Lol this was a review yesterday by one of the "top posters"
"I'm not getting into the glory details that happened behind closed doors with us two, as Maria is a classy lady and time spent was beautiful"
Like wtf lol. How does this help us at all? Was booking easy? What services were offered? Was it mechanical? Rushed? Like fjekajajajsjdjsjdk
Well obviously to me at least..
Booking was easy, otherwise there would be a mention of it
If things were rushed or mechanical, one would not be so glowing in the review.
As for services, I am guessing some sort of coitus was involved.
Pictures were accurate, or again there would be some mention.
About the only thing such a review doesn't tell you is if there was greek [I'd assume not unless mentioned] and if any BJ was covered or not. I don't really need to know the various positions of coitus unless she said no to one of them.
The only problem I'd have with the above review is that it sounds a bit white knightish/pussy whipped and I would question if there is something being hidden.
To me, this would be the perfect review for an outcall that went well.
"Saw Kate, had coitus, everything fine"
Perhaps a mention if the person isn't into the BBBJ or the DFK because I'd assume us unless otherwise mentioned. Perhaps a mention if her face looked like someone known if there are no face pics. Actually it wouldn't be a bad idea for a reviewer to put in the sig the typical services that one seeks.
If an outcall didn't go well.
Saw Kate. Wanted to have coitus but "she" had a penis. Hard to book. Pictures were of someone 20 years younger and a different race. 200 pounds heavier than advertised. Also a mean beast of a "woman?" Said "she" would only do gloved hand job despite advertised list of services. Did not partake [see penis reference]