When an Expert Disagrees with the Experts
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
You do get that is comedy right?
When 999 epidemiologists agree on something and 1 disagrees, it's pretty reasonable for the rest of us to go with the opinion of the masses. The scientists themselves will investigate each others claims and if the 1 has better evidence, the rest will follow along.
When 999 epidemiologists agree on something and 1 disagrees, it's pretty reasonable for the rest of us to go with the opinion of the masses. The scientists themselves will investigate each others claims and if the 1 has better evidence, the rest will follow along.
No. I have time to read enough scientific information on covid during the day. You should try it.
In that case, a bit more science for you.
Show jumper suffered 'extremely rare' reaction to Moderna vaccine
Imogen Allen, 22, was told by doctors that the clots, which formed two weeks after she was jabbed, could have been triggered by the vaccine alongside five years on the combined contraceptive pill.
Do you have a point with that post? Even the Daily Mail is reporting it as "extremely rare" and I don't recall anyone denying that there are rare complications.In that case, a bit more science for you.
Show jumper suffered 'extremely rare' reaction to Moderna vaccine
Imogen Allen, 22, was told by doctors that the clots, which formed two weeks after she was jabbed, could have been triggered by the vaccine alongside five years on the combined contraceptive pill.www.dailymail.co.uk
Nice cleavage though.
"Experts " rushed a drug to the market, then the same "experts" convinced an healthy 22 years old athlete, who was in virtually zero danger from covid, to take it. She suffered the "unforseen " reaction and her life is pretty much over. Sucks to be her, eh?
Where do you get the myth that a 22 year old athlete has "Zero danger from Covid", especially as there were over 3000 deaths in the USA from those within the 18 - 29 age group!!
Ontario recommends Pfizer shots instead of Moderna for young adults over possible heart risks
'I know that this news may make some people nervous.... But the benefits of vaccination continue to significantly outweigh the risks of COVID-19'
nationalpost.com
Ah, no. Science doesn't work based on consensus. It is based on proposing an hypothesis and then proving or disproving it. In this case, there is a reason why it takes years and sometimes decades for a drug to make it to the market- it needs to be tested.
You mean the 59 or so years that mRNA has been researched and developed don't count?
What about the 20 years into viral vector vaccines or the more than 25 years into adenovirus vector vaccine ?
Last edited:
So far scientist were able to finalize and put in production a vaccine that had 10 year research behind. They adapted it in under a year for Covid 19 saving millions around the world from dying or get life impacting health issues and saving worldwide economy.
Well, they didn't protect Imogen Allen, 22. They actually made her life a living hell by pressuring her to take the medication she did not need. And there are PLENTY of other examples. First, do no harm- never forget that.
Does not state "zero risks" for deaths for a 22 year old from the Covid-19 virus!!Ontario recommends Pfizer shots instead of Moderna for young adults over possible heart risks
'I know that this news may make some people nervous.... But the benefits of vaccination continue to significantly outweigh the risks of COVID-19'
No unfortunately.
But so far this vaccine does not have more, or less, after effect then any other existing vaccine.
In fact it has as much % of effect as birth control pill. And that person was also taking birth control pills.
Sucks to be her...and many, many others who shall remain anonymous because we all have to be vaccinated to protect the old, fat and the sick.
Find me a single life saving medication/vaccines/treatment that has zero harm risk.
