CupidS Escorts

update - former OH GOP chair and GOP speaker sentenced to 20 years in $60M bribery case

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,240
104,535
113
Warrantless arrests in California
Stephen Miller’s tirade against judges this week stemmed largely from an order by U.S. District Judge Jennifer Thurston, a California-based jurist who found that the Border Patrol was overstepping its legal authority to conduct warrantless arrests and stops. Thurston found that agents had failed to meet the legal requirements for conducting such detentions — particularly a requirement that they have reasonable suspicion that someone they stop is in the country illegally — and ordered that they comply more stringently.

Refugee admissions
When Trump sought to pause the admission of all refugees, a judge ruled the effort was illegal. A federal appeals court blocked a portion of the judge’s ruling but still required the administration to continue processing refugees approved for admission prior to Trump’s term.

Redefining birthright citizenship
Perhaps Trump’s most brazen immigration policy was his attempt, through an executive order on his first day back in office, to narrow the centuries-old understanding of the Constitution’s guarantee of citizenship to those born on U.S. soil. Three district judges in three different courts immediately and resoundingly rejected Trump’s order. Now, the Supreme Court is preparing to weigh whether those judges — each of whom blocked the policy nationwide — overstepped their authority and should have issued more limited rulings.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,240
104,535
113
Judge blocks Trump executive order targeting elite law firm, a blow to his retribution campaign


WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday permanently blocked a White House executive order targeting an elite law firm, dealing a setback to President Donald Trump’s campaign of retribution against the legal profession.

U.S. District Beryl Howell said the executive order against the firm of Perkins Coie amounted to “unconstitutional retaliation” as she ordered that it be nullified and that the Trump administration halt any enforcement of it.


“No American President," Howell wrote in her 102-page order, "has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: ‘The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.’”

The ruling was most definitive rejection to date of Trump's spate of similarly worded executive orders against some of the country's most elite law firms, part of a broader effort by the president to reshape American civil society by targeting perceived adversaries in hopes of extracting concessions from them and bending them to his will. Several of the firms singled out for sanction have either done legal work that Trump has opposed, or currently have or previously had associations with prosecutors who at one point investigated the president.


The edicts have ordered that the security clearances of attorneys at the targeted firms be suspended, that federal contracts be terminated and that their employees be barred from federal buildings. The punished law firms have called the executive orders an affront to the legal system and at odds with the foundational principle that lawyers should be free to represent whomever they'd like without fear of government reprisal.

In the case of Perkins Coie, the White House cited its representation of Democrat Hillary Clinton’s campaign during the 2016 presidential race. Trump has also railed against one of the firm's former lawyers, Marc Elias, who engaged the services of an opposition research firm that in turn hired a former British spy who produced files of research examining potential ties between Trump and Russia. Elias left the firm 2021.



In her opinion, Howell wrote that Perkins Coie was targeted because the firm “expressed support for employment policies the President does not like, represented clients the President does not like, represented clients seeking litigation results the President does not like, and represented clients challenging some of the President’s actions, which he also does not like.”

“That,” she wrote, “is unconstitutional retaliation and viewpoint discrimination, plain and simple.”

The decision was not surprising given that Howell had earlier temporarily blocked multiple provisions of the order and had expressed deep misgivings about the edict at a more recent hearing, when she grilled a Justice Department lawyer who was tasked with justifying it. Her ruling Friday permanently bars enforcement of the executive order. She also directed Attorney General Pam Bondi and Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, to provide copies of her opinion to all government departments and agencies that had previously received the executive order.


The other law firms that have challenged orders against them —WilmerHale, Jenner & Block and Susman Godfrey — have succeeded in at least temporarily blocking the orders. '

But other major firms have sought to avert orders by preemptively reaching settlements that require them, among other things, to collectively dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars in free legal services in support of causes the Trump administration says it supports.

Eric Tucker, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,240
104,535
113
Judge gives Trump lesson in US history as action hammered as illegal for second time


A federal judge in New York found President Donald Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act was unlawful, Just Security legal analyst Adam Klasfeld reported Tuesday.

According to the ruling, the judge said that there's no “war,” “invasion” or “predatory incursion" — all have which Trump has suggested justify his use of the act to deport people without due process.


Trump alleged that he must use the AEA because there was "the greatest invasion in history" by immigrants into the U.S. In particular. Trump alleged that there was an influx of international gang members.

Want more breaking political news? Click for the latest headlines at Raw Story.

ALSO READ: Trump's armed thugs deliberately crushed this American family. Furious yet?


In a brutal decision, Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein began by giving Trump's represenatives a history lesson.

"This nation was founded on the 'self-evident' truths 'that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, [and] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,'" he wrote.

"Our Constitution embodies these truths, in a limited government of enumerated powers, in its system of checks and balances separating the executive, legislative and judicial branches, and in its guarantee that neither citizen nor alien be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."



He continued: "Yet, in March 2025, more than 200 aliens were removed from this country to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (“CECOT'), with faint hope of process or return. The sweep for removal is ongoing, extending to the litigants in this case and others, thwarted only by order of this and other federal courts."

At the end of April, a federal judge in Colorado made "preliminary findings that the AEA didn't apply, but the final ruling on that is pending," Klasfeld recalled in a post on Bluesky.

Read the full ruling here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,240
104,535
113
Court upholds racketeering convictions of ex-Ohio House speaker and lobbyist in $60M bribery scheme


COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A federal appeals court upheld the racketeering convictions of former Ohio House Speaker Larry Householder and an ex-lobbyist on Tuesday in a $60 million bribery scandal described as the largest corruption scheme in state history.

The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Cincinnati represented a win for the Department of Justice, which had secured the convictions in March 2023 after a yearslong investigation. Householder, a Republican, was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and lobbyist and former Ohio Republican Party chair Matt Borges was sentenced to five years in prison.


FILE - Ohio Republican Party Chairman Matt Borges participates in a question-and-answer session in Columbus, Ohio, Feb. 11, 2016. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins, File)

FILE - Ohio Republican Party Chairman Matt Borges participates in a question-and-answer session in Columbus, Ohio, Feb. 11, 2016. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins, File)© The Associated Press
Acting U.S. Attorney Kelly A. Norris said the appeals panel’s unanimous decision “affirmed the strength of the government’s evidence, the correctness of the jury instructions, and the fairness of the proceeding.”

Householder was convicted of masterminding a $60 million bribery scheme funded by Akron-based FirstEnergy Corp. to elect allies, secure power, pass a $1 billion bailout of two of its affiliated nuclear plants and then defend the bill, known as House Bill 6, from a repeal effort.



Prosecutors had described Borges’ primary role in the scheme as working to thwart a ballot campaign aimed at repealing the tainted legislation. Specifically, he was accused of paying $15,000 to someone who was helping spearhead the effort in order to get inside information. The referendum ultimately failed to make the ballot.

Scott Pullins, a long-time legal and personal adviser to Householder, called it a “sad and disappointing day” for both men and their families and supporters, and “even a sadder day for constitutional free speech and the rule of law.”

He said in a Substack post that Householder "raised undisclosed, unlimited donations for a 501c4 organization that supported him and his political allies” — just as speakers before and after him have done. “But the federal government singled only Mr. Householder out for prosecution.”

Householder and Borges each have a couple long shot legal options remaining: They could ask for a review by the full Sixth Circuit, or seek what’s known as certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping for consideration by the nation’s highest bench. Both types of requests are rarely granted.



Messages seeking comment were left for their criminal defense attorneys.

Householder's appeal failed on all six claims he brought in hopes of a reprieve. He alleged erroneous jury instructions, insufficient and inadmissible evidence, violations of his right to counsel, judicial bias and that his sentence was unreasonable for the circumstances.

The 65-year-old Householder argued that the government was wrong in describing what he had engaged in as a bribery scheme. Instead, he cast the money that flowed from FirstEnergy into a network of secret dark money accounts that he controlled as legal campaign contributions. Federal prosecutors charged that the money was given to Householder in exchange for the passage of House Bill 6, providing the necessary quid pro quo to make his conduct illegal.

Householder had also faulted U.S. District Judge Timothy Black in his appeal, asserting that he failed to properly instruct the jury that an agreement is necessary to prove bribery and that Householder needed to have agreed he would take action “on a specific and focused question or matter” at the time that agreement was struck.


The judicial panel said all of his claims failed.

Borges’ appeal hinged on three technical points of law. All failed, as well.

However, Circuit Judge Amul Thapar wrote in a concurring opinion that each of Borges' contentions “raises tricky and unresolved issues in honest services fraud jurisprudence.”

“And here, Borges has a good argument his conduct fell within a murky middle: perhaps objectionable, but not clearly illegal,” he wrote. “Until the Supreme Court revises its caselaw, however, we must follow its precedent.”

___

Bruce Shipkowski contributed to this report from Toms River, N.J.

Julie Carr Smyth, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,240
104,535
113
Appeals court makes no immediate decision in detention cases of two university students


A federal appeals court made no immediate decisions Tuesday as it considered jurisdictional issues in the cases of a Turkish Tufts University student who has been detained by immigration authorities for six weeks and a Palestinian student at Columbia University who was recently released from detention.



A judicial panel of the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New York, heard motions filed by the U.S. Justice Department regarding Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi. The department is appealing decisions made by two federal judges in Vermont.

The Justice Department says Ozturk should not be brought to Vermont from a Louisiana detention center and that Mahdawi should be detained once again. It also wants to consolidate the students' cases, saying they present similar legal questions.

Immigration court proceedings for Ozturk and Mahdawi are being conducted separately.

A district court judge in Vermont had ordered that Ozturk, a 30-year-old doctoral student, be brought to the state by May 1 for hearings to determine whether she was illegally detained. Ozturk’s lawyers say her detention violates her constitutional rights, including free speech and due process.


Protesters hold up signs outside court as a federal appeals court is scheduled to hear arguments in the cases of a Turkish Tufts University student who has been detained by immigration authorities for six weeks and a Palestinian student at Columbia University who was recently released from detention on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 in New York. (AP Photo/David Martin)

Protesters hold up signs outside court as a federal appeals court is scheduled to hear arguments in the cases of a Turkish Tufts University student who has been detained by immigration authorities for six weeks and a Palestinian student at Columbia University who was recently released from detention on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 in New York. (AP Photo/David Martin)© The Associated Press
“She’s a cherished member of the Tufts community,” Esha Bhandari, one of Ozturk's lawyers told reporters after the hearing. "She wants to finish her Ph.D. She’s scheduled to teach a class this summer. She should be released. Then the legal arguments can be dealt with.”


Mohsen Mahdawi speaks outside the courthouse after a judge released the Palestinian student activist on Wednesday, April 30, 2025 in Burlington, Vt. (AP Photo/Amanda Swinhart)

Mohsen Mahdawi speaks outside the courthouse after a judge released the Palestinian student activist on Wednesday, April 30, 2025 in Burlington, Vt. (AP Photo/Amanda Swinhart)© The Associated Press
The appeals court paused that order last week in order to consider the government's motion arguing the immigration court in Louisiana has jurisdiction over Ozturk's case, not the court in Vermont.

Immigration officials surrounded Ozturk as she walked along a street in a Boston suburb March 25 and drove her to New Hampshire and Vermont before putting her on a plane to the detention center in Basile, Louisiana.



Ozturk’s lawyers first filed a petition on her behalf in Massachusetts, but they did not know where she was and were unable to speak to her until more than 24 hours after she was detained. A Massachusetts judge later transferred the case to Vermont.

During Tuesday's hearing, the judges questioned Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign on why the government did not tell Ozturk's lawyers where she was sooner. He cited “operational security concerns.”

They also questioned him over what the government said was Ozturk's inability to name the “immediate custodian" in her plea for release, the person who has direct control and responsibility for someone who is detained. Ozturk's lawyers named Patricia Hyde, Boston-based ICE enforcement and removal field office director.


FILE - Protesters gather outside federal court during a hearing for Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University doctoral student from Turkey who was detained by immigration authorities, April 3, 2025, in Boston. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi, File)

FILE - Protesters gather outside federal court during a hearing for Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University doctoral student from Turkey who was detained by immigration authorities, April 3, 2025, in Boston. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi, File)© The Associated Press
Ensign said it should have been the warden of the Vermont jail, even though Ozturk was in transit there at the time.

Ozturk was “seized by people who are not in uniform and who were masked and hooded,” Judge Susan Carney said. “And to all outward appearances, they could have been private actors.”



Ozturk was one of four students who wrote an op-ed in the campus newspaper, The Tufts Daily, last year criticizing the university’s response to student activists demanding that Tufts “acknowledge the Palestinian genocide,” disclose its investments and divest from companies with ties to Israel.

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in March, without providing evidence, that investigations found that Ozturk engaged in activities in support of Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist group.

The government is also challenging another judge's decision to release Mahdawi from detention in Vermont on April 30. Mahdawi led protests at Columbia University against Israel's war in Gaza. He was arrested by immigration officials during an interview about finalizing his U.S. citizenship.

The judges questioned Ensign's arguments, asking him if an adverse decision is “irreparable harm" to the government.


“Sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn't, it depends on how right the government feels it is?” Judge Carney asked. Ensign argued that in the immigration context, the decision was “sovereign injury,” hurting the government's ability to carry out removals.

Judge Barrington Parker Jr. also asked Ensign if the government contests that the speech in Ozturk and Mahdawi's cases was protected speech. Ensign said the government has not taken a position on that.

Mahdawi, 34, has been a legal permanent resident for 10 years. He was in a Vermont state prison since April 14. In his release order, U.S. District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said Mahdawi has raised a “substantial claim that the government arrested him to stifle speech with which it disagrees.”

Mahdawi’s release allows him to travel outside his home state of Vermont and attend graduation next month in New York. He recently completed coursework at Columbia and planned to begin a master’s degree program there in the fall.

Kathy Mccormack, The Associated Press
 
Toronto Escorts