The Business of High-end Prostitution
- Thread starter friendz4evr
- Start date
C
crystalpalace
So how much is Melissa Francis' rates? How about that fat Korean girl that works at CNBC? What are her rates? What 'bout that hispanic girl anchor? And that British bimbo that wears the leather? And that chick from Singapore? ALL THESE CNBC ANCHORS gotta go out on the night and get a clit hard-on too, don't they? What are their rates?
I'll bet you, CNBC will get it wrong again. LOL. I'm off to Sanzanka soon.
Gyaos Baltar.
I'll bet you, CNBC will get it wrong again. LOL. I'm off to Sanzanka soon.
Gyaos Baltar.
I like it when the media was talking about Mr Spizter and were saying he didn't like how most the ladies would go to the Concierge Desk to pick up the guy's hotel room key. That way she could walk in the room without knocking on the hotel room door like a guest would.
I could just see myself going to the concierge desk and telling them when a 5'5" gal with blond hair ask for room xxxx give her my room key
I could just see myself going to the concierge desk and telling them when a 5'5" gal with blond hair ask for room xxxx give her my room key
Did anyone else watch it? I watch it and notice a high end sp website from montreal on the show. I think it was sensual cleo as well as yours truely. it was interesting to watch without a lot of focus on stigma attached to business. Mostly about high end escort and what kind of experience they bring to client and that is a booming business despite the economy. former sp and author veronica monet gave interview as well as tracey qwan who wrote book Diary of Manhatten call girl. They also talk about review board, its purpose and how the internet make it easy for businessman to make date with high end call girl and how they book date.
E
enduser1
"Natalie" McLennan is now back in Montreal, I figure that is the reason they picked Montreal.
Also, I feel that they didn't touch on the really high end, or why the high prices. I mean ultimately, what is the difference between a girl in Toronto who is reasonably good looking at $250.00 per hour and one who costs a thousand? The answer is damn little.
Those high end girls who goes for $50,000.00 a weekend are selling exclusivity. A woman like that is not going to be seeing ten guys in a week like a $250.00 escort, or 10 guys in a day like a $120.00 a half hour escort. (any guy who thinks a $120.00 half hour girl is not seeing at least five guys a day is nuts BTW)
What makes Natalie Mc Lennan or Morgan Van Lief or Raquel special is that they are not just a hole into which a male jams his cock. I felt that the show did not really "jam that point home", LOL
These women take time to dress themselves and present themselves. They invest in esthetics and seduction of the man they are with. $120.00 won't get you that. $120.00 will get a girl to take your money strip, hold her nose and bob on your knob for twenty minutes. Then you get dressed and leave.
EU
Also, I feel that they didn't touch on the really high end, or why the high prices. I mean ultimately, what is the difference between a girl in Toronto who is reasonably good looking at $250.00 per hour and one who costs a thousand? The answer is damn little.
Those high end girls who goes for $50,000.00 a weekend are selling exclusivity. A woman like that is not going to be seeing ten guys in a week like a $250.00 escort, or 10 guys in a day like a $120.00 a half hour escort. (any guy who thinks a $120.00 half hour girl is not seeing at least five guys a day is nuts BTW)
What makes Natalie Mc Lennan or Morgan Van Lief or Raquel special is that they are not just a hole into which a male jams his cock. I felt that the show did not really "jam that point home", LOL
These women take time to dress themselves and present themselves. They invest in esthetics and seduction of the man they are with. $120.00 won't get you that. $120.00 will get a girl to take your money strip, hold her nose and bob on your knob for twenty minutes. Then you get dressed and leave.
EU
I thought they covered that quite well. Whereas the $250/hr call girl is pretty much expected to just provide an hour's worth of erotic entertainment, the thousand dollar one is expected to be able to converse on an equal level with her client and provide that sense of connection one would normally expect from a partner. As well, they're expected to be able to mingle in the high-end social crowd and not be out of place.enduser1 said:
That's what I took from it, anyway.
One thing in the program bothered me in particular. When a high-end client wants to see an SP, they're expected to fill out all sorts of personal detail. One of the interviewees - I forget which one - said that if she didn't get all the information she needed, she'd call the prospective client's office.
I understand the need for security and personal safety of the girls, but to call a client's office number is, I think, over the line.
i dunno how sophisticated these high-priced ladies are but i would gather that a fair number of the mid-priced ladies a la mirage, cupids, exquisite, etc... given that you've seen them a few times and have developed a rapport, can provide this level of companionship in an extended seesion (evening, multiple days)enduser1 said:
i figure if i see a mid-priced girl say 4 times to develop rapport, that's $1,000. assuming we click and we go on an extended evening date, $1,000 + $500 expenses totalling $1,500. do that say 4 times again, $6,000. then do an extended weekend or whole week getaway. even if factoring gifts, travel, entertainment expenses you're still ahead compared to what the high-end ladies charge. and remember their rates don't include incidentals!
and how can a guy really be sure that he clicks with any of these high-end girls with several emails. i have in mind some ladies (you know who you are if you're tracking my posts) that i would love to do the aforementioned, if i had the money.
perhaps i'm missing sth i'm not aware of
Wait, wait, wait. Now just hold on a second here. Let me understand something. You mean that you can pay these woman and they will have sex with you? Wow, this is like Pulitzer prize material! I mean to uncover that such a service even existed is simply remarkable. How does CNBC do it? Maybe they can find out why it is suddenly getting colder now and all the leaves are falling off the trees. Is this some form of cosmic radiation causing this? I really am getting worried.
pahenduser1 said:
Your just buying into the bull shit being fed to you. There are plenty of 120/hh girls that will show you an awesome time. These high end girls are no better and you are getting the same amount of uncertainty you get with any other girl. The only thing thats for sure is you will pay much much more money.
Pass
E
enduser1
koxinga said:
No I don't think you are missing something. Morgan Van Lief is $350.00 per hour Raquel is $500.00 with a minimum 3 hr booking and Natalie is retired, allegedly.
I did point out in my post that there is not much difference between a $250 and a 1,000.00 girl. But if a girl is charging high amounts chances are that she is not seeing that many guys. Whereas the $120.00 hr girls are.
EU
I don't know if I buy into this theory that they see less guys. Say a $250 girl who is willing to see 4 guys a day suddenly realizes that she is really in demand and can now charge $5000 a throw. Is this girl now going to suddenly be happy only seeing two guys a day and leaving $10,000 on the table? Given that humans tend to be greedy, I really don't buy this argument in any practical sense.
Also, if this logic holds are you really safer with a higher priced girl? If she is seeing the same number of guys, and seeing guys who can afford $5,000 a throw, isn't she seeing clients who can and probably do hobby more often and are therefore inherently more risky clients? I don't have any answers for this, just some food for thought.
Also, if this logic holds are you really safer with a higher priced girl? If she is seeing the same number of guys, and seeing guys who can afford $5,000 a throw, isn't she seeing clients who can and probably do hobby more often and are therefore inherently more risky clients? I don't have any answers for this, just some food for thought.
Strongbeau said:
And that market is shrinking by the second. The Billionaires are now Millionaires, and the Millionaires are now just upper class and so on...
I totally agree with SB, and makes sense.
