update - African migrants held in straightjackets and shackles for 16 hour deportation flight and fed bread and water

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
GREENBELT, Md. (AP) — A federal judge in Maryland late Thursday ruled President Donald Trump's administration cannot withhold citizenship from children born to people in the country illegally or temporarily, issuing the fourth court decision blocking the president's birthright citizenship order nationwide since a key U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June.




U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman's preliminary injunction was expected after the judge said last month she would issue such an order if the case were returned to her by an appeals court. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to her later in July.

Since June, two other district courts, as well as an appellate panel of judges, have also blocked the birthright order nationwide.

An email to the White House for comment was not immediately returned.

Trump’s January order would deny citizenship to children born to parents living in the U.S. illegally or temporarily.

Boardman in February issued a preliminary injunction blocking it nationwide. But the June ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court upended that decision and other court rulings blocking the order across the nation.

The justices ruled that lower courts generally can’t issue nationwide injunctions, but they didn’t rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class-action lawsuits and those brought by states.



In her ruling Thursday, Boardman certified a class of all children who have been born or will be born in the United States after February 19, 2025, who would be affected by Trump's order.

She said the plaintiffs in the lawsuit before her were “extremely likely” to win their argument that the birthright order violates the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which includes a citizenship clause that says all people born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to U.S. jurisdiction, are citizens. They were also likely to suffer irreparable harm if the order went into effect, she wrote.

The Associated Press

Judge blocks Trump's birthright order nationwide in fourth such ruling since Supreme Court decision
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
MIAMI (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday ordered a two-week halt to construction at an immigrant detention center in the Florida Everglades dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz” as she considers whether it violates environmental laws.

The facility was quickly built two months ago at a lightly used, single-runway training airport and can hold up to 3,000 detainees in temporary tent structures. The site was continuing to be built out, but the order by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams temporarily bars the installation of any new industrial-style lighting, as well as any paving, filling, excavating or fencing. The order also prohibits any other site expansion, including placing or erecting any additional buildings, tents, dormitories or other residential or administrative facilities.




The order doesn’t include any restrictions on law enforcement or immigration enforcement activity at the center, which is currently holding hundreds of detainees. Williams issued the temporary restraining order during a hearing and then followed up with a written order later Thursday.

Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe have asked Williams to issue a preliminary injunction to halt operations and further construction. The suit argues that the project threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars’ worth of environmental restoration.

“We’re pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperiled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,” said Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades.




A spokesperson for Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis decried the ruling but said it “will have no impact on immigration enforcement in Florida.”

“Alligator Alcatraz will remain operational, continuing to serve as a force multiplier to enhance deportation efforts,” spokesperson Alex Lanfranconi said in a statement.

The order is temporary, since arguments in the case are still pending

Plaintiffs presented witnesses Wednesday and Thursday in support of the injunction, while attorneys for the state and federal government were scheduled to present next week.

Following Thursday’s testimony, Paul Schwiep, an attorney for the environmental groups, asked Williams to issue a temporary restraining order that would at least prevent any new construction at the site while the preliminary injunction was argued.

Williams asked Florida attorney Jesse Panuccio if the state would agree to halt construction so that she wouldn’t need to issue the restraining order. She pointed out that anything built at the site would likely remain there permanently, regardless of how the case was ultimately decided.




Panuccio said he couldn’t guarantee that the state would stop all work.

This sparked an hour-long hearing about the temporary restraining order, which will be in place for the next two weeks while the ongoing preliminary injunction hearing continues. Temporary restraining orders are meant to maintain the status quo during a legal dispute for a short period of time, while preliminary injunctions are generally issued after a longer hearing and last until the final resolution of the case.

The legal fight centers on federal vs. state control of the site

The crux of the plaintiffs’ argument is that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects.

Panuccio said during the hearing that although the detention center would be holding federal detainees, the construction and operation of the facility is entirely under the state of Florida, meaning the NEPA review wouldn’t apply.


Schwiep said the purpose of the facility is for immigration enforcement, which is exclusively a federal function. He said the facility wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for the federal government’s desire for a facility to hold detainees.

Williams said Thursday that the detention facility was, at a minimum, a joint partnership between the state and federal government.

Christopher McVoy, a soil physicist, hydrologist and wetlands ecologist, testified for the plaintiffs on Thursday that at least 20 acres (8 hectares) of asphalt have been added to the site since the Florida Department of Emergency Management began construction, based on a tour that he took of the facility in June, just days before it opened, and subsequent arial photos of the site. Tents, trailers and other heavy equipment have also been moved to the airport, which previously had just a few small structures.


Dillon Reio, a licensed professional geologist, testified that the new paving could lead to an increase in water runoff to the adjacent wetlands and spread harmful chemicals into the Everglades.

A second lawsuit alleges violations of detainees’ rights

The lawsuit in Miami against federal and state authorities is one of two legal challenges to the South Florida detention center, which was built more than a month ago by the state of Florida on an isolated airstrip owned by Miami-Dade County.

A second lawsuit brought by civil rights groups says detainees’ constitutional rights are being violated since they are barred from meeting lawyers, are being held without any charges, and a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Aug. 18.

In a court filing in the civil rights lawsuit on Thursday, the state of Florida said that detainees have been allowed to meet with their lawyers for three weeks at the detention center, which opened July 3, despite some initial delays due to logistical challenges in having private contractors build infrastructure and install equipment. Since July 15, the state has granted every request for a detainee to meet with an attorney, it said.


“More meetings are taking place every day and there have been no complaints,” according to the filing.

Construction, maintenance and operation of the detention center are done by the state of Florida, “without involvement of the federal government,” though the state is granted authority over the detainees through an intergovernmental agreement with federal agencies, the court filing said.

Under the 55-year-old federal environmental law, federal agencies should have examined how the detention center’s construction would impact the environment, identified ways to minimize the impact and followed other procedural rules such as allowing public comment, according to the environmental groups and the tribe.

It makes no difference that the detention center was built by the state of Florida, since federal agencies have authority over immigration, the lawsuit said.


Attorneys for federal and state agencies last week asked Williams to dismiss or transfer the injunction request, saying the lawsuit was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida’s southern district is the wrong venue for the lawsuit since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state’s middle district, they said.

Williams had yet to rule on that argument.

The lawsuits were being heard as DeSantis′ administration apparently was preparing to build a second immigration detention center at a Florida National Guard training center in north Florida. At least one contract has been awarded for what’s labeled in state records as the “North Detention Facility.”

David Fischer, The Associated Press

Judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
Newly appointed Washington D.C. Attorney General Jean Pirro has come up with a radical new recruitment strategy for her office: hire Fox News watchers.

The former co-host of The Five, who was sworn in to her position of D.C. AG earlier this week, returned to her old network to bemoan the skeletal nature of her office, before making a plea for people to get in touch with their resumes.





Pirro appeared on The Ingraham Angle with Laura Ingraham, where she was asked about the “very, very big problem with staffing.”

“Assistant attorney generals on down saying, ‘We have great plans, we’re doing great things. But we’re down like two-thirds staff. What’s going on?” Ingraham asked her.

“Yeah, I’m down 90 prosecutors, 60 investigators and paralegals,” Pirro replied. When pushed as to why that was, she added: “Because nobody cared. I’m telling you right now, nobody cared enough to make sure that office was running. I’m gonna have that office running.”

Pirro then looked at the camera directly, addressing viewers, before saying: “If you want a job in the nation’s capital in the premier office, the largest U.S. Attorney’s office, contact me at Jeanine.Pirro@USDOJ.gov.”

Until last month, Pirro was a co-host of Fox’s right-wing panel program and previously helmed her own weekend show. She took the oath of office on Wednesday in an Oval Office ceremony attended by Donald Trump.

Trump praised her as someone who’d “devoted her life to the pursuit of justice, the defense of freedom and the fair, equal and impartial rule of law” and called her “a tireless warrior on behalf of the most vulnerable people in our society.”



Until last month Pirro was a co-host of Fox’s right-wing panel program and previously helmed her own weekend show. She took the oath of office on Wednesday in an Oval Office ceremony attended by Donald Trump (AP)
Despite having only been confirmed the position of D.C. AG on Saturday, Pirro went on to complain about the job to Ingraham Wednesday, telling her former colleague: “Government is hard.”

“Government is about accountability and responsibility. I work 12 hours at least every day. You’re never not working,” she said. “The government, let me tell you, they waste millions. I’m looking at contracts. I want to indict people for contracts that the U.S. government is giving out voluntarily. The worst!”



Prior to her career on Fox News, Pirro gained legal experience as both a working prosecutor and as a judge hearing cases in criminal court.

She worked as an assistant district attorney in New York’s Westchester County from 1975 to 1990, when she was elected to a county judge position as a Republican. Three years later, she sought and won election as the Westchester County District Attorney, a position she would hold for more than a decade by winning subsequent elections in 1997 and 2001.

Jeanine Pirro has a new recruitment strategy for her DC attorney office: Hire Fox News viewers
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Valcazar

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
WASHINGTON (AP) — A split appeals court panel tossed out a judge’s contempt finding against President Donald Trump's administration on Friday in a case over deportations to an El Salvador prison.

The decision comes after planes carrying Venezuelan migrants landed at the prison even after U.S District Judge James E. Boasberg said in court they must return to the United States.




Boasberg found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt of court. The ruling marked a dramatic battle between the judicial and executive branches of government.

But the divided three-judge panel in the nation’s capital found that Boasberg had exceeded his authority and intruded on the executive branch’s foreign affairs powers.

Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao, both of whom were nominated by Trump in his first term in the White House, agreed with the unsigned majority opinion.

“The district court’s order attempts to control the Executive Branch’s conduct of foreign affairs, an area in which a court’s power is at its lowest ebb,” Rao wrote.

Judge Cornelia Pillard, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, dissented. “The majority does an exemplary judge a grave disservice by overstepping its bounds to upend his effort to vindicate the judicial authority that is our shared trust,” she wrote.



The 250 migrants have since been released back to their home country in a prisoner swap with the U.S. after months at the mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT.

Boasberg had accused Trump administration officials of rushing deportees out of the U.S. under the Alien Enemies Act before they could challenge their removal in court and then willfully disregarding his order that planes already in the air should return.

The Trump administration has denied any violation, saying the judge's directive to return the planes was made verbally in court but not included in his written order.

Last month, the Justice Department filed an unusual judicial misconduct complaint against Boasberg over comments he allegedly made at a closed-door meeting of judges as well as his actions in the deportations case. The complaint calls for the case to be taken away from Boasberg while an investigation proceeds.




Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the appeals court ruling, calling it a “MAJOR victory defending President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act” in a social media post and vowing to “continue fighting and WINNING in court.”

Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney who represented the migrants, said there was “zero ambiguity” in Boasberg's order about the planes.

“We strongly disagree with today’s decision regarding contempt and are considering all options going forward," he said.

Lindsay Whitehurst And Michael Kunzelman, The Associated Press

Appeals court tosses judge's contempt finding against Trump administration in prison deportations
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is offering young people student loan forgiveness as a means to entice them into considering careers as ICE agents.

Noem is seeking to bolster the ranks of the controversial law enforcement agency to help with President Donald Trump’s mass roundup of illegal immigrants and last week invited applications for U.S. citizens to join.




“Your country is calling you to serve at ICE,” she said in a statement. “Your country needs dedicated men and women of ICE to get the worst of the worst criminals out of our country.

“This is a defining moment in our nation’s history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland.”

The recruitment drive has been made possible by Trump’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill,” which passed Congress in early July and was signed into law by the president on Independence Day. It set aside more than $170 billion in taxpayers’ cash for immigration enforcement over the next decade.

Republicans in Congress earmarked $30 billion of that total for the hiring spree and $45 billion for new detention centers.

Noem appeared on Fox News’s flagship breakfast show Fox and Friends on Wednesday and announced that ICE had already received 80,000 new applications for the 10,000 positions she is seeking to fill and revealed that she had done away with age restrictions to make the opportunity open to younger people.




Previously, applicants had to be aged between 21 and 37 or 40 to be considered, depending on the nature of the role they were hoping to secure.

“We no longer have a cap on how old you can be or you can continue at age 18, sign up for ICE and join us and be a part of it,” Noem told the show.

“We’ll get you trained and ready to be equipped to go out on the streets and help protect families.”

As part of the ICE expansion, the agency is seeking to target “Gen Z and early-career professionals,” as well as ex-law enforcement and military personnel, with an advertising blitz that it hopes will reach 42 million people across platforms like YouTube, X, HBO Max, Amazon Prime and Hulu.

Among the other benefits being offered to encourage Americans to sign up, in addition to student loan forgiveness, is a $50,000 golden handshake, enhanced retirement benefits, and extensive overtime opportunities.



Federal agents detain a man as they patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K Javitz Federal Building in New York City on August 5 2025 (Spencer Platt/Getty)
One person who has already snapped up the opportunity is former Superman TV actor Dean Cain, who announced his decision on social media earlier this week and encouraged others to follow his example, stressing that anyone doing so would enjoy the “great benefits” on offer and would not need an undergraduate degree to be considered.



“Since President Trump took office, ICE has arrested hundreds of thousands of criminals including terrorists, rapists, murderers, pedophiles, MS-13 gang members, drug traffickers, you name it – very dangerous people who are no longer on the streets,” Cain told his followers.

“If you want to help save America, ICE is arresting the worst of the worst and removing them from America's streets. I like that. I voted for that.

“They need your help, we need your help, to protect our homeland for families. Join today if it’s something that tickles your fancy because we can use you.”

ICE has faced heavy criticism and some ridicule for its handling of its task in the first 200 days of Trump’s presidency. The agency’s actions inspired tense protests in Los Angeles in June. Still, this week the president’s border czar Tom Homan claimed that 300,000 non-citizens had been deported in that time, and another million had left the United States voluntarily.


Concerns about due process being observed and the conditions in which detainees are being held persist, however.

The pace of ICE’s daily arrest rate also fell by nearly 20 percent in July amid reports of plummeting morale among officers, some of whom have complained they spend more time “arresting gardeners” than pursuing criminals.


Kristi Noem is offering teenagers student loan forgiveness if they sign up to be an ICE agent
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
The Trump administration is seeking a $1 billion settlement from the University of California, Los Angeles, a White House official said Friday.

The person was not authorized to speak publicly about the request and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The Trump administration has suspended $584 million in federal grants, the university said this week.




In recent weeks, the Department of Justice has accused UCLA of antisemitism.

UCLA is the first public university whose federal grants have been targeted by the administration over allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action. The Trump administration has frozen or paused federal funding over similar allegations against private colleges.



FILE - Students walk past Royce Hall at the University of California, Los Angeles, campus in Los Angeles, Aug. 15, 2024. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)© The Associated Press
The new UC president, James B. Milliken, said in a statement Friday that it had received notice from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it.

“Earlier this week, we offered to engage in good faith dialogue with the Department to protect the University and its critical research mission,” Milliken said. “As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country’s greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians.”




UCLA recently reached a $6 million settlement with three Jewish students and a Jewish professor who sued the university, arguing it violated their civil rights by allowing pro-Palestinian protesters in 2024 to block their access to classes and other areas on campus.

The university has said it is committed to campus safety and inclusivity and will continue to implement recommendations.

Michelle L. Price, The Associated Press

Trump administration seeks $1 billion settlement from UCLA, a White House official says
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
1754683333795.png

Let's get that corporate bribe money happening for the Orange Guy!!!
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
Two prominent GOP election deniers in Georgia will serve on the Fulton County Board of Elections, per an order by a state court issued Sunday.


The Fulton County Board of Commissioners originally voted 5-2 in May to reject Julie Adams and Jason Frazier from serving on the board of elections, but the county Republican party sued claiming the Board of Commissioners violated state law by rejecting Adams’ and Fraziers’ nominations.


The Fulton County Superior Court found that the Board of Commissioners did not have the authority to reject Adams and Frazier. “The court also notes that the appointment statute contains no provision to support the respondents’ position that it should have the power to veto any given nominee and force the county chairperson to submit other nominees,” Fulton Superior Court Judge David Emerson wrote in his order.


Adams, who previously served on the Fulton Board of Elections and was up for reappointment in May, was at the center of a 2024 controversy when she refused to certify the county’s primary election results. Adams also has ties to the Cleta Mitchell-led Election Integrity Network (EIN) and the far-right group Tea Party Patriots. She previously refused to certify her county’s primary election because she claimed she didn’t have access to all information about the voting process in order to verify the results.


Adams filed three unsuccessful lawsuits to get sensitive election data — including a list of all registered voters, voter check-in lists from each precinct and a list of all voters who requested, received and/or returned absentee ballots — in order to certify the election.


Frazier also has a history of promoting election denialism in the Peach State: In August 2024, he filed a lawsuit against the Fulton County election board falsely claiming that they failed to properly maintain the county’s voter rolls and respond to voter challenges. The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed a month later.


“It’s not possible to work with folks trying to sow discord and chaos,” Commissioner Mo Ivory said during the board’s meeting to consider Adams’ and Frazier’s appointments.


In his order, Emerson wrote that “the lack of these appointments harms the election process and deprives the nominating party of representation on the BOE.”

 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,749
119,964
113
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A judge on Friday was considering a Trump administration request to end a decades-old policy on protections for immigrant children in federal custody that the government says is inhibiting its immigration crackdown.

The administration asked U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles during a hearing to dissolve the policy, which limits how long Customs and Border Protection can hold immigrant children and requires them to be kept in safe and sanitary conditions.


Gee, who oversees what is known as the Flores agreement, expressed skepticism at the government’s request but did not immediately issue a ruling. It was not clear how soon she will rule.

The judge pressed government attorney Joshua McCroskey on why President Donald Trump's administration was holding children at the border for longer than the 72 hours laid out in the agreement when border arrests have reached record lows. She said it seems like conditions should be improving but they “are deteriorating.”

“It seems counterintuitive that should happen unless it’s willful,” said Gee, who was nominated to the court by President Barack Obama.

McCroskey said some children are being held for longer because Trump as part of his crackdown ended the Biden administration's policy that allowed expedited releases of immigrants. McCroskey also pointed to logistical challenges that resulted from the closure of temporary facilities that were set up under President Joe Biden to handle an influx of immigrants.





In May, CBP held 46 children over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April.

Advocates for immigrant children asked the judge to keep protections and oversight in place and submitted accounts from immigrants in Texas family detention centers who described adults fighting children for clean water, despondent toddlers and a child with swollen feet who was denied a medical exam. The advocates also want the judge to expand independent monitoring.

“I have met children who have spent days in jail cells with barely more than ramen noodles to eat, lights on day and night, no sunlight or access to the outside world and the indignity of using the restroom in front of guards. On top of that trauma — then to be flown to family detention and locked up with no end in sight? It is truly shameful,” Leecia Welch, the deputy legal director at Children’s Rights, said in an interview after the hearing.


The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of immigrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. It governs the conditions for all immigrant children in U.S. custody, including those traveling alone or with their parents.

In its written motion, the Trump administration said the government has made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement.

The administration is looking to expand immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz,” where a lawsuit alleges detainees’ constitutional rights are being violated. In court, an attorney for the government, Tiberius Davis, acknowledged that the agreement hampers the administration's efforts, even though Trump’s tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities.



FILE - Immigrants seeking asylum walk through the ICE South Texas Family Residential Center on Aug. 23, 2019, in Dilley, Texas. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)© The Associated Press
Davis said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. "But currently under the Flores settlement agreement, that’s essentially void,” he said.

The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when the children are transferred from CPB custody to the Department of Health and Human Services. But she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs.

Valerie Gonzalez, The Associated Press

Judge weighs Trump administration's request to end protections for immigrant children
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
10,149
9,317
113
This is third world shit.
There is no government or country on earth where the only qualification for a job is blind loyalty that is not epically corrupt.

I know the apologists will say don't all administrations hire loyalists? Yes, they do, but those folks have typically proper relevant experience and are not blind loyalists who will break the law. A shit ton of DOJ lawyers are resigning after being asked to pursue nonsense cases, and a couple of them who have pursued the nonsense are being threatened with referrals to their relevant Bar associations by the sitting judges.
 
Toronto Escorts