Steeles Royal

Feds have 7 days to remedy breach of Khadr's rights

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,734
3,012
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
OTTAWA — The courts have once again concluded that the Harper government has not done enough to protect the constitutional rights of Toronto-born terrorism suspect Omar Khadr.

The Federal Court of Canada ruled Monday that the government has seven days to come up with a list of remedies to its breach of Khadr's constitutional rights.

The Canadian citizen -- the last Western national held at the much-maligned U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba -- is entitled to "procedural fairness and natural justice."

Justice Russel Zinn ruled that Ottawa did not meet the standard set by the Supreme Court of Canada this past January when it ordered the federal government to right the wrongs it had brought on the 23-year-old accused of killing a U.S. medic in 2002 in Afghanistan.

The Pentagon has charged that the then-15-year-old Khadr tossed a grenade which killed the medic during a firefight between Taliban supporters and U.S. forces.

The top court had declared in January that Khadr's rights had been violated and it demanded the Harper government come up with a remedy.

The government sent a diplomatic note to Washington one month later asking that information Canadian officials obtained from Khadr during a 2003 visit to Guantanamo not be used in the prosecution against him.

Khadr's lawyers said that wasn't good enough and asked the Federal Court to review the government's response. They also criticized the government for ignoring their requests for a meeting to discuss the Supreme Court ruling, which stopped short of ordering the government to ask that Khadr be brought back to Canada.

Zinn concluded Monday that the diplomatic simply note wasn't remedy enough.

"I do not share the view that Canada, in its actions taken to date, has remedied the breach or that there are no other potential curative remedies available," said the ruling.

"It is clear on the record before the Court that the breach has not been cured."

Moreover, Zinn found that Washington simply ignored the request Canada made in the diplomatic note.

"The U.S. merely responded that the prosecution of Mr. Khadr would be governed by the Military Commissions Act," Zinn wrote.

"Second, the record discloses that following the response by the U.S. government to Canada's request, the information was used by the U.S. in the prosecution of Mr. Khadr."

In April, when Khadr's military tribunal resumed, a U.S. witness said she used video recordings of the Canadian government interviews with Khadr to "refresh her memory," Monday's ruling stated.

The evidence that Canada failed to have excluded from Khadr's prosecution included seven hours of videotaped interrogations by a Canadian Security Intelligence Service officer that depicted the then teenaged inmate sobbing and moaning and asking for protection from his American captors.

Khadr's lawyer Nathan Whitling said Monday's ruling means the government has "once again been called upon by the courts to do the right thing."

Whitling said he hopes Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon "take advantage of this opportunity" to finally request the repatriation of Khadr.

The government has consistently refused to request the repatriation of Khadr.

The only government response to Monday's ruling was a single sentence, e-mailed from Cannon's junior spokeswoman that said: "We will review the decision rendered by Justice Zinn of the Federal Court of Canada."

NDP human rights critic Wayne Marston said Khadr was a child soldier at the time of his alleged offences and should not be facing the U.S. military tribunal.

"This is the time to bring Omar Khadr home," he said.

Khadr's Guantanamo tribunal is to resume in August.

Zinn said the "explorative process" he outlined in his ruling "must be undertaken with some urgency."

And the justice signalled he is growing weary of delays and will take matters into his own hands, if necessary.

"I retain jurisdiction to impose a remedy if, after the process described herein, Canada has not implemented an effective remedy within a reasonably practicable period of time."

http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/lo...ent-khadr-100705/20100705/?hub=TorontoNewHome
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,377
10,725
113
Room 112
In my opinion Khadr forfeited his rights as a Canadian citizen when he was caught in the battlefields of Afganistan.
 

Captain Fantastic

...Winning
Jun 28, 2008
3,273
0
36
In my opinion Khadr forfeited his rights as a Canadian citizen when he was caught in the battlefields of Afganistan.
Right... take away the citizenship of someone born in Canada. <rolleyes> Nice slippery slope there.

The moral of the story is, when you bomb a compound of terrorist assholes, drop a few extra bombs and make sure you thoroughly finish the job.
The moral of the story is child soldiers are only child soldiers if they are not fighting against the US and NATO.
 

landscaper

New member
Feb 28, 2007
5,752
0
0
this will be headed back to the supreme court in the fall, the federal court's opinion of what is the correct action will be appealed and in a year or so the SCC will decide. By that time the tribunals should have finished their deliberations. If he is convicted and sentanced federally in the states he is there until the sentence runs out no appeal no early release. The treaty that allows the repatriation of convicted prisoners requires that the prosecutors office agree to the transfer and I don't see that happening .
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
83,823
120,306
113
this will be headed back to the supreme court in the fall, the federal court's opinion of what is the correct action will be appealed and in a year or so the SCC will decide. By that time the tribunals should have finished their deliberations. If he is convicted and sentanced federally in the states he is there until the sentence runs out no appeal no early release. The treaty that allows the repatriation of convicted prisoners requires that the prosecutors office agree to the transfer and I don't see that happening .
Yes, but we get to see how many tens of millions of dollars the SCC will fine Harpo and his buddies for fucking with the judges.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
29,377
10,725
113
Room 112
Tell you what CF. You get your liberal buddies together and adopt Mr Khadr. Feed him, clothe him, educate him and see if he's appreciative. My guess is you'd be kicking him out of the house before the first week is over. He was 15 when he was captured. Under Liberal theory he would be allowed to consent to sex and consent to abortion (if he was female). You can't suck and blow at the same time...........so which is it??
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,985
5,589
113
From the time the story of Khadr first appeared, I have predicted that the canadian government in the end will have to compensate him to the tune of millions of taxpayers dollars. Apart from being completely un-canadian and in violation of the charter, the government's action in this case shows stupidity of the highest order. Taxpayers will be paying for this idiocy.

Why the f**k does the stupid ministers not listen to the civil servants?
 

johnny

New member
Feb 12, 2002
232
0
0
The federal government not protecting Canadians charter rights? I cant believe that.
 

johnny

New member
Feb 12, 2002
232
0
0
this will be headed back to the supreme court in the fall, the federal court's opinion of what is the correct action will be appealed and in a year or so the SCC will decide. By that time the tribunals should have finished their deliberations. If he is convicted and sentanced federally in the states he is there until the sentence runs out no appeal no early release. The treaty that allows the repatriation of convicted prisoners requires that the prosecutors office agree to the transfer and I don't see that happening .
No that is not how it works. his is highly political and at any time if the Canadian governmenent requested Khadr retur to Canada it would be a diplomatic gesture to return him, just like all other western countries have done with their citizens held at at Gitmo.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,531
3,429
113
If Khadr were white, he's already be home. Every day he spends in Gitmo is more proof of Harpo's racism.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Tell you what CF. You get your liberal buddies together and adopt Mr Khadr. Feed him, clothe him, educate him and see if he's appreciative. My guess is you'd be kicking him out of the house before the first week is over. He was 15 when he was captured. Under Liberal theory he would be allowed to consent to sex and consent to abortion (if he was female). You can't suck and blow at the same time...........so which is it??
I think Khadr is a miserable waste of skin, but I think the rule of law in Canada is more important than he is, and not worth sacrificing over a scum like Khadr.

Apparently you do not hold the Canadian constitution in as high regard as I do--you're willing to throw it away as if it were toilet paper.

Fact is he is a natural born citizen. I don't like it, but he is one, and being a citizen is worth nothing if the government gets to arbitrarily ignore the guarantee of rights the constitution and the charter entail.
 

landscaper

New member
Feb 28, 2007
5,752
0
0
Is it your opinion that the Government of Canada can continue to flout SCC rulings?
they are not flouting the SCC ruling, the SCC specifically left it up to the govt to determine the course of action. The federal court has ruled they are not doing enough, that will be up to the SCC to determine.
 

landscaper

New member
Feb 28, 2007
5,752
0
0
No that is not how it works. his is highly political and at any time if the Canadian governmenent requested Khadr retur to Canada it would be a diplomatic gesture to return him, just like all other western countries have done with their citizens held at at Gitmo.
The other " western " prisoners were released to their home countries following guilty pleas. Kahdr has refused to plead out. Just as an aside UN forces have catured a number of the repatriated prisoners following their release in their home countries.
 

landscaper

New member
Feb 28, 2007
5,752
0
0
I have noticed a large number of people demanding the release of Mr Khadr , I have noticed a large number of people offering to provide him with lodgings when released.
 

dirk076

Member
Sep 24, 2004
972
0
18
Who fucking cares. As far as I'm concerned he forfeited his citizenship when he went to train as a terrorist. The only mistake here was that the U.S. took the little puke alive.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
they are not flouting the SCC ruling, the SCC specifically left it up to the govt to determine the course of action. The federal court has ruled they are not doing enough, that will be up to the SCC to determine.
See Oagre's post.
 
Toronto Escorts