What charges were laid?Protecting him again........ROTFLMAO!!
What charges were laid?Protecting him again........ROTFLMAO!!
No charges as it was not "Beyond Reasonable Doubt". However we know it is a cover up:What charges were laid?
So, I didn't protect anyone. Just spoke the truth.No charges as it was not "Beyond Reasonable Doubt". However we know it is a cover up:
Hey, The Daily Wire!....
Okay, this was INEVITABLY going to be Butler's post and Twitter has been loading up to cut this horseshit down all day. "Several examples" my ass!!!! Let's start with one of those bullshit examples.....So, I didn't protect anyone. Just spoke the truth.
I'd say Hunter is the one who got things covered up. I've been seeing several examples of Black people with the exact same charges for gun applications and tax evasion in jail.
I guess being the white President's son helps......
Apart from the past convictions it may highlight the unequal justice afforded blacks. Maybe the despicables should be championing justice reform.Okay, this was INEVITABLY going to be Butler's post and Twitter has been loading up to cut this horseshit down all day. "Several examples" my ass!!!! Let's start with one of those bullshit examples.....
How about being the White President who got impeached twice and rightfully so. He incited the January 6th Insurrection, and his obstruction in the handling of the Mar-a-Lago Documents should have seen him in jail on espionage charges. Look at the others who got imprisoned for such charges. Yet he got off lightly in the rape charges as well!!So, I didn't protect anyone. Just spoke the truth.
I'd say Hunter is the one who got things covered up. I've been seeing several examples of Black people with the exact same charges for gun applications and tax evasion in jail.
I guess being the white President's son helps......
In other words: I can't refute it. Just say that or stay quiet.Hey, The Daily Wire!....
The only lying piece of shit website where you get to see Ben Shapiro discussing movie picks with Jordan Peterson!![]()
You keep dreaming and hoping, jc, never give up.
In other words.How about being the White President who got impeached twice and rightfully so. He incited the January 6th Insurrection, and his obstruction in the handling of the Mar-a-Lago Documents should have seen him in jail on espionage charges. Look at the others who got imprisoned for such charges. Yet he got off lightly in the rape charges as well!!
Also, I just started a thread about George Santos who was bailed out by his father and aunt. He should have been in jail, as what he did over the years was really several felonies!!
https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/22/politics/george-santos-bond-cosigners-family-members/index.html
The First Step Act?Apart from the past convictions it may highlight the unequal justice afforded blacks. Maybe the despicables should be championing justice reform.
You ignore my direct rebuttal of your point and attack someone you think is an easier target. SMH.In other words.
Butler is correct so I'm going to try to change the topic to Trump. As usual.
Cripes you are boring
Waiting for evidence that's actually "evidence" and not some crap on The Daily Wire.In other words: I can't refute it. Just say that or stay quiet.
Of course you say that because years ago you decided that anyone in the Democratic party must be corrupt. Jared taking cash from countries involved in his WH portfolio doesn't seem to touch your radar though of course.As a conduit for cash for favorable diplomacy I'd say he was a part of it.
There was undoubtablky Russian involvement in the elections through their social media bots and it is undoubtable that Trump benefitted. The only 'debunked' thing was whether Trump was directly involved with Russia.Debunked.
Yes, reminds you of a certain Canadian Prime Minister and his Chinese paymasters he's covering for, eh? ROTFLMFAO x 1000!!!There was undoubtablky Russian involvement in the elections through their social media bots and it is undoubtable that Trump benefitted. The only 'debunked' thing was whether Trump was directly involved with Russia.
I agree. The key point is there was no proof of "collusion". Or at least no more than what has been discovered between Trudeau and Chinese links.There was undoubtablky Russian involvement in the elections through their social media bots and it is undoubtable that Trump benefitted. The only 'debunked' thing was whether Trump was directly involved with Russia.