Again you have not answered my question.
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!
Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
Mulroney accepted the bribe based on what he did in office. What is the big deal if one gets the equivalent of a post dated cheque?
As usual you hate the facts!!
Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.
Maybe you forgot that Modi is the culprit in this whole affair.
But you of course idolize him!!
The culprits are these foreign separatists using and abusing their citizenship privileges.
Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.
You again failed to answer my question in the first place. Face it, as you do not have a response!!
No the bribe was not from his time in office.
It was between 93 and 94 when he had stepped down as PM.
Those are the facts.
You failed at your example.
Your question is useless as it is a red herring especially given your failure.
No, the ones that ordered the killings, extortion and threats to Canadians.
Now it is the ones perpetrating the cyber threats:
India is ‘emerging threat’ to Canada’s cyber security: report | Watch News Videos Online
Watch India is ‘emerging threat’ to Canada’s cyber security: report Video Online, on GlobalNews.ca
globalnews.ca
Of course you will deny it!!
Those are the Sikh separatists.
They are engaged in crime, gun running, terrorism and other criminal activities.
Revoke and deport!
Again you cannot comprehend that the bribes were due to the airbus contracts that were signed during his time in office:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Enough said!!
Then go and give your evidence to the RCMP. Really all useless allegations with the present day Sikhs who are peacefully protesting for an Independent Khalistan.
They have the Divine Rights to do so in a Democratic Nation like Canada!!
From your Article:Again you cannot comprehend that the bribes were due to the airbus contracts that were signed during his time in office:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
Enough said!!
Although there is no evidence that Mulroney accepted kickbacks while prime minister, he acknowledged in 2003 that shortly after stepping down in 1993 that he accepted $225,000 over 18 months from Schreiber, in three cash payments of $75,000 each.
As I said, you failed.
India has given it to the RCMP.
In 1985 they did too. Ignored. 300 dead.
So now take them seriously.
They know their people.
Revoke and deport!
I guess according to you they have the divine rights to bomb a plane and kill 300 people.
He accepted the bribes....... period. Tell us why would they pay him after he left office, if it did not point to the his time in office.
By the way read the whole context of this enquiry:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So one payment received while he was still in office. Well you failed!!
Last edited:
So those who were responsible were arrested and served their time. Yet you lump all the Sikhs in that category.
Prove that all those protesting peacefully are "Terrorists" in your vocabulary!!
That was for his consulting business where it would be legitimate to accept payments into your bank accounts.He accepted the bribes....... period. Tell us why would they pay him after he left office, if it did not point to the his toime in office.
By the way read the whole context of this enquiry:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
So one payment received while he was still in office. Well you failed!!
Unrelated to cash for access payments Trudeau is accused of.
So you failed in your example.
Even if I were to accept your example, it does not help you.
It means you'd be saying that there are no corrupt politicians, just because they dont receive money directly into their chequing accounts.
If it was not declared in his tax returns or declared when he was in office, how can it be considered to be for consulting purposes?
Again you have not proven that any money for The Trudeau Foundation was for Justin's personal account or personal means!!
You failed, as you cannot answer that question. Yet I have proven to you that Mulroney received the CASH payments for his own means!!
