Toronto Star: Hacker prank sends SWAT team to innocent B.C. family’s home

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1031978--hacker-sends-swat-team-to-b-c-family-s-home?bn=1

Coco the dog was barking inside Louise Gray’s house Monday afternoon — and he wouldn’t stop.

He only does that when someone’s in the yard, so the Langley, B.C., homemaker and mother of two went to the door and opened it.

“I went outside, and I had all the guns and the SWAT team pointing at me, telling me to go to the end of the road and to keep my hands up,” she said.

Eighteen police cars had been dispatched to their home.

“I said, ‘I’m a housewife. My kids are inside,’” Gray said. Police denied her request to go get them, trundling her into a police car and saying they would telephone 16-year-old Eric, who was still asleep, and Daniella, 18, who was browsing Facebook. Moments later, the two came out with their hands raised and their pockets turned out.

Less than two hours later, the ordeal — instigated by a hacker thousands of kilometres away — was over. “It was surreal,” says Gray.

The Internet hoax known as “swatting,” where a SWAT team gets a fake 911 call and turns up on the doorstep of an unsuspecting homeowner, has moved north from the United States.

Gray’s family may well be the first victims of this common U.S. prank after a 911 call was routed through the family’s home computer, leading RCMP to believe a man had killed several people at the home, and was holding others hostage.

“It’s really frightening stuff,” OPP Commissioner Chris Lewis told the Toronto Star, adding he has yet to hear about anything similar in Ontario.

“It’s scary with the voice over Internet Protocol stuff ... where you can make a call look like it is coming from somewhere it’s not,” he said.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, swatting refers to falsely reporting an emergency to a police department to cause a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) response to a specific address.

“If someone is identified we will do everything in our power to put charges forward. Making a false report to police is a serious thing. It did tie up a lot of resources ... that could have been used elsewhere if there was a (real) emergency,” Const. Jillian Roberts of the Langley RCMP told the Star.

Roberts said the call was traced back to a cellphone number in California.

Gray told the Star that a hacker has been harassing her son and the rest of the family for over a year, using Eric’s email account to send viruses and pornography to friends, family and teachers at his school. The hacker even posted Gray’s husband’s name, address and phone number online, making it look as if he is an abortion doctor. He is actually a longshoreman.

The family approached police three times about the hacker, but nothing was resolved. “The police basically said, ‘Don’t go on the computer.’ I said, well that’s not very realistic. Everything is done on there, the kid’s homework is done on there,” Gray said.

After police realized that Monday’s hostage threat was a hoax, Gray asked them to come in and take all the computers, hoping the incident would put an end to the hacker’s tyranny. Gray says she’s frustrated, but glad the police are finally taking the problem seriously.

Chester Wisniewski, senior security adviser with the IT security company Sophos, said this 911 hoax exploits a security shortcoming with voice-over-Internet (VoIP) phone services that let people mask their true location.

Wisniewski said since VoIP services rely on street addresses provided by customers, someone can sign up for a service using the address of a victim they want to target with their hoax.

“Originally you couldn’t use 911 services with a VoIP phone, but then the government (both in Canada and the United States) forced the Internet phone companies to have people register an address,” he told the Star.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation says a 19-year-old Washington state man was charged last year after pretending to be calling from the home of a married California couple, saying the husband had just shot and killed someone.

“A local SWAT team arrived on the scene, and the husband, who had been asleep in his home with his wife and two young children, heard something and went outside to investigate after first stopping in the kitchen to pick up a knife. What he found was a group of SWAT assault rifles aimed directly at him. Fortunately, the situation didn’t escalate, and no one was injured,” the FBI states.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
One wonders if God forbid someone was killed as a result of this stupidity if the "hacker" could be prosecuted for manslaughter, and sucessfully sued civily for wrongful death?
 

Babypowder

Active member
Oct 28, 2007
1,869
0
36
One wonders if God forbid someone was killed as a result of this stupidity if the "hacker" could be prosecuted for manslaughter, and sucessfully sued civily for wrongful death?
no that would be the stupidity of the swat team for killing an innocent not the hacker
 

jgagent

New member
Jul 6, 2011
10
0
0
I read about this in the Star today. The article reads how the parents complained to the police multiple times about his sons computer being hacked and the police did nothing. Then in the article it states "this is a waste of their (police) time. Maybe they (police) should have done something when there help was requested.
This could have turned out so much worse for everyone involved.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
no that would be the stupidity of the swat team for killing an innocent not the hacker
There is more to it than that and it is an interesting question. Certainly there is a good chance of being convicted of reckless conduct, "Hacker" recklessly created a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to another person, which save for his action would not have occured the instrumentality of the injury was the SWAT Team.

Further "Hacker" seemingly would be an accomplice for Manslaughter in that they recklessnessly or with criminal negligence (sufficient for the commission of the crime) caused an innocent person to act. Certainly there seems to be reckless indifference, or criminal negligence as to the value of human life.

I haven't checked this against the CCC but if they are doing this other places as well. . . .
 
Last edited:

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,374
118,267
113
Same thing happened to me in the mid 80's. A "prankster" was phoning in fake 911 calls about burglaries and kidnappings and the cops help my gf and me at gunpoint for a couple of minutes until they were sure it was a hoax.
 
Toronto Escorts