Actually it's not quite like that. I have experience with these.It would be costly, 2-5 grand a month, and a bit embarrassing He 'I'm coming over' She 'Could you make it this afternoon'.
If you think your in this relationship you expect exclusivicity but you may be surprised if the lady is otherwise engaged.
Maybe I'm missing something, but why would anyone actually make a monthly agreement if said agreement only allows for X number of sessions at the going rate so as not to exceed the monthly fee? That's as bad as a gym membership...you pay whether you take advantage of the amenities or not. Actually it's worse; at least you have unlimited access for the month at a gym. It makes more sense just to book as needed if there's a cap on the number of sessions.If he's the type to prefer longer sessions (clock-free dates not including overnight, usually a 5-6 hour thing), then he gets a couple of those a month. 2 or 3 which adds up to what my monthly arrangement fee is = $6000/month.
If he's the type to prefer shorter arrangements, 1-3 hours, then obviously he is free to see me up to a certain point that doesn't exceed the monthly fee by a great deal. I wouldn't nitpick an hour or two.
Ya...I'm not sure I see the logic in this either.Maybe I'm missing something, but why would anyone actually make a monthly agreement if said agreement only allows for X number of sessions at the going rate so as not to exceed the monthly fee? That's as bad as a gym membership...you pay whether you take advantage of the amenities or not. Actually it's worse; at least you have unlimited access for the month at a gym. It makes more sense just to book as needed if there's a cap on the number of sessions.
I always thought a monthly arrangement was good for two things on the client's side: exclusivity (if that's an option) and value (buying individual sessions would cost more in the long-haul). On the escort's side, she makes guaranteed income and can focus on one likeable client.
I don't think it defeats the purpose.I had such an arrangement about 7 years ago. It lasted nearly 3 years. I paid a monthly fee, at the beginning of the month. It was an amount we were both comfortable with. Unlike what Chloe suggests, there was no counting of hours "up to the monthly fee". That somehow defeats the whole idea of paying a flat monthly fee. Honestly, if the SP had wanted to work that way, I would have ended it right away. There were weeks where we saw each other a number of times and others where we didn't see each other at all. I never felt like she wanted to cut a visit short because we were getting close to the hourly limit..since we never had discussed any "hourly" limits. She was comfortable with the amount we agreed to and not having to worry about being "cutoff" due to an hours per month limit made it more natural. She also traveled with me a number of times on business trips to the US and a few cities in Canada. There was never any extra "hours" costs on business trips although I would cover her travel costs . We actually got along great and always had a great time even though she was much younger than I was. I think the connection we had with the fact we were very clear at the start about the amount to be paid, made it easy. If an SP is going to start nitpicking on the hours, most gentleman would walk away I'm fairly sure. I know I would have. Although our arrangement ended years ago due to her life commitments, we are still in touch to this day. Every few months, we check how the other is doing.
Still makes no sense, but I can easily why it works for you. I guess my point is, what if the gentleman doesn't see you much in a month, to much less than the "hourly" fee would come to, would his monthly fee go down? I'm guessing no...because he's paying a monthly fee. With that kind of an arrangement, he might as well just pay per session and when he does, you lose your guaranteed income .I don't think it defeats the purpose.
Then again what works for me, doesn't work for everyone.
Point being, my way works for me.
I also think your kind of missing the point of my post.
I never said that I nitpicked the certain hours, I merely stated what I had experience with. Being that they usually ended up being an x amount of times per week and an x amount of dates a month.
I got technical but you shouldn't assume there is any negative connotation with that.
They are my own personal experiences and I use precedent to determine fees based on them.
If the gentleman sees me less, then he wouldn't be paying a monthly fee.Still makes no sense, but I can easily why it works for you. I guess my point is, what if the gentleman doesn't see you much in a month, to much less than the "hourly" fee would come to, would his monthly fee go down? I'm guessing no...because he's paying a monthly fee. With that kind of an arrangement, he might as well just pay per session and when he does, you lose your guaranteed income .
Anyway...I made my point. I'm moving on.
You might want to stipulate that on your website, cause right now it reads "Unlimited Visits- $6000.00 per month" This not what your saying in the above post.If he's the type to prefer longer sessions (clock-free dates not including overnight, usually a 5-6 hour thing), then he gets a couple of those a month. 2 or 3 which adds up to what my monthly arrangement fee is = $6000/month.
If he's the type to prefer shorter arrangements, 1-3 hours, then obviously he is free to see me up to a certain point that doesn't exceed the monthly fee by a great deal. I wouldn't nitpick an hour or two.
If a person is interested in the monthly arrangement, then they would contact me for info regarding that type of arrangement and what it entails. I list that on my contact page.You might want to stipulate that on your website, cause right now it reads "Unlimited Visits- $6000.00 per month" This not what your saying in the above post.
Confuse Terbites? Seriously? I think you must be the one that's confused. How else can anyone interpret "unlimited visits = $6000' other than ...it means unlimited. If you meant, visits up to the hourly value of $6,000...why not say that. To me, that statement of unlimited visits is simply false advertising but I guess if you said the truth, there would be no man in his right mind taking you up on it . I don't get why any man would. The way you explain it, it simply equates to seeing you at your hourly rate up to $6,000 worth and if he reaches it, I guess you cut him off and if doesn't, you give him money back? Too funny. Yea right. :eyebrows: So I just don't get the $6,000 a month.If a person is interested in the monthly arrangement, then they would contact me for info regarding that type of arrangement and what it entails. I list that on my contact page.
I don't like to give extensive detail pertaining to a meeting on my website, because not every arrangement is the same. I also prefer to keep things on my website as simple as possible. Any questions and the gentleman is free to contact me.
(Maybe I should switch the unlimited to just monthly arrangement though, not to confuse any Terbites.
It has never been an issue elsewhere but I can see how some may get confused.)
If what I relay to him works for him, great. If it doesn't, that is his decision to make, based on the info I give him.
Those specific time details are for private correspondence...at least for me? To tailor to their personal needs.
It is one thing to state your opinion but something completely different to call bullshit on experiences that you yourself haven't gone through.Confuse Terbites? Seriously? I think you must be the one that's confused. How else can anyone interpret "unlimited visits = $6000' other than ...it means unlimited. If you meant, visits up to the hourly value of $6,000...why not say that. To me, that statement of unlimited visits is simply false advertising but I guess if you said the truth, there would be no man in his right mind taking you up on it . I don't get why any man would. The way you explain it, it simply equates to seeing you at your hourly rate up to $6,000 worth and if he reaches it, I guess you cut him off and if doesn't, you give him money back? Too funny. Yea right. :eyebrows: So I just don't get the $6,000 a month.
Horngry's explanation of his arrangement certainly is more credible. . Chloe, I just think you're making it up as you go along to get attention, to get your ad up. That's how it looks to me anyway. :frusty:
Some guys love attention and or to post critical attacks. It's no wonder there are very few industry girls posting on TERB.Come on people. Give the girl a break. Everything that could possibly be said has been said.
Cons - I'm seeing 4 ladies on a regular basis and once in awhile, i go out and venture, like I did this week and found another gem. I do like variety and this type of arrangement would sort of defeat that purpose.Geez, I don't see anything wrong with Chloe's posts. If you're interested in the 6000/month, call her and arrange the details. Stop trying to fish for information! If I had that kind of cash, I might consider it. Would I go for unlimited visits? Hell no, I'm getting older not better! But there are intangible benefits to an arrangement like that. No waiting in line and getting sloppy seconds is one! LOL!
I'm sure if you enter one of these types of things, there'll be some form of contract discussed. Maybe not on paper, but both parties have to agree to the little details. So, there's pros and cons versus a pay per visit.
Pro - No guessing on what kind of girl is waiting for you behind the door. No "ooops, forgot to hit the bank today". No questions about quality of service. Steady girlfriend like experience, or even PSE if you're into that. It's a stable drama free relationship that either party can end at any time without any (or much) heartache. You're not constrained to the hour rate, and can take a beautiful woman out to hit the town.
Cons - you don't "own" the girl or her time. You're not exclusive for her.
Feel free to add...