Royal Spa

SW called escort by Toronto PD

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
Cool, about high time......maybe now the public will understand it should not matter if she is in a hotel room or in a car..she is an escort.

Here is the story I'm talking about.......http://www.torontosun.com/2011/05/17/man-charged-in-hooker-attack

Toronto Police detectives believe there may be sex trade workers who were attacked and forcibly confined by a john.

Police said a 22-year-old woman working in the Gerrard-Jarvis Sts. area was picked up by a man driving a white Honda Civic around 1:30 a.m. Sunday.

The man drove to a downtown parking lot where the woman was assaulted and threatened.

Det. Paul Gauthier said the assailant kept her in the vehicle “against her will.” He said the victim was not seriously injured.

“Based on the behaviour and the picking up of the escort, there’s reason to believe she’s not necessarily the first,” Gauthier said.
“There may very well could be other victims out there, as well.”

Mubashar Abbasi, 23, of Brampton, is charged with forcible confinement, threatening death and two counts of assault.
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,139
1
0
Detroit, USA
Sadly the Sun still feels the need to call her a hooker
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,474
12
38
Sorry Joe, it doesn't change the fact that there is a distinction.
Perhaps you might enlighten us; to me a sex-worker is a service provider is an escort. And none of them is a criminal because of that occupation.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
Perhaps you might enlighten us; to me a sex-worker is a service provider is an escort. And none of them is a criminal because of that occupation.
One of them is in violation of Canadian law and the other is not, however, that was not my major point. To describe the typical S.W. as being the same in looks, education, outlook on life, addiction or lack of problems as an independent escort is naïve.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,474
12
38
Thanks, but my understanding is that when someone sells sex, only an 'inmate of a bawdyhouse' is a criminal; that a streetwalker is only afoul of the law if and when she's 'communicating for the purpose' (or making an indecent public spectacle), and that no form of prostitution itself is against the laws of Canada. So exactly which of the three 'popular' usages is teh one that violates Canadian law?
 
Toronto Escorts