobstar123]

Disagreed

Auron, I don't mean to step on your toes or to say that my opinion is better, but to every man his own. I will give my review on your thread, just so it can be in one place.

Anyways I also walked in the Pickering Angels without appointment, I like the surprise of not knowing who is walk thought the door. Got showed to the room, took my shower and in walks Rachel. My first though was "score" she is hot. She starts with the usually "Have you been here before, which massage are you going with?" I picked the NR. She asks me to get on the table and starts the massage clothed. So she massages me for like 10mins, staying just out of my touch. She asks for the flip and I say "I sort of wanted to massage you". Off comes the clothes and I think again hot. I start to massage her and she isn't into it at all, she looks like she doesn't want to be there so I think lets just great it over with. I get back on the table no front massage no tease it was just grab and go. After the finish she puts a hot towel on me and walks off, I showered again and was out of there total time 20mins.

My closing points, I don't need alot of conversation but I a little is good. I don't expect the girls to be 100% into what she is doing but at least make a customer feel you want to be there.

Face:8
Body:8.5
Service:3.5
Repeat: No

 

[Auron]

everything you say is great but then only give 6 in sexiness?

and i guess her body isnt great if body is 7, whats the ass out of 10 or compared to others at PA?

I rated her down on sexiness for the same reason as bobstar123 pointed out... but it wasn't as bad his experience. Sorry to hear about that Bob, if she did that to me I'd post about it as well. She seemed talkative about non-sexual subjects and that kinda dropped her sexiness factor. Her ass is nice no doubt, maybe 8/10 and it was certainly nice to put my hands on it. Her real seller though is that she's pretty.

I think it's good to have multiple opinions and posting in the same thread was a good idea bobstar123. To be fair I did go back to PA two more times that trip and saw different people (Kyla and Luna), and I would rate them Luna > Rachel > Kyla.