Based on that criteria why not vote for NDP or the Green Party?
Poll: Who gets your vote
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
First off, You basically said you'd vote for the Devil over God.
Secondly, I think this thread does illustrate what's wrong with politics, but not for the reason you pointed out. I've brought tons of fact based arguments to the Liberal supporters on this site, but they continue to deny and troll. What can you say to someone who boldly tells you 1mil immigrants in 9 months is ok? They only do it because They don't want to admit they're wrong.
That's what it really breaks down to. Liberals don't like what's going on, but just don't want to admit they are wrong. It's childish, ignorant and stubborn.
which turns out to be a minority on this site
3 to 1 to be more specific
yet they are loud, consistent and obnoxious
to make themselves look like they are a majority
My vote is no vote. Charles in Charge, absolute monarchy, strange women in ponds giving out swords for the win.
If I am burdened with the vote, Cthulhu is the way to go, why settle for the lesser evil. If I must vote human, Zombie Taft, fat guys represent yo.
If I am burdened with the vote, Cthulhu is the way to go, why settle for the lesser evil. If I must vote human, Zombie Taft, fat guys represent yo.
Mark Carney might be a bit of all right in the Paul Martin mold.
If you take the bible seriously, the devil is the one who introduced us to knowledge and the path from ignorence.
It isn't the devil who ordered mass exterminations
It isn't the devil who will torture you in the most horrific manner [not as bad as a Justin Beiber concert but still pretty bad] if you don't love him like some psycho ex bf/gf
It isn't the devil who put one of his followers through utter misery just to win a bet
It isn't the devil who ordered his followers to kill people for all sorts of minor reasons from working on Sunday or doing gay buttsex.
It isn't the devil that condoned slavery.
Thankfully I don't take the bible seriously, I mean God has done some good work, songs like Iron Man, Crazy Train, Paranoid, very enjoyable, where as the devil, fuck Justin Beiber is all I have to say.
Your original comment only compared JT to PP and no one else. That's what I was responding to.
You're reaching....I've been on the Israel thread from the start....never seen one guy said about muslims...you keep playing the race card even when there's no need for one....you keep crying for shitwolf...
What's behind Canada's housing crisis? Decades of policy failures, says former deputy PM
Canada’s housing crunch is the result of decades of poor policy stemming from the federal government leaving the issue to the provinces in the 1980s, according to one former deputy prime minister.
Former deputy prime minister Sheila Copps said in an interview with BNN Bloomberg(opens in a new tab) that when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) was involved in building housing, there was a significant amount of national investment in housing as well as housing policy and strategy.
“The decision that was made back in 1987 to get out of housing at the federal level has resulted in 30 years of underbuilt housing, and also 30 years of not really analyzing good public policy on housing,” Copps said. “I think that's a big issue.”
POLICY SHIFTS
According to Copps, who served as a Liberal deputy prime minister in the 1990s, housing policy in the 1970s saw the national government more directly involved in building housing, including the development of seniors and Indigenous housing.
This changed in the 1980s when provincial governments took over housing policy, Copps said.
While some provincial governments, like Quebec, decided to allocate funding to social housing, Copps said many others have not.
“When the provincial governments took over the money (intended for housing), a lot of them didn't actually spend it on housing,” she said.
From that period on, she said the federal government was not involved in housing until 2017 when the Liberal government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau decided to “insert itself back into the housing game.” Copps said this move marked the beginning of a collaboration that will take time to address the issues of shortage and affordability currently plaguing Canadian cities.
“Now five years later, we're looking at a problem that has been percolating since we signed off on housing back in 1987,” Copps said.
“Sometimes a national government needs to be at the table to fix problems and leaving it up to 10 provinces and three territories is not always the right way to go.”
ENCOURAGING MIGRATION
In addition to building homes to increase supply, Copps said the federal housing strategy should also entail ways to incentivize migration out of Canada’s most densely populated areas.
“The other thing we need to look at is what the housing prices are in rural and remote communities versus urban areas and how we can encourage people to move around. We learned during the pandemic that everybody doesn't have to live in downtown Toronto,” she said.
“There's lots of opportunities to make people think about migrating elsewhere and getting maybe extra points for a registered homeownership investment plan. These things should be built into the thinking and to have that you really need to have a national government that is not just looking at building housing.”
www.ctvnews.ca
Canada’s housing crunch is the result of decades of poor policy stemming from the federal government leaving the issue to the provinces in the 1980s, according to one former deputy prime minister.
Former deputy prime minister Sheila Copps said in an interview with BNN Bloomberg(opens in a new tab) that when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) was involved in building housing, there was a significant amount of national investment in housing as well as housing policy and strategy.
“The decision that was made back in 1987 to get out of housing at the federal level has resulted in 30 years of underbuilt housing, and also 30 years of not really analyzing good public policy on housing,” Copps said. “I think that's a big issue.”
POLICY SHIFTS
According to Copps, who served as a Liberal deputy prime minister in the 1990s, housing policy in the 1970s saw the national government more directly involved in building housing, including the development of seniors and Indigenous housing.
This changed in the 1980s when provincial governments took over housing policy, Copps said.
While some provincial governments, like Quebec, decided to allocate funding to social housing, Copps said many others have not.
“When the provincial governments took over the money (intended for housing), a lot of them didn't actually spend it on housing,” she said.
From that period on, she said the federal government was not involved in housing until 2017 when the Liberal government led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau decided to “insert itself back into the housing game.” Copps said this move marked the beginning of a collaboration that will take time to address the issues of shortage and affordability currently plaguing Canadian cities.
“Now five years later, we're looking at a problem that has been percolating since we signed off on housing back in 1987,” Copps said.
“Sometimes a national government needs to be at the table to fix problems and leaving it up to 10 provinces and three territories is not always the right way to go.”
ENCOURAGING MIGRATION
In addition to building homes to increase supply, Copps said the federal housing strategy should also entail ways to incentivize migration out of Canada’s most densely populated areas.
“The other thing we need to look at is what the housing prices are in rural and remote communities versus urban areas and how we can encourage people to move around. We learned during the pandemic that everybody doesn't have to live in downtown Toronto,” she said.
“There's lots of opportunities to make people think about migrating elsewhere and getting maybe extra points for a registered homeownership investment plan. These things should be built into the thinking and to have that you really need to have a national government that is not just looking at building housing.”
What's behind Canada's housing crisis? Decades of policy failures, says former deputy PM
Canada's housing crunch is the result of decades of poor policy stemming from the federal government leaving the issue to the provinces in the 1980s, according to one former deputy prime minister.
They make so much noise and diversion as possible to avoid admitting they were wrong.which turns out to be a minority on this site
3 to 1 to be more specific
yet they are loud, consistent and obnoxious
to make themselves look like they are a majority
You have to look at the bigger picture. We haven't seen Progressives policies get this far in a long time and it's blown up in their face.
They learned a lesson: It's either you deal with reality or reality will deal with you.
All it does is confirm the claim that the terb board swings right and doesn't represent the views of Canada.
New budget today, the libs will tax the rich.
PeePee declares that's an attack on the middle class and the NDP say they should end all oil&gas subsidies and tax corporate profits too.
Splitting the vote between Libs & NDP only means the PCs will win.
And considering Jagmeet has not accepted the budget yet, that can be sooner rather than later.
No, it means that the cons never get as many votes, even now when PeePee hasn't had to announce any policies.
He's still polling less than the left wing.
