Swanson is not a closer. Never has been, never will be. Though, from my understanding there was some bad luck and poor fielding backing Swanson up.So much for the idea of making Swanson the closer.
Somebody, while complaining about Romano, suggested it a few weeks ago.Swanson is not a closer. Never has been, never will be.
Found it.Somebody, while complaining about Romano, suggested it a few weeks ago.
Swanson has a better strikeout rate, lower batting average against and better ERA than Romano so why is Romano the closer?
The punters always complain about Romano after a blown save. And as you know there's more to a closer than stats, a closer needs to have the mindset to operate in a high pressure/leverage position and Romano excels in that role. He pitches better when there's a save on the line vs. when there's not one. Thrives on the pressure.Somebody, while complaining about Romano, suggested it a few weeks ago.
Just out of curiosity, do you plan on having that engraved on his headstone?Found it.
You don't get it.The punters always complain about Romano after a blown save.
I get it and defended Romano in the past. I agree with everything you are saying. But it's easy to say trade a guy, send him to the minors. Sure, if there's a good reason for that action, but they can't provide any quantifiable reasons, just their opinion.You don't get it.
He's only blown 3 saves out of 31 so there's not many opportunities there for them.
They complain, even after saves, if he allows any baserunners. They complain about the white knuckles they get. If it's not 3 up, 3 down he gets ripped.
Last night showed how valuable and underappreciated he is. He'd pitched in 4 of the last 5 games so he was unavailable.
I forgot to put a laughing face at the end of my comment. I was just having fun.Huh?
0 for 4 today in the leadoff position, with a walk.How do you solve a problem like Springer?
I think On Base Percentage belongs at the top of the order, with speed at the top and bottom, so I agree with your choices.0 for 4 today in the leadoff position, with a walk.
Back to my post from the other week (look it up), Whit Merrifield (2 for 4, with a homer) should be moved to leadoff and Springer should be moved to split Belt and Vladdy based on base running speed.
And that's exactly what my point is. They don't like him, but have no justifiable backup to counter his excellent stats, other than they get nervous because he didn't pitch a clean 9th.I get it and defended Romano in the past. I agree with everything you are saying. But it's easy to say trade a guy, send him to the minors. Sure, if there's a good reason for that action, but they can't provide any quantifiable reasons, just their opinion.
I wouldn’t like it, but I would like it better than VarshoJust wait to see if you'd feel the same way if Jays re acquired him and he started flubbing plays in the OF again!
If not for that, they would have swept the mighty LA Dodgers in LA. That would've been impressive.Swanson giving up a 4 run lead in the ninth.
I am in LA right now, and I went to yesterday afternoons game. It wasn’t even a full house, big slow lineups everywhere, and by the time we got our hotdogs and drinks and got to our seat, it was the fourth and it was ridiculous. Everyone’s got a smile on their face like it’s a normal thing lol wtf.If not for that, they would have swept the mighty LA Dodgers in LA. That would've been impressive.