Leticia James is a loser!!
- Thread starter mitchell76
- Start date
Yeah non-consensually in a change room. What do you think she was in there for exactly? Just chatting? Discussing politics?
Her word against his. She couldn't even remember when it happened. Which is why civil court doesn't need solid evidence to judge for the plaintiff. In this case, the democrat judge ruled in favour of the plaintiff.
Use common sense even though your bias controls your good judgement.
If Hamas was taken to civil court for their rape accusations you would be having a stroke defending them after they would most definitely be found guilty.
The only one who defends rape and murder here is you as proven by your blind support of terrorists.
Ah yes, when you have no argument, start name calling.
The death knell of someone losing an argument.
ps you lost this one pal, you can go back to bed now.
Yeah sure...we all know you never leave your basement so you can stop fantasizing.And if "she had it coming" is your understanding of consent you would likely be a skoobid rapist if you ever got lucky enough to be anywhere private with a woman.
I've been on first or second dates with civvies and even a potential SB where they invited me into the change room to show me something. Were they flirting, teasing? Yup! Did that give me the right to "grab them by the pussy"? Or if I did put the moves on them, and they tell me (in any manner) to back off... and I don't... then it becomes a non-consensual sexual assault.
Again, I understand you incel-types likely have no direct experience in making such decisions. So, seeing as I don't give opinions on the rules of playing WoW or Dungeons and Dragons, I'd appreciate you staying out of the discussions of consensual encounters with real women. Not all women are step-sisters asking you (their step-bro) to tell them if their bikini is too small.
View attachment 319624
You on dates...hahahahaha...that's a good one! Lol!
Says the homophobe who supports terrorists raping their victims before they murder them.
Hypocrite much?
Judging by your incessant responses to my posts you seem triggered. Maybe that's why you like twisting words so you can invent your own arguments?
I'm flattered you've put in so much effort and are thinking of me.
That has already been answered. He asked her to help with some clothes and she agreed. What she did not agree with, is to have his filthy fingers shoved into her non-consensually.
Your argument is also ludicrous. One the one hand you keep pointing to the courts not calling it rape under NY law. But on the other, you ignore the courts finding Trump guilty of sexual abuse and agreeing that he infact DID shove his finger into Caroll non-consensually.
You are making your arguments look foolish.
Why would someone who is not a close friend ask someone "to help them with some clothes" in a private change room?
Ever stop and ask yourself that?
She saw an opportunity to cash in and she took it. Simple. If it was anyone who wasn't famous being accused she would have been laughed out of court.
She couldn't even remember the year it happened when she was asked!
She fooled everyone and then started bragging about how she was going to spend the money. Total fraud.
I said this already. They could have been close friends. They could have been dating. Heck, they could have been fucking. It does not matter.
The only questions to ask are:
- Did Trump take her into the dressing room, for whatever reason? - Yes.
- Did he NON CONSENSUALLY insert his finger into her pussy? - YES.
That is rape. Regardless of what NY law says, that is rape. End of story.
And that's the reason why only 51% confidence in a civil trial is required so the democratic judge didn't need firm evidence and gave her the benefit of the doubt. He said/she said.
A wise person would see through all that and realize she seized an opportunity to capitalize...which explains why she started bragging about the money afterwards. True rape victims don't do that. It's an insult to legitimate victims.
One of the swaying arguments was that she told two of her friends about it. They were not there in the changeroom...there was no foursome.
They were not direct witnesses. They were only told what allegedly happened.
The objective fact of the matter is that the case was tried, and the jury found the the sexual assault allegations to be true. So clearly this is not about giving anyone the benefit of the doubt. Trump was allowed to speak and defend himself and the jury found him guilty despite that. He has only his actions to blame for it.
Also how do you know what "true rape victims" do or don't ?
Why are you trying to switch the topic to your support of genocide, skoobypoo?
Why do you refuse to let courts rule, whether they be SDNY or the ICC?
You really have trouble with the idea of consent, don't you?
Did you just disappear the jury?
Another entitled NY state DA.
NEW: DA Sandra Doorley, who fled from police because she thought she should get special treatment, has reportedly deleted her X account because you all were too mean to her. Remarkable! ‘Corrupt Karen’ has fled social media just like she fled the cop after going viral for chastising a police officer for trying to pull her over. Doorley said she was “stressed” with murder cases and tried calling the police chief to get her out of trouble. The Monroe County DA in NY also told the officer that he should have known better than to pull over a black SUV. Resign!
NEW: DA Sandra Doorley, who fled from police because she thought she should get special treatment, has reportedly deleted her X account because you all were too mean to her. Remarkable! ‘Corrupt Karen’ has fled social media just like she fled the cop after going viral for chastising a police officer for trying to pull her over. Doorley said she was “stressed” with murder cases and tried calling the police chief to get her out of trouble. The Monroe County DA in NY also told the officer that he should have known better than to pull over a black SUV. Resign!
