Give it up. You can vote against the Government in the next election if you don't like what it is doing. The Canadian constitution does not give anybody the right to bear arms.
Trudeau bans assault rifle
- Thread starter Big Rig
- Start date
So you have zero arguments, by your lack of response I take it that in your eyes lies, deception and misinformation is fair game to get the end results you're after.
Are you slow? You can vote against the Government in the next election if you don't like what it is doing. The Canadian constitution does not give anybody the right to bear arms.
Yes I can vote.
But are you ok with the misinformation, lies and deception of this government and how they went about it ?
If you really need to rant, go ahead.
Just don't expect any sympathy.
Accept that you're in the minority and like owning pit bulls and pipe bombs, the government and the people of Canada aren't really into it.
Originally Posted by shack
I have been in the middle of dozens of these discussions here already and heard all the arguments on both sides.
TERB is not the be all and end all for forming opinions. I am for sensible gun control. Others will accept no compromise.
I know there are lots of insults flying around but yours definitely go beyond what is considered acceptable. You have called me a stupid and ignorant cunt twice among other crass names. TBH, I hope you keep it up.
I have been in the middle of dozens of these discussions here already and heard all the arguments on both sides.
TERB is not the be all and end all for forming opinions. I am for sensible gun control. Others will accept no compromise.
That is what you responded to.
I know there are lots of insults flying around but yours definitely go beyond what is considered acceptable. You have called me a stupid and ignorant cunt twice among other crass names. TBH, I hope you keep it up.
I wonder if this charter challenge will fly. Probably not, but you never know:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/12-gauge-shotguns-firearms-charter-challenge-1.5559402
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/12-gauge-shotguns-firearms-charter-challenge-1.5559402
It will shed light on the incompetence of Blair and the Trudeau government at the least.
This guy literally banned guns based on their color lmao
I'm not the minority and here is the proof.
The questionnaire asked respondents if they believe more should be done to limit access to assault weapons. 133,369 respondents answered this question.
Overall, when asked if their believe more should be done to limit access to assault weapons, 21% said “Yes”, 77% said “No”, and 2% indicated they had no opinion.
And for handguns:
The questionnaire asked respondents if they believe more should be done to limit access to handguns. 133,322 respondents answered this question.
Overall, when asked if they believe more should be done to limit access to handguns, 18% said “Yes”, 81% said “No”, and 1% indicated they had no opinion.
For the above post here is the source
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/...T_FrqfxpHQx0nlZBApatyS19E1fBIj-nOYbgPjCE#a322
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/...T_FrqfxpHQx0nlZBApatyS19E1fBIj-nOYbgPjCE#a322
So 21% say more should be done to limit access to "assault wespons"
And 18% think more should be done to limit access to handguns.
Here is a definition of majority for you:
plural**majorities
Definition of**majority
1a:**a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
And 18% think more should be done to limit access to handguns.
Here is a definition of majority for you:
plural**majorities
Definition of**majority
1a:**a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
That wasn't a poll, that was an online questionaire.I'm not the minority and here is the proof.
The questionnaire asked respondents if they believe more should be done to limit access to assault weapons. 133,369 respondents answered this question.
Overall, when asked if their believe more should be done to limit access to assault weapons, 21% said “Yes”, 77% said “No”, and 2% indicated they had no opinion.
And for handguns:
The questionnaire asked respondents if they believe more should be done to limit access to handguns. 133,322 respondents answered this question.
Overall, when asked if they believe more should be done to limit access to handguns, 18% said “Yes”, 81% said “No”, and 1% indicated they had no opinion.
Looks like it was spammed, considering its the diametric opposite of all recent real polls.
Yes and numerous gun owners and those interested in that so called sport probably responded!!
nottyboi, please think it out before you pop off incoherently. Americans have a very difficult time buying firearms from out of their country. One has to complete and submit a Form 6, Application for Importation of Firearms, Ammunition and Defense Articles to the ATF for their approval and processing. That can take about six weeks. After that, it is a circuitous and winding labyrinth to bring your guns into the US. If you have a Federal Firearms Licence, you will need to be registered as an importer under the Arms Export Control Act.
I was formerly in the firearms business and sold long guns to a dealer in the US, so I know of such things. Unfortunately, he smuggled them into the US instead of filing the proper paperwork and going through channels. We were visited by the OPP and the RCMP to discuss our part in the transactions. We were warned about selling to persons without a valid Canadian firearms licence, which the American dealer did not have. The American dealer was raided by the ATF Swat boys, lost his Federal Firearms Licence, all of his firearms, his livelihood and did time in the Pen for his indiscretion.
Once again you guys dont actually read anything, you simply spout off your opinions without any backup
In addition to the online questionnaire and in-person roundtables, Public Safety called for written submissions from a wide range of stakeholders. Submissions came in a variety of formats, including position/research papers, briefing notes/memos and emails. Overall, 36 submissions were received from invited stakeholders representing a diversity of groups/organizations, sectors and perspectives which are identified in the chart below:
Stakeholders.Once again you guys dont actually read anything, you simply spout off your opinions without any backup
In addition to the online questionnaire and in-person roundtables, Public Safety called for written submissions from a wide range of stakeholders. Submissions came in a variety of formats, including position/research papers, briefing notes/memos and emails. Overall, 36 submissions were received from invited stakeholders representing a diversity of groups/organizations, sectors and perspectives which are identified in the chart below:
It wasn't a poll, it was an online 'stakeholder' survey that was clearly flooded by NRA type bots.
If it was a legit poll it wouldn't be the total opposite of what every real poll has found.
