Windows 7 and the Linux lesson

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,059
6,188
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Just recently finished my upgrade to Ubuntu 9.04 without incident or issue.
Using 9.04 right now, it's nice.
Wonder if the same will apply with upcoming Win 7.....


Windows 7 and the Linux lesson

Just wait for the RC. And keep waiting...

By Gavin Clarke in San Francisco • Posted in Operating Systems, 24th April 2009

You may love Linux or hate it, but when a distribution is complete, there's very little hesitation by commercial operators when it comes to getting the completed operating system out there.

The Ubuntu 9.04 release candidate was posted on April 16 with final code promised for seven days later on April 23. The final Ubuntu 9.04 code was turned around as promised.


The same cannot be said of Microsoft and Windows. And that's causing some frustration among those who want to get on with Windows 7.

The Windows 7 Release Candidate - build 7100 - has reportedly been leaked to the web. And unlike previous Windows 7 builds that showed up on one torrent here or there, the release candidate's on four. The word is that Windows 7 Release Candidate will be available to MSDN and TechNet members at the end of next week with general availability on May 5.

OK, Ubuntu is no Windows and Microsoft will say Windows is far more complicated. It has millions more lines of code. It is far more integrated with other products and has a larger ecosystem of hardware and software that it must ensure that it works with. Hence, slower release cycles.

However, Windows 7 was finished ages ago. Yes, we had the first code in in October and a beta in January - during which time very little in the build appears to have changed. We've had performance improvements and bug fixes, but Microsoft's been on the triage fast track, to the alarm of some early testers.

The only significant difference between last October's beta and the release candidate will be the inclusion of an anti-trust button. This will let users turn off Internet Explorer 8, along with other Microsoft applications, and has been included to satisfy European regulators who feel that Microsoft is hurting competitors by shipping its applications with Windows.

And yet, for all its completeness, Microsoft can't let Windows 7 go. It won't even, apparently, acknowledge that there's a release candidate yet.

Yet the evidence speaks for itself. Plus, Windows is so baked that Microsoft partners are already using Windows 7 on their PCs instead of Windows Vista. The message is clear: there's nothing left to do on Windows 7. Just let go and stop trying to make more of it.

The problem for Microsoft, though, is the organization and the ecosystem - not the operating system. Windows 7 might be done, but now Microsoft's got to hand the code to hardware and software partners for testing - to avoid the disaster that was compatibility in Windows Vista. That takes time. Plus, it's got to make sure the Windows 7 integrations work with the wave of new products - like Office 2010 - plus existing software.

Then, Microsoft's got to let marketing teams construct fancy SKU pricing and packaging options while holding endless meetings about meetings. And finally, as is Microsoft's style, it'll arrange a huge artifice of a global launch replete with glowing customer and partner endorsements and paid-for whitepapers from IDC all pointing to how this version of Windows is the best yet, and will make you more productive that the last version.

All that takes time.

Which is remarkable when you consider how Windows has become a commodity, and how Windows 7 offers very little different from Windows Vista or how little it's changed during the build process. A company other than Microsoft might have open-sourced this beast years ago, in order to free itself from the cost and delay of having to keep re-inventing the wheel. That's why IBM created Eclipse for development tools and others jumped on board.

Windows 7 might be done, but now we're in the classic waiting phase during which the organization must catch up and get behind the official launch. Microsoft could learn from the commercial backers of Linux distros that put the technology and users first. ®
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,059
6,188
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
That does seem to be the general consensus as Win 7 gets very good reviews so far.
 

jwmorrice

Gentleman by Profession
Jun 30, 2003
7,133
2
0
In the laboratory.
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/27/windows_7_xp_mode/
Windows 7 gets built in XP mode
Microsoft's new OS comes with compatibility insurance policy (sort of)
By Kelly Fiveash
Posted in Operating Systems, 27th April 2009 10:29 GMT


Microsoft is adding a "Windows XP Mode" to Windows 7, in a move to encourage users to make the switch to the software vendor's forthcoming operating system.

The firm has built its XP mode into Windows 7 by using the Windows Virtual PC technology Microsoft acquired in 2003, to make the OS compatible to run apps designed for Vista's predecessor.

Redmond was keen to emphasise in a blog post (http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/bu...n-windows-xp-mode-and-windows-virtual-pc.aspx) late on Friday that it's hoping to woo small businesses to move to Windows 7 by bigging up the XP mode feature.

"Windows XP Mode is specifically designed to help small businesses move to Windows 7," said Microsoft. "Windows XP Mode provides you with the flexibility to run many older productivity applications on a Windows 7 based PC."

Users can install apps directly into the virtualised XP environment. The applications are then published to the Windows 7 desktop and they can be run from within that OS.

Microsoft said it will release a beta of Windows XP mode and Windows Virtual PC for Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate "soon" but wasn't more specific about when the test builds will land.

When Microsoft released Vista over two years ago, many businesses and individuals complained about compatibility snafus with applications that simply wouldn't work within the new OS.

Presumably Redmond has built in its virtualised XP insurance policy into Windows 7, a release candidate for which is expected on 30 April (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/26/windows_7_release_candidate/), to avoid some of the problems that dogged Vista from day one. ®
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,059
6,188
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Was kinds hoping M$ was gonna get this one done right.....
 

mooger

New member
Apr 1, 2008
11
0
0
I've been running a Windows 7 for a couple weeks and can say that it IS miles ahead of XP and a huge improvement over Vista.

As for virtualization, MS has a lot of catching up to do as Zen (Citrix) and VMware have been dominating the space for years.

Oh, and my copy of Windows 7 is legit, not pirated. I had to mention that :)
 

BoringBob

New member
Feb 13, 2009
574
0
0
Gavin Clark is a well known anti-microsoft anti-copyright pro-free software whiner. Takes his comments with a massive grain of salt.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,059
6,188
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
You prefer to continue being a meek M$ slave?
Or would you like to free yourself?
Gavin Clark shows you some options, the choice is yours.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts