Asia Studios Massage

update - Trump cuts $37.5M in grants when Atlanta airport refuses to discontinue DEI policies

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
14,556
8,973
113
When facts don't fit the narrative, just alter the facts. lmao.
The vanished study opened with: “Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
101,353
28,467
113
I don't see the word "all graduates" or "all" either. ;)

People who have had formal education in basic philosophy and argumentation are not likely to use absolute statements in making political arguments. It would show they are unable to make their point intelligently. Or they are engaging in hyperbole. Which is as easily dismissed.

Plenty can be implied. I think the word you are looking for is 'proven'. Or causation, rather than correlation.

Nothing wrong with hard working Grade 10 dropouts, I respect everyone. But I find there is a direct correlation to education and political leaning.
That becomes very apparent seeing the trump Tylenol presser. You have to be a total idiot to think he hand RFK jr have any clue.
They both come across as total idiots but the base will still eat it all up.

 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore $500 million in federal grant funding that it froze at the University of California, Los Angeles.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction on Monday, saying the government likely violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires specific procedures and explanations for federal funding cuts. Instead, the government informed UCLA in generalized form letters that multiple grants from various agencies were being suspended but offered no specific details.


more

In August, UCLA announced that the Trump administration had suspended $584 million in federal grants over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action.

Lin issued a ruling later that month that resulted in $81 million in grants from the National Science Foundation being restored to UCLA. She ruled that those cuts had violated a June preliminary injunction where she ordered the National Science Foundation to restore dozens of grants that it had terminated at the University of California, which operates 10 campuses across the state.

The White House did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press requesting comment on Monday's ruling.

The Trump administration has used its control of federal funding to push for reforms at elite colleges that the president decries as overrun by liberalism and antisemitism. The administration also has launched investigations into diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying they discriminate against white and Asian American students.



more

Two Ivy League institutions, Columbia and Brown, struck deals to preserve funding that was held up by the Trump administration over similar claims that they had not done enough to respond to campus antisemitism.

In the case of Harvard, which pushed back with a lawsuit over cuts to its funding, a federal judge in early September ruled the funding freeze amounted to illegal retaliation for Harvard’s rejection of the Trump administration’s demands.

The Trump administration had proposed to settle its investigation into UCLA through a $1 billion payment from the institution. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has called it an extortion attempt.

UCLA has said that such a large payment would “devastate” the institution.

Monday's ruling concerns hundreds of medical research grants from the National Institutes of Health that include studies into Parkinson’s disease treatment, cancer recovery, cell regeneration in nerves and other areas that campus leaders argue are pivotal for improving the health of Americans.


Judge orders Trump administration to restore $500 million in federal grant funding to UCLA
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,616
5,943
113
The corruption here is breath-taking. Homan caught on camera taking a $50K bribe and the charges are dropped. Could you imagine the uproar if Biden or Garland stopped the criminal investigation into Bob Menendez? I mean, I've said it before, we live in a time where both sides are assuredly not equal. The Left stands by the rule of law, the right looks for ways to circumvent it or use it as a weapon against their opponents. I know a bunch of the right here will attempt to argue that Biden's DOJ attacked righties....but only because they broke laws and were being rightfully prosecuted. There is no equivalent.

Just look at what Trump is trying to do with higher education. They're using funding grants, grants that have already been approved, to force more conservative bullshit into the curriculum or punish those who speak out against Trump. Again, can you imagine the uproar if Biden did anything remotely close to this???
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. asked a US judge to throw out President Donald Trump’s $10 billion libel lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal report tying him to a bawdy birthday note to the late Jeffrey Epstein, calling the case “an affront to the First Amendment.”

The July 17 story about a note bearing Trump’s signature that was sent to Epstein along with a sketch of a naked woman in 2003 is true and doesn’t defame the president’s character, lawyers for the 94-year-old News Corp. chairman emeritus said Monday in a request to dismiss the suit.

“By its very nature, this meritless lawsuit threatens to chill the speech of those who dare to publish content that the President does not like,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing in federal court in Miami.


Trump sued July 18, accusing Murdoch, News Corp. and Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co. of maligning his character. The suit was filed as the president was fighting a firestorm of criticism over the government’s handling of documents related to the late, disgraced financier. Epstein died in prison in 2019 as he faced sex-trafficking charges.

The Wall Street Journal story, which provided details of a “birthday book” of notes compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday, raised further pressure on Trump, who has long denied any awareness of Epstein’s activities. House Democrats investigating the sex-trafficking operation run by Epstein earlier this month released the alleged birthday note that they said Trump sent to the late disgraced financier.

“Two weeks ago, in response to a congressional subpoena, Epstein’s estate produced the Birthday Book, which contains the letter bearing the bawdy drawing and plaintiff’s signature, exactly as The Wall Street Journal reported,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing.

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

Murdoch and News Corp. said in their filing that the First Amendment’s protections for truthful speech “are the backbone of the Constitution.”

Trump “acknowledged his friendship with Epstein,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing. “As the article reports, three months before the Birthday Book was gifted to Epstein, a New York magazine article quoted the plaintiff as saying that he had known Epstein for ‘15 years’ and that Epstein was a ‘terrific guy,’ ‘a lot of fun to be with,’ and ‘likes beautiful women as much as I do.’”

Read More: Murdoch to Give Trump Health Updates to Delay Epstein Deposition

Murdoch in August agreed to provide Trump’s lawyers with a sworn declaration “describing his current health condition” as well as regular updates on his health as part of a deal to delay any deposition in the case.

The filing comes days after a judge tossed Trump’s $15 billion defamation suit against the New York Times, which accused it of serving as a “mouthpiece” for the Democrats. The judge in that case said Trump’s lawyers “unmistakably and inexcusably” violated court rules by featuring “repetitive,” “superfluous” and “florid” allegations and details in the complaint. The judge gave Trump permission to refile a shorter lawsuit within the rules.

Murdoch Calls Trump’s Epstein Suit ‘Affront’ to Free Speech (1)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
The Wall Street Journal's owner, Rupert Murdoch, asked the court to toss the lawsuit from President Donald Trump over the Journal's report about the so-called "birthday book" for Jeffrey Epstein, Bloomberg Law reported.

The report said that Trump drew an outline of a woman and typed up a little script for a conversation between the two men where they shared a "secret."

more

Trump called it a lie and sued not only the Journal but its parent company, NewsCorp, and owner Murdoch personally, for $10 billion.

Want more breaking political news? Click for the latest headlines at Raw Story.

Since the lawsuit, the book was turned over to Congress and released to the public, with the page spreading across the internet.

Trump denied it was his, implying that someone had falsified his signature. FBI Director Kash Patel agreed to open an investigation into the allegedly fraudulent signature.

Murdoch filed the motion Monday, asking the Miami court to dismiss the case as the report does not defame the president's character.

Murdoch attacked the lawsuit as “an affront to the First Amendment.”

Despite Trump's lawsuit,the Murdochs are being discussed as possible co-owners of the U.S. version of TikTok.

Rupert Murdoch asks judge to toss Trump's lawsuit over Epstein birthday book: report
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
NBC News reporter Ken Dilanian reported Monday that those left in the Justice Department have been worried about President Donald Trump's revenge campaign since the beginning. Now there's real panic as he calls on them to be more aggressive in investigating his political opponents.



more

"We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA), former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who he misspelled as "Leticia."

"They're all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done," Trump said in the Saturday post without citing the laws he thinks were broken.

Want more breaking political news? Click for the latest headlines at Raw Story.

"Justice must be served now," Trump later wrote in all-caps.

Dilanian said that those at the DOJ have been worried about this since the beginning, and it's far worse than what was seen in the first Trump administration.

"We've never been here before," said Dilanian. "Even in the Trump administration."

"So, the people [who] have done business the same way for 30 years, some of them have, although many of them are leaving, are traumatized. They're not just concerned, they're absolutely traumatized by what's been happening at the Justice Department, not only on criminal cases but on all sorts of cases — antitrust cases, corporate monitor cases, the lack of enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act," he continued.



more

Former New York assistant district attorney Catherine Christian said that the DOJ staff isn't "traumatized" by a breach of tradition, "rather, it's so highly unethical for a prosecutor to choose people to prosecute for no reason other than, my boss hates them."

She said that typically, prosecutors are picking crimes and cases that can be prosecuted beyond a reasonable doubt using facts and evidence.

"But to just go after people just because they are perceived to be an enemy of the person who appointed you is just not what you do as an ethical prosecutor," she said.

Some, she said, have already resigned. Others know they'll likely be fired if they say "no" to Trump's demands.

But for a senior person at the DOJ to blame Trump in court, however, won't work.

"It was one thing to say, 'I was young, I didn't know what I was doing.' But saying, 'My boss made me do it,' doesn't play," she closed.


'My boss made me do it': DOJ vets fear following Trump's orders will land them in court
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
MIAMI (AP) — Hundreds of federal employees who lost their jobs in Elon Musk's cost-cutting blitz are being asked to return to work.

The General Services Administration has given the employees — who managed government workspaces — until the end of the week to accept or decline reinstatement, according to an internal memo obtained by The Associated Press. Those who accept must report for duty on Oct. 6 after what amounts to a seven-month paid vacation, during which time the GSA in some cases racked up high costs — passed along to taxpayers — to stay in dozens of properties whose leases it had slated for termination or were allowed to expire.



President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Sept. 19, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)© The Associated Press
“Ultimately, the outcome was the agency was left broken and understaffed,” said Chad Becker, a former GSA real estate official. “They didn’t have the people they needed to carry out basic functions.”

Becker, who represents owners with government leases at Arco Real Estate Solutions, said GSA has been in a “triage mode” for months. He said the sudden reversal of the downsizing reflects how Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency had gone too far, too fast.



more

Rehiring of purged federal employees

GSA was established in the 1940s to centralize the acquisition and management of thousands of federal workplaces. Its return to work request mirrors rehiring efforts at in several agencies targeted by DOGE. Last month, the IRS said it would allow some employees who took a resignation offer to remain on the job. The Labor Department has also brought back some employees who took buyouts, while the National Park Service earlier reinstated a number of purged employees.

Critical to the work of such agencies is the GSA, which manages many of the buildings. Starting in March, thousands of GSA employees left the agency as part of programs that encouraged them to resign or take early retirement. Hundreds of others — those subject to the recall notice — were dismissed as part of an aggressive push to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Though those employees did not show up for work, they were to be paid through the end of this month.



more

GSA representatives didn’t respond to detailed questions about the return-to-work notice, which the agency issued Friday. They also declined to discuss the agency's headcount, staffing decisions or the potential cost overruns generated by reversing its plans to terminate leases.

“GSA’s leadership team has reviewed workforce actions and is making adjustments in the best interest of the customer agencies we serve and the American taxpayers,” an agency spokesman said in an email.

Democrats have assailed the Trump administration's indiscriminate approach to slashing costs and jobs. Rep. Greg Stanton of Arizona, the top Democrat on the subcommittee overseeing the GSA, told AP there is no evidence that reductions at the agency “delivered any savings.”

“It’s created costly confusion while undermining the very services taxpayers depend on,” he said.



more

DOGE identified the agency, which had about 12,000 employees at the start of the Trump administration, as a chief target of its campaign to reduce fraud, waste and abuse in the federal government.

A small cohort of Musk's trusted aides embedded in GSA’s headquarters, sometimes sleeping on cots on the agency’s sixth floor, and pursued plans to abruptly cancel nearly half of the 7,500 leases in the federal portfolio. DOGE also wanted GSA to sell hundreds of federally owned buildings with the goal of generating billions in savings.

GSA started by sending more than 800 lease cancellation notices to landlords, in many cases without informing the government tenants. The agency also published a list of hundreds of government buildings that were targeted for sale.

DOGE's massive job cuts produced little savings

Pushback to GSA's dumping of its portfolio was swift, and both initiatives have been dialed back. More than 480 leases slated for termination by DOGE have since been spared. Those leases were for offices scattered around the country that are occupied by such agencies as the IRS, Social Security Administration and Food and Drug Administration.


DOGE's “Wall of Receipts,” which once boasted that the lease cancellations alone would save nearly $460 million, has since reduced that estimate to $140 million by the end of July, according to Becker, the former GSA real estate official.

Meanwhile, GSA embarked on massive job cuts. The administration slashed GSA’s headquarters staff by 79%, its portfolio managers by 65% and facilities managers by 35%, according to a federal official briefed on the situation. The official, who was not authorized to speak to the media, provided the statistics on condition of anonymity.

As a result of the internal turmoil, 131 leases expired without the government actually vacating the properties, the official said. The situation has exposed the agencies to steep fees because property owners have not been able to rent out those spaces to other tenants.

The public may soon get a clearer picture of what transpired at the agency.


The Government Accountability Office, an independent congressional watchdog, is examining the GSA’s management of its workforce, lease terminations and planned building disposals and expects to issue findings in the coming months, said David Marroni, a senior GAO official.

After cost-cutting blitz, Trump administration rehires hundreds of laid-off employees
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
A senior reporter at CNN who previously worked for Fox Business confirms the American job market is in a “significant slump.” And those “very beautiful” tariffs President Donald Trump continues to celebrate? Well, those deserve some of the blame — and could even be “backfiring completely.”

Trump’s tariffs have been problematic


In April, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257, which declared the U.S. trade deficit a national emergency and imposed tariffs on nearly all imports. By: Jim LoScalzo- Pool via CNP / MEGA© Knewz (CA)
Matt Egan, who covers business, the economy and financial markets, suggests that Trump’s tariffs “appear to be part of the problem,” particularly affecting sectors vulnerable to the administration’s import taxes. Speaking about the White House’s economic strategy, the CNN senior reporter explained, “They’re trying to engineer this American manufacturing renaissance. They’re trying to cause a jobs boom. That is not happening, right?” He added, “Economists say, at best, that effort is off to a slow start. At worst, it’s actually backfiring completely, that it’s been counterproductive.”

Jobs report numbers signal trouble


The August U.S. jobs report revealed weak hiring and rising unemployment, with industries faced with tariffs seeing the sharpest decline. By: Spencer Davis on Unsplash© Knewz (CA)
Egan pointed to the latest “dismal” jobs report — which showed only 22,000 new jobs added in August and an unemployment rate of 4.3 percent, making it the highest in four years — as particularly troubling for sectors hit by tariffs, such as manufacturing. “And this month was not an anomaly,” Egan noted, referencing a report from Apollo Global Management that found job losses in tariff-exposed industries began soon after Trump launched his global trade war. A separate survey released by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York revealed that the perceived chance of finding new employment after a job loss dropped to nearly 45 percent in August — the lowest level since 2013.

Tariff-hit sectors are losing jobs


Industries including manufacturing, construction and mining lost tens of thousands of jobs following the implementation of President Donald Trump’s new tariffs. By: d c on Unsplash© Knewz (CA)
Egan cited Bureau of Labor Statistics data showing significant job losses across several key industries, including a drop of 12,000 positions in manufacturing, 11,700 in wholesale trade, 7,000 in construction, and 6,000 in mining and logging. He also pointed out that since May — the month following Trump’s announcement of his “Liberation Day” tariffs, which he enacted using an executive order — manufacturing has consistently shed between 2,000 and 17,000 jobs each month.

Businesses report tariff pain


According to a new survey, most of the companies polled said tariffs are hurting, not helping, their businesses. By: Rinson Chory on Unsplash© Knewz (CA)
Egan also pointed out that most businesses surveyed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas reported being negatively affected by this year’s tariffs, with 72 percent saying they’ve been harmed. Only 4 percent of respondents said the import taxes have had a positive effect. Another 17 percent reported no noticeable impact.

U.S. job market is in a 'significant slump'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
President Donald Trump claimed that he would be deporting undocumented criminals, but according to a growing list of judges, that isn't what's happening, and they say the moves to detain citizens and legal residents are illegal. Overnight, four more judges added to a growing list of those calling the administration's actions unlawful.



more

Politico legal reporter Kyle Cheney cited four adjudicated cases in which U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was given a bond hearing rather than being thrown into one of the government holding camps.



In Iowa, one woman who has been in the U.S. for 20 years accidentally backed her car into an ICE vehicle, and agents arrested her, placing her in detention. Judge Leonard T. Strand ordered that she be given a bond hearing.

One man, also with no criminal record, who has lived in the U.S. for 32 years, was nabbed by ICE outside of his home. He too was being held without a bond hearing. An immigration judge claimed that as a non-citizen, he wasn't entitled to one, which a U.S. District Court judge found to be illegal.



more

A second man, who has a driving infraction and a DUI, was also told he wouldn't get a bond hearing. However, District Court Judge Richard Franklin Boulware II, in Nevada, ruled against ICE, stating that the man should be given a bond hearing instead of being detained.

The judge said that he should be given the hearing, "in part because of some extreme factors in his case," wrote Cheney.

There is man in Iowa, who has been in the U.S. for more than two decades, and "until recently, he had no criminal history," the court filing said. The judge in that case sentenced him to "time served."

But at some point while he was in the Polk County jail, ICE " lodged a detainer against him." After being sentenced to time served, ICE took "custody" of him, but he's remained in the county jail. So, Judge Stephen H. Locher said that he, too, deserved a bond hearing from the immigration judge instead of mandatory detention.

These were just four cases in the past 12 hours, adding to dozens before, in which judges say that ICE holding people in the detention facilities, without a bond hearing, is unlawful.

Four judges add to growing list of those saying Trump's detentions are illegal
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
84,165
122,274
113
BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled on Wednesday that it’s unconstitutional to require states to cooperate on immigration enforcement actions to get funding for disasters, which is overseen by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

A coalition of 20 state Democratic attorneys general in May filed a federal lawsuit claiming that the Trump administration is threatening to withhold billions of dollars of disaster-relief funds unless states agree to certain immigration enforcement actions.



more

In a ruling granting a summary judgment to the plaintiffs and denying one for the federal government, U.S. District Judge William Smith found that the “contested conditions are arbitrary and capricious” and that the actions are unconstitutional because they are “coercive, ambiguous, unrelated to the purpose of the federal grants.”

“Plaintiff States stand to suffer irreparable harm; the effect of the loss of emergency and disaster funds cannot be recovered later, and the downstream effect on disaster response and public safety are real and not compensable,” Smith wrote.

Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha said the ruling was a “win for the rule of law and reaffirms that the President may not pick and choose which laws he and his Administration obey.”

“Today’s permanent injunction by Judge Smith says, in no uncertain terms, that this Administration may not illegally impose immigration conditions on congressionally allocated federal funding for emergency services like disaster relief and flood mitigation. Case closed,” he said.


more

In their complaint, states argued that for decades they counted on federal funding to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters. But they argued conditions put forward by the Trump administration requiring them to commit state resources to immigration enforcement put at risk funding for everything from mitigating earthquake and flood risks to managing active wildfires.

The Department of Homeland Security “seek to upend this emergency management system, holding critical emergency preparedness and response funding hostage unless States promise to devote their scarce criminal enforcement resources, and other state agency resources, to the federal government’s own task of civil immigration enforcement beyond what state law allows,” the plaintiffs wrote.

They argued successfully that this not only was unconstitutional but that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act, a law that governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations.



more

“The conditions are arbitrary and capricious under the APA because DHS failed to provide a reasoned explanation, failed to consider the reliance interests of the states, and departed from longstanding funding practices without adequate justification,” Smith wrote.

The government had argued that the challenge was moot since it had already decided to exclude 12 of the 18 programs from having to comply with the immigration requirements. For the remaining programs, the government argued that this was a contract dispute that should be resolved in the Court of Federal Claims.

“Even if that were not so, Congress intended for the FEMA grant programs at issue to address national security and terrorism concerns that rely on the cooperation that the conditions promote,” the government wrote in court documents. “Congress did not preclude the placement of the challenged conditions on the grant programs at issue, and Plaintiffs have not established a likelihood of success on the merits with respect to these programs.”



Buddy Anthony surveys the remnants of his home on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Tylertown, Miss. (AP Photo/Sophie Bates)© The Associated Press
___

Michael Casey, The Associated Press

Judge rules feds can't require states to cooperate on immigration to get disaster money
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts